Autism weaponized

[Anonymous No.19710395]

Would it be possible to break science by constantly asking "what do you mean by x?" , "what do you mean by y?", "define z"

[Anonymous No.19710408]

>>19710395
I don't know, but definitely you can easily break a human just asking questions like that.

[Anonymous No.19710413]

Yes. You will get to the point where there is no right answer. Everything relies on intuition.

[Anonymous No.19710416]

It would be possible to "break" anything like that. Hence picrel's refutation of that style of enquiry (I'm personally not entirely convinced he had it all right though).
Most sciences begin with "primitive notions" anyway. These are things you just accept exist for the sake of enquiry.

[Anonymous No.19710425]

>>19710413
he just "broke" science saying that. "what method is intuition?" "what do you mean by prove" when you're moving at such a level everything will seem brainlet, and unfortunately have a tendency to actually become brainlet most of the time.

[Anonymous No.19710462]

>>19710395