[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 239 KB, 1200x1799, jordan.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19656246 No.19656246[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

heya, /lit/, I ben reading based and redpilled authors like jordan peterson, mike cernovich, scott adams, and mark manson.
just wandering if you know sim authors who are based and redpilled. mainly wanna read self-improv books, not a lot of politics, tho obv someone with a based and redpilled take on politics could be worth a spot on me shelf.

>> No.19656249 [DELETED] 

>>19656246
5/10

>> No.19656255

Based based cringe cringe based based based

>> No.19656261

>>19656249
I thought his book was worth more but wateva, who then???

>> No.19656265

>>19656246
i hate this fucking board sometimes
literature, you retarded homosexuals
>LIT
>ER
>AT
>URE

>> No.19656270

>>19656246
Try Zizek

>> No.19656295

>>19656246
Master baiter

>> No.19656337
File: 40 KB, 960x737, 1614537947967.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19656337

>>19656249
2/10 for me, little effort in bait

>> No.19656792

/pol/ was a mistake (yes I know it's bait)

>> No.19656964
File: 141 KB, 1262x634, jp.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19656964

lmao

>> No.19658099
File: 398 KB, 756x494, FCCC40B3-C7AE-4C38-ADB6-7151F9CC528D.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19658099

>>19656246
Just remember…
>makes commies seethe
>makes nazis seethe
>makes Twitter seethe
>makes trannies seethe
>makes Canadian government seethe
>makes SJWs seethe
>every time he opens his mouth some lefty breadtuber has to make a 3 hour character assassination video

All because he tries to help men find meaning and purpose.

He is more based than words describe.

>> No.19658121

>>19658099

>canadian government

You already mentioned trannies and SJWs

>> No.19658286

>>19658121
kek
>>19658099
>makes nazis seethe
0.01$ have been credited to your zogbot account

>> No.19658433

>>19658099
He's OK, I'll give you that, Maps of Meaning is a very nice read.
That's it, though.

>> No.19658459
File: 394 KB, 640x610, 1640750549294.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19658459

>>19656265
>he doesn't know how to break literature up in syllables

>> No.19658482

>>19658433
Hey man at least you read it.

>> No.19658519

>>19658121
fuck I wish our gov was only as bad as trans SJWs

>>19658459
The pronunciation varies by region and hey maybe you shouldn't be shitting on language that deviates from America's shitty surviving vestiges of the british empire's propaganda. but yes most 4channers are retarded. very redpilled of you to notice.

>> No.19658528

Bill Cooper

>> No.19658543

Hi leftypol. Reminder that your ideology is based on Christianity, tee-hee! ;)

>> No.19658556

>>19658099
I don't think he really does anymore. Kind of a nobody

>> No.19658562

>>19658433
This one is pretty impressive and has 47 million views:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yZYQpge1W5s

>> No.19658696

>>19658099
I unironically respected him more after it came out he was addicted to bennies. Man became a world renowned multimillionaire author in his FIFTIES all while simultaneously being perpetually slizzed. This motherfucker on 50% managed to build an empire, comfortably situate himself in the heads of millions rent fucking free and STILL helped more men than any dipshit breadtranny jewtuber ever has or will. WHAT THE FUCK IS HIS PROBLEM?

>> No.19658748

>>19658099
He's a good entry-level redpill and very well-spoken (wow he thinks gender roles might be important and we shouldn't capitulate to the will of mentally ill crybullies, in any normal society this goes without saying) but countless other personalities are much better. The fact he makes borderline mentally retard leftist niggers seethe is funny and proof of their derangement.

>> No.19658759

>>19658543
It's so funny that thlse godless idiots don't even understand that their pussy worldview directly comes from degenerated christianity. Jesuits were the ones who invented the concept of "social justice" in the first place.

>> No.19658774

>>19656246
Marginalized people should not have to defend their basic humanity against their oppresors. Are you denying science are you denying white supremacy and structural racism are a thing are you denying the queer community's right to exist?

Marginalized folks have every reason to trust progressive bourgeoisie and managerial strata over fascist white settlers who want them dead.we have every right to deplatform fascists and reactionaries and class reductionists and science deniers and ensure safety for marginalized and vulnerable members of our communities. We have every right to demand the destigmatization and normalization of sex work and mental illness, decolonization prison abolition family abolition the sexual enmancipation of children and an end to white supremacy and the gender binary.

