[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 44 KB, 568x384, 570_T-v-D.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19743121 No.19743121 [Reply] [Original]

What did they think of each other?

>> No.19743125

>>19743121
Who gives a fuck?

>> No.19743140

>>19743125
Dostocuck already shook.

>> No.19743144

>>19743121
THREAD HIJACKING IN ORDER. PUT YOUR FEED WHERE I CAN SNEED THEM.
>Tolstoy = Sneed
>Dostoyevsky = Feed
>Tolstoyevsky = Sneed Feed
>Tolstoy's'evsky = Sneed's Feed
>Tolstoy's'evsky and (Tolstoy minus Need) = Sneed's Feed and Seed

>> No.19743158

>>19743140
I prefer Tolstoy, actually, but who cares what one person thinks about another?

>> No.19743165

>>19743121
They both respected one another greatly

>> No.19743179

Judging by relative eyebrow quantity, I believe Tolstoy would take the dominant stance in a potential gay love scenario.

>> No.19743185

Greetings /lit/. My name is Leo Tolstoy (fr fr no cap). Once, I met Dostoyesky (no cap, fr fr). AMA.

>> No.19743194

>>19743121
Dostoevsky respected Tolstoy a lot
Their wives were friends

>> No.19743202
File: 105 KB, 233x389, sneedily.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19743202

>>19743158
>>19743165
>>19743179
>>19743194
>>19743185
UH, excuse me CHUDDY; but this is a heckin' hiJAKing. Put your sneed where I can feed them!!

>> No.19743210

>>19743202
why do you do this

>> No.19743217

Kys

>> No.19743225

>>19743210
qa got jannied

>> No.19743229

>>19743225
can't you guys just do the same thing on /b/?

>> No.19743239

>>19743229
nah

>> No.19743267

>>19743121
Both great. Simple as

>> No.19743281
File: 50 KB, 615x621, simpleas.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19743281

Lov me Tolstoy
Lov me Dostoyevsky
Simple as

>> No.19743293

Tolstoy was quite fond of dostoevsky, upon learning of his death he said
>I’ve never seen this man and never had any relations with him, and all of a sudden, when he died, I understood that this was the closest, the dearest man for me, the man whose presence I needed the most… I considered him a friend, and had no doubt that we’ll see each other someday…

>> No.19743301

>>19743293
>When he died, I understood that he was such a very kindred, dear and necessary person to me. I was a man of letters, and men of letters are all vain, jealous, I at least was that kind of man of letters. But never did it enter my head to compare myself to him, never. All that he did (what he did that was good and real) was such that the more he did, the better it was for me. Art arouses envy in me, intellect does, too, but matters of the heart [arouse] only joy. I thus considered him my friend and never imagined that we wouldn't meet. And suddenly, over dinner [...] I read that he is dead. Some kind of support was taken away from under me. I fell apart, and at that point it became clear how dear he was to me and I wept and I weep still."

>> No.19743500
File: 147 KB, 957x1300, farmer-pointing-double-barreled-shotgun-forward-west-country-123256043.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19743500

>>19743225
go back to basedjak party, vermin.

>> No.19743652

>19743225
Doesn't mean you need to mess up here
You'll get more (You)s on /v/ anyways

>> No.19743909

>>19743121
Dosto recommended Tolstoy works in some of his letters. Tolstoy name dropped Dosto in Ressurection. They were rivals so to speak but they respected each other.

>> No.19743931

Tolstoy supposedly had a copy of The Brothers Karamazov at his side when he died.

>> No.19743936

>>19743909
>rivals
lolwut

this isnt WWE you fucking USA ape nigger

>> No.19743994

>>19743936
Read this you:
>>19743301
Rivalry and competition between artists has always existed.

>> No.19744002

>>19743931
The Brothers Karamazov killed him

>> No.19744841

>>19743121
Tolstoy was very fond of him
>Just recently I was feeling unwell and read House of the Dead. I had forgotten a good bit, read it over again, and I do not know a better book in all our new literature, including Pushkin. If you see Dostoevsky, tell him that I love him.

>> No.19744852

>>19743267
>Simple as
Is this something Brits say or something? I've never heard anyone say simple as.

>> No.19744917

>>19743936
Brother if you don’t recognize it’s all a work you’ll work yourself into a shoot mark

>> No.19745087
File: 715 KB, 1920x1078, 1628613872776.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19745087

Who pulled more clunge?

>> No.19745391

>>19743121
Bit of a 4chan v reddit thing going on with these 2 imo

>> No.19745648

>>19743158
Dostoevsky by a Kentucky mile. Not even close.
How do I know this? Well it's simple. It comes down to a question of dialogue vs description.
For example, you could have write
>he greeted her warmly
Or you could write the dialogue
>"it's nice to see you again"

Writing believable, compelling dialogue is hard. It requires years of practice and perhaps a degree of natural talent.
Descriptive writing, on the other hand, is relatively easy. We describe things all the time in our day-to-day lives.
War and Peace contains almost no dialogue. This shows a lack of confidence. Tolstoy knew he was incapable of writing good dialogue for his characters.
Dostoevsky's books are chock full of dialogue and demonstrate a mastery of art.

>> No.19745653

>>19743144
but also feet

>> No.19745707

>>19743121
What's so good about Tolstoy? Anna Karenina was okay but I never really think about it after finishing it. I've thought a lot about every Dostoy story though

>> No.19745720

>>19745648
>>"it's nice to see you again

that's not necessarily 'warm' dialogue. context. context comes through description, not dialogue. maybe you should just watch a movie instead.

>> No.19745767

>>19745720
>maybe you should just watch a movie instead
No movies are for showing, not telling. If a picture is worth a thousand words, then imagine how much a movie must be worth.
Now count how many of those words are dialogue and you understand that most of the information from a movie is conveyed through visual description.
In literature, description should provide context as you say. It should be the backdrop for the main event, dialogue.

>> No.19745871

>>19743293
Damn... And what did Dostoevsky say when Tolstoy died?

>> No.19745890

>>19745648
>War and Peace contains almost no dialogue.
Jesus christ lmao

>> No.19745900

>>19745707
Don't know quite what to say. I definitely think about War and Peace. Haven't read AK

>> No.19747056

“If you see Dostoevsky, tell him that I love him.”

— Leo Tolstoy in a letter to Strakhov, September 26, 1880

>> No.19747060

>>19743140
kek

>> No.19747108

>>19743301
He criticized Brothers K when it first came out, then re-read it and enjoyed it decades later. He was going to write to D and then he died.

>> No.19747121

>>19743293
>and had no doubt that we’ll see each other someday…
Nice.

>> No.19747131

>>19744852
It's a shortening of the phrase "simple as pie"

>> No.19747508

>>19745871
KEK

>> No.19748598

>you will get to see authors such as Tolstoy, Cervantes, Dostoevsky, Dante, Augustine, and Kierkegaard in Heaven
>you will all get to enjoy true Sabbath rest in God's presence after finishing the race and overcoming the trials of this life
>all by the grace of God
:)

>> No.19748634

>>19743909
Dosto also name dropped Tolstoy in The Brothers Karamazov

>> No.19748838

>>19745871
lol

>> No.19749219

>>19744002
Lol