[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 37 KB, 644x476, 501E4ACB-C151-4039-B4BE-978E9E900834.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19731330 No.19731330 [Reply] [Original]

Any books that explain this? In the elementary particles there is a scene where Bruno explains that people who can satisfy their sexual desires easily need more extreme stimuli to get excited, I'm looking for something like that

>> No.19731342

>>19731330
Nobody satisfies their sequel desire easily. That's your first problem. The easier the availability of sex the less satisfying it is and the more extreme the need becomes. Like drinking sea water. The life of a depraved sex God is just dehydration. The best life is for a constant steady and sustainable but still hard to cultivate flow of sex. Like water from a desert well. Hard to get to, and difficult to keep.

>> No.19731351

>>19731342
*sexual not sequel

Just to finish the metaphor. The man in the desert savors every drop of hard won water and is satiated. The man drowning in pussy is wet but unhappy.100% of the time.

>> No.19731372

>>19731342
Right, then there's the internet. An overabundance of sexual stimuli induces a sort of sensory cannibalism upon the self's organs of stimuli and the neurochemicals that make their functioning possible.

>> No.19731378

>>19731330
>In the elementary particles there is a scene where Bruno explains that people who can satisfy their sexual desires easily need more extreme stimuli
> In the elementary particles there is a scene where Bruno explains that people who can satisfy their sexual desires easily need more extreme stimuli

This seems so common sensical that it has to be true, has anyone offered a good counter argument?

>> No.19731379
File: 343 KB, 640x877, 1641934349498.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19731379

“Bhikkhus, there are three things that give no satiation by indulging in them. What three? (1) There is no satiation by indulging in sleep. (2) There is no satiation by indulging in liquor and wine. (3) There is no satiation by indulging in sexual intercourse. These are the three things that give no satiation by indulging in them.”

Source: AN. Book of the Threes. Sutta 108

>> No.19731380
File: 33 KB, 260x381, The_International_Jew,_Nov._1920_-_1st_Edition_by_Henry_Ford.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19731380

>>19731330
Start with this.

>> No.19731436

>>19731330
Read the bhagavad gita

>> No.19731449
File: 111 KB, 1200x1200, 4169.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19731449

>>19731372
Is that the nerve attenuation syndrome (NAS) I've heard about in Johnny Mnemonic? Sounds like when Johnny asks Spider what causes 'the black shakes' and Spider goes around his makeshift underground operating room slapping electronic monitors and machines of all kind, saying >This causes it! Information overload! All the electronics around you poisoning the airwaves. Technological fucking civilization! But we still have all this shit, because we can't live without it

>> No.19731455

>>19731379
I'm well-satisfied by a single alcoholic drink. Also, I could easily never drink again. So fuck that idiot boozehound.

>> No.19731458

>>19731449
Pretty much

>> No.19731468

>>19731342
This is why you go into periods of pious chastity so that the decadence is fresh again after a while

>> No.19731478

They weren't in it for personal reasons, they were managera for mossad. Their job was to blackmail powerful people. Why those powerful people are so easy to control with underage prostitutes is a different story.

>> No.19731861

>>19731478
>hey were managera for mossad
This