>> No.19658784

>>19658543
By this point being homophobic or transphobic practically counts as a form of anti clericalism. At least the old christian clergy kept the child raping at a respectable level, kept alive the cultural tradition of the west the new cultural marxist clergy wants to brainwash us pedophilia is actually progressive and normal, their only culture is shitty corporate propaganda. I mean what have leftists and their corporate masters ever done if not replace christ on the cross with a pink haired obese faggot on a wheelchair? Except the queer wont grant me eternal life or even forgive me for the sins of my bigotted white ancestors. I m just saying it'd be pretty funny if we could get together two planks of wood and a bucketfull of nails and actually crucify that fucker for real.

>> No.19658796

>>19658121
As a straight man who is recovering from radicalization coming to terms with his privilege and prejudices towards the queer community i am looking forwards to reading some science or theory which can help me better appreciate the awful plight the diverse and vibrant culture of these ̶w̶a̶r̶m̶ ̶b̶o̶d̶y̶ ̶p̶o̶l̶i̶t̶i̶c̶a̶l̶l̶y̶ ̶c̶o̶r̶r̶e̶c̶t̶ ̶v̶i̶c̶t̶i̶m̶h̶o̶o̶d̶ ̶u̶n̶i̶t̶ ̶N̶P̶C̶s̶,̶ ̶p̶u̶r̶p̶o̶s̶e̶ ̶e̶n̶g̶i̶n̶e̶e̶r̶e̶d̶ ̶b̶i̶o̶p̶o̶l̶i̶t̶i̶c̶a̶l̶ ̶c̶l̶i̶e̶n̶t̶e̶l̶e̶ ̶f̶o̶r̶t̶h̶e̶ ̶m̶a̶n̶a̶g̶e̶r̶i̶a̶l̶ ̶s̶t̶a̶t̶e̶ ̶p̶h̶a̶r̶m̶a̶c̶e̶u̶t̶i̶c̶a̶l̶s̶ ̶a̶n̶d̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶ ̶d̶e̶m̶o̶c̶r̶a̶t̶i̶c̶ ̶p̶a̶r̶t̶y̶,̶, I mean these most noble and progressive these most pitiful and wretched of creatures. Any recs? my deepseated heteronormative prejudices cant help but flare up at the beautiful and heartwarming display of diversity and progress in pic related. Should i report to a local psychiatrist or HR commisar for reeducation?

>> No.19658888

>>19656246
>Perhaps one of the most disturbing attempts to undermine families can be seen in a slick video produced by LGBT in the City, a multi-media organization that produces talk shows and videos related to LGBT issues and is sponsored by such monster corporations as Telus and TD Bank. To say LGBT in the City has a hedonistic focus would be a grotesque understatement and it might be argued that at least one of their videos encourages the sexualization of children, specifically in the form of an eight year old boy mockingly named “Lactacia.”

>In a slick video released on Facebook with over one million views so far, a hyper-feminized/sexualized 8 year old boy (who some have compared to a drag version of JonBenét Ramsey) is featured partying in a hypersexual adult LGBT environment and telling kids watching that if their parents or friends do not support their desire to be drag (or trans), they need to get new parents and friends. Professional quality video and editing made this call to young children to the queer lifestyle all the more appealing. As “Lactatia” speaks to his peers, while an all too happy host leers, bold text leaps out at the viewer saying “YOU NEED NEW PARENTS! YOU NEED NEW FRIENDS!” You too can be a drag queen or transgender superstar and perhaps head out on the town to party with the wild LGBT boys and “Lactatia.” If your parents won’t get on board, they can simply be replaced with a new “glitter family.”

If anything petersom radically UNDERestimated the totalitarian and paedophilic implications of cultural marxism and the lgbtsjwtfnpc agenda

>> No.19658903

>>19658888
There is literally nothing wrong with this. The heterosexual nuclear family is a tool of patriarchal oppression, as such it must be dismantled children should be liberated from judeochristian gender norms and sexual repression through a process of decolonization led by HIV positive BIPOC sex workers and decolonial feminist gender pedagogues in every public school and media outlet regardless of the reactionary opinions of their white settler parents.

>> No.19658913

>>19656246
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m9Njk8vpToQ

>> No.19658953

>>19658888
This . if you support 'trans rights' or 'gay rights' this is what you are supporting. By this point its undeniable unless you are fucking blind.

