[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 512 KB, 773x660, 1577723723024.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19772795 No.19772795[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

So I've finally read some works of Réné Guénon and concluded that I need to join an authentic religion, as per his literature detailing the true importance of this.

What are some traditions that approve of anal sex between a man and his wife?
>Islam
>Anal with your wife is strictly haram and can even allow her to divorce you if you insist on it.
Seems to be out of the question. Although I'm not sure both Sunni and Shia scholars fully agree, or if there is an obscure but still legitimate sect which approves of it.
>Judaism
>There is some weird trick where it is acceptable to penetrate the anus, but strictly a sin to cum inside, so I would have to reinsert into her vagina to coom.
This sounds unclean, but so far seems like the only option.

Is there a religion that allows me to anal my wife without going through Jewish legalistic hoops?

>> No.19772814

Do you want an authentic religion or a LARP?
Become Unitarian Universalist or LaVeyan Satanist if you want to do things that lead to nowhere but feel good.
I'm sure liberal Protestant Christianity also has room for this.
I'm not sure how much these can be called "authentic religions" though, although Protestant Christianity probably is legitimate enough (LaVeyan Satanism is a shitpost and UU is a social club).

>> No.19772818

>>19772795
Start with the Greeks

>> No.19772828
File: 54 KB, 490x612, Sayed_Sadiq_Shirazi.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19772828

>>19772795
>Is there a religion that allows me to anal my wife without going through Jewish legalistic hoops?
God hates anal i'm afraid. Persian Shia's put in the heavily discouraged category rather than the absolute haram category though.

>> No.19772859

Are there any authentic religions that condone me being anally penetrated? Please no pr*testantisms, I said authentic.

>> No.19772874

>>19772795
Anal sex is okay in Tantric Hinduism from what I understand, it may be in Tantric Buddhism too but I dont know, I think there is some outlawing of homosexual acts in Tibetan Buddhism. You could join a Shaivist or Shaktist sect

>> No.19772898

>>19772859
not OP

>> No.19773725

Holy fuck imagine being such a big coomer that you want to put your dick inside an anus. Please OP stop being a degenerate, its disgusting.

>> No.19773755

>>19772795
Convert to Catholicism.

>> No.19773952

>>19772795
A liberal Protestant reading of Hebrews 13:4 will get you there. Catholics and Orthodox would say that refers strictly to sexual activity for procreative purposes (CCC 2351, https://www.oca.org/holy-synod/encyclicals/on-marriage)) although Catholics uniformly and expressly condemn nonprocreative sexual acts while the Orthodox Church seemingly takes a more nuanced view. Protestants obviously do not have a unified tradition and rules, but I can find several Evangelical sources arguing both in favor of it and against it (https://justdisciple.com/christian-sex/, https://intimacyinmarriage.com/2020/11/18/is-anal-sex-permissible-in-a-christian-marriage/, https://www.focusonthefamily.com/family-qa/oral-and-anal-sex-biblical-guidelines-for-intimacy-in-marriage/.).) Most Evangelical couples seem to find it permissible, based on surveys. https://www.christianpost.com/news/christian-couples-engaging-in-kinky-sex-including-anal-play-say-its-ok-if-its-in-heterosexual-marriage-researcher-finds.html.. This also isn't touching on the churches that have allowed male homosexual unions, which almost by default involve anal penetration.
Most branches of Protestantism emphasize developing a personal morality based in an active spiritual life and reading of the Bible, so the most common answer there is going to be "pray on it and seek God." Since you wanted to know if any religions allow it, liberal Protestantism would be my answer.

>> No.19774025

>>19773952
I forgot to also add that Song of Solomon (or Song of Songs) seems to contain multiple veiled allusions to oral sex between a husband and wife in chapter 4, which would support the Protestant case for nonprocreative sex being acceptable.

>> No.19775679

>>19772795
I have a question: Why tho?
Should you really be choosing what religion you want to follow on the basis of which one is lenient to a sexual desire of yours? Instead of one which you genuinely believe will provide the greatest health for the soul?