/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.19763192]

Marx didn't die. He shaved his head and beard and went under the name Michel Foucault.

[Anonymous No.19763321]

Retard

[Anonymous No.19763447]

>>19763192
Yes, the man who fought against the inclusion of gender and race-based theory into the early communist movement became the man who most worked toward that inclusion.
retard.

[Anonymous No.19763471]

>>19763192
I’m convinced that most Foucault haters have never read him. I believe he would be highly critical of the so called left wing today. They are the ones in power now and in cahoots with the media

[Anonymous No.19763705]

>>19763192

Marx doesn't matter.

[Anonymous No.19763718]

>nietzsche 2.0 is a Marxist
wew lad

[Anonymous No.19763746]

>>19763447
elaborate on that

[Anonymous No.19763755]

>>19763192
Mikey the Fucker

[Anonymous No.19764016]

>>19763718
>>nietzsche
that'd be Deleuze

[Anonymous No.19764022]

>>19763447
Moron

[Anonymous No.19764045]

>>19763192
God you're stupid

[Anonymous No.19764062]

Foucault wrecked Marx in The Order of Things:

At the deepest level of Western knowledge, Marxism introduced no real discontinuity; it found its place without difficulty, as a full, quiet, comfortable and, goodness knows, satisfying form for a time (its own), within an epistemological arrangement that welcomed it gladly (since it was this arrangement that was in fact making room for it) and that it, in return, had no intention of disturbing and, above all, no power to modify, even one jot, since it rested entirely upon it. Marxism exists in nineteenth- century thought like a fish in water: that is, it is unable to breathe anywhere else. Though it is in opposition to the ‘bourgeois’ theories of economics, and though this opposition leads it to use the project of a radical reversal of History as a weapon against them, that conflict and that project nevertheless have as their condition of possibility, not the reworking of all History, but an event that any archaeology can situate with precision, and that prescribed simultaneously, and according to the same mode, both nineteenth-century bourgeois economics and nineteenth-century revolutionary economics. Their controversies may have stirred up a few waves and caused a few surface ripples; but they are no more than storms in a children’s paddling pool.

[Anonymous No.19764070]

>>19763192
why do leftist worship convicted pedos

[Anonymous No.19764076]

>>19764070
I miss the days when 4chan was firmly pro-pedo.

[Anonymous No.19764225]

>>19764062
Sounds just like Marx

[Anonymous No.19764233]

>>19763192
And also became a bath house pedo?

[Anonymous No.19764265]

>>19764076
Nah, its just a few loud 2016 tourists poltards and some redditfags. /Lit/ is a certified cunny board.

[Anonymous No.19764266]

>>19763746

[Anonymous No.19764280]

Something about him is just so repulsive to me. I refuse to read his writings.

[Anonymous No.19764306]

>>19764280
Oh no, what a loss for the foucauldian thought a random low iq nigger will not read him..