>> No.19659196

>>19658888
>>19658953
i am shocked and offended anon but I feel like this video might be a little cherry picked. and that kidnap child molestation glitter senpaitachi or continuing to stigmatize and brutilize LGBT people might be a bit of a false dichotomy

>> No.19659225

>>19659196
Le corporate social engineering and propaganda community

>> No.19659243

>>19659196
if these it what happens when you stop stigmatizing and brutalizing them then maybe it wasnt a bad idea after all. If you give them an inch they will take a mile

>> No.19659251

>>19659196
10 years ago this would have been unimaginable now people are afraid to speak out against it. I cant imagine were we will be in 10 years if no action is taken to stop this ideology

>> No.19659308

>>19659196
The old trick of cowardly hiding behind political correctness and victimhood in order to rape groom abuse and indoctrinate children on a deliberate and systematic basis.

>> No.19659377

>>19656246
I know OP is a shitpost but if you want some actual authors that are valuable to "based and redpilled" right wingers I'd suggest the Italian school of elitism (Pareto, Michels, Mosca) and modern paleocon elite theorists like Paul Gottfried. Even reading post-modernists like Baudrillard or Foucault is more valuable than most of what's going on in the cesspit that is the American Right at the moment.

>> No.19659415

>>19659377
Quick rundown of Pareto, Michels, Mosca, Gottfried?

>> No.19659437

>>19659377
Well that's just because the modern world is full pants on head retarded. This is just what happens when you overeducate the midwits.

>> No.19659447

>>19659415
Iron Law of Oligarchy and the best theories of how elites drive society that you will find. Gottfried is the intellect behind modern paleoconservatism, which looked like it was making a comeback during the Trump era, but then got btfo by neocons and retarded conservaboomers ruining everything. It's basically the only faction of the Right that isn't evil and/or completely braindead these days.

>> No.19659471

>>19659437
I'd say that actually makes the right look worse. There's no reason why a group that supposedly stands for tradition against the modern world should be even more consumed by its retardation than the intellectual elites on the left, but it looks like that's the case. The right has zero alternative elites capable enough to fight and replace the existing ones, hence it will always lose. Jim-bob the redneck, his maga buddies, and the hordes of grifters are too dumb to do the job.

>> No.19659748

>>19659471
Nah, the downfall of the left will be organic and internal. I think all of the right could disappear tomorrow and everything would still be on track for a collapse.

It's literally just what happens with ever growing bureaucracy that you have to support for your views and success coupled with over educated midwits who all clamor to be a part of the bureaucracy (since their education really doesn't afford them much else).

Every academic who agreed to stay with universities once they started overeducating the midwits is part of the problem desu. They're also all intwined in deep academic bureaucracies so I'm not really surprised they allowed it. Cucked to the systems that be.

>> No.19659774

>>19656246
He definitely has some qualities that people who use the term "redpilled" unironically would deem as "redpilled", yeah.

In other words, if your parents didn't teach you the basic societal behaviors you need in order to be a functional human being and you have access to basic needs, then yeah, his books are the logical next step.

>> No.19659807

>>19659774
>In other words, if your parents didn't teach you the basic societal behaviors you need in order to be a functional human being
So the majority of Gen Z then?

>> No.19659821

>>19656964
That's from Gravity's Rainbow you actual retard.

>> No.19659866

>>19658099
you can read Marcus Aurelius and Marie Kondo to get the same effect of reading Jordan Peterson, but without any of the contemporary political whining

>> No.19660222

woah 45 replies and yet nothing of value was said nor was a book recommended

>> No.19660362

>>19659377
op here
wasnt a shitpost, man. I know my authors arent to everyones taste on politics, but I thought self-improv they pretty tight
tough crowd tho

>> No.19660427

>>19656246
"Peterson’s ideas are a mishmash of banal self-help, amateur philosophy, superfluous Christian mythology, evidence-free Jungian psychology, and toxic individualistic politics. Seek enlightenment elsewhere."

