Egoism as a practice in masculinity

[Anonymous No.19680391]

Egoist anarchism, despite common misconceptions, is entirely masculine. Similar to stoicism, Stirner’s philosophy advocates for an active approach to the world and rejects the feminine passivity of being enslaved to fixed ideas (God, the state, morality, private property, truth, etc.) Instead of allowing himself to be measured by these ideals, he becomes his own measurement - and hence his own man! No other thinker before him had completely renounced the submissiveness of thought so thoroughly. Some of you will object to my use of the word ‘masculine’ in an egoist context, but I assure you that I do not harbor any bats in my belfry about essences or natures. It is merely a tool, like all thought, to get my point across. A masculine anarchist! Truly something that deserves our utmost attention.

[Anonymous No.19680421]

I think being submissive (which you attribute to femininity) is more an active or concious act than getting spooked is.

But let's grant you your gendered characterization, as long as you don't let "being unspooked" become a spook.

[Anonymous No.19680678]

>>19680391
Basically just nietzsche but retarded

[Anonymous No.19680743]

>>19680391
Egoist transhumanism > egoist anarchism

[Anonymous No.19680746]

>>19680678
I think the two go well together. Stirner could be viewed as the hammer for Nietzsche’s philosophical enterprise.

[Anonymous No.19680828]

>>19680391
You shouldn't use a social construct (gender) as a variable for any system. You'll get schizophrenia