>> No.19661091
File: 8 KB, 154x216, thagard.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19661091

>>19660427
The guy who said this is pretty fucking ugly, not sure I believe him

>> No.19661105

>>19659447
>intellect
>paleoconservatism

>> No.19661120
File: 49 KB, 858x424, Juden.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19661120

>>19656246

>> No.19661128

>>19661120
Don't forget this
https://www.jordanbpeterson.com/psychology/on-the-so-called-jewish-question/

>> No.19661138

>>19660427
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/hot-thought/201802/jordan-peterson-s-flimsy-philosophy-life
This is some of the worst shit I've ever read

>> No.19661239

>>19656246
Read the Vahinis:

https://www.sathyasai.org/media/ebooks

>> No.19661296

>>19658759
>Jesuits were the ones who invented the concept of "social justice" in the first place.
Plato spoke about social justice in The Republic, you fucking idiot.

>> No.19661573

This guy, amirite. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2018/09/24/jordan-peterson-dishes-out-what-he-sees-harsh-truths-can-he-take-them-return

>> No.19661705
File: 77 KB, 1050x615, down-girl-cap.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19661705

>>19661573
Based, women like this should be jailed

>> No.19661728

Is there anyone here that does not see the simple "guilt/dishonor by association" that is being done here?

Come on guys you are better then falling for some low IQ smear champaign

>> No.19661810

>>19658774
>.we have every right to deplatform fascists and reactionaries and class reductionists and science deniers and ensure safety for marginalized and vulnerable members of our communities. We have every right to demand the destigmatization and normalization of sex work and mental illness, decolonization prison abolition family abolition the sexual enmancipation of children and an end to white supremacy and the gender binary.
Have you considered that none of this shit is good for society? Or are you willing to sacrifice Western civilization in the name of equality?
And you wonder why we want you gone. You're a golem of destruction.

>> No.19661847

>>19661810

Yep.

This will fly over most peoples heads, but needs to be posted

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SBrRFS1R2J8

>> No.19661865

>>19661810
>the sexual enmancipation of children
You are replying to bait.

>> No.19661908

>>19658774
>You are not a victim
>You are not talking for victims.
>You are a predator, talking for predators

>> No.19661935

>>19656246
this whole site is stuck in 2016 I hate all of you. I had the fucking temerity to come to this board out of some misplaced thought, "Wow, I wonder what /lit/ could be up to?" and I come to see something that I would have seen near six fucking years ago. If this post's content could walk and talk it would be in first grade and the OP would probably be not allowed within 2000 feet of it. Fuck this place. Bye.

>> No.19661981

>>19661865
If something is 5% bait and 95% mainstream left-wing agenda, it's not bait.

>> No.19662368

>>19658774
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5XOaYMkz5Cc

>> No.19662522

>>19658562
>"I'm a credible scientist"
>Has a degree in psychology
>Makes books about philosophy he hasn't read or doesn't understand

>> No.19662899

>>19662522
>Hasn't read

Clearly you have no idea what you're talking about

>> No.19662934

>>19662899
Actually, I do know what I'm talking about. I could explain to you in great detail why I know Peterson hasn't read Foucault, because I've read Peterson's three books and I've read what he says without eloquence nor any method about Foucault's thought. This is a glorified cult leader, buddy. He stepped out of his line and has no idea what he's talking about.

>> No.19662939

>>19662899
Or better yet: why don't *you* tell me what Peterson thinks affiliates foucaldian thought to marxist analysis? I need a good chuckle.

>> No.19663297

>>19662934
Foucault was a retard and so are you

>> No.19663304

>>19659866
I prefer the political criticism, tranny.

>> No.19663310

>>19662939
Both tranny social constructivists who hate Western civilization and want to see it collapse

>> No.19663349

>>19663310
Explain to me what social constructivism means.

>> No.19663355
File: 64 KB, 640x652, 9bkxnimpak371.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19663355

>>19656246

>> No.19663372
File: 1.68 MB, 2970x2483, 1624115311405.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19663372

>>19663349
Rejection of reality

>> No.19663607

>>19662934
Explain it then. Peterson taught at Harvard so the onus is on you here

>> No.19663626

>>19662934
>read 3 books from someone he hates to seethe about him online
Why are commies so autistic?

>> No.19663633

>>19663626
>avoiding books because you disagree with them

Brainlet behavior

>> No.19663636

>>19663633
>you either completely avoid someone or you read 3 books of his
Commie brain hard at work

>> No.19663641

>>19663607
Peterson teaches psychology not postmodern philosphy lmao. Also, Foucault explicitly rejects the marxist framework in every single one of his books. He dedicated his entire career to finding ways he could contradict the marxists or distract people from marxist analysis. Peterson's claim that Foucault is a neomarxist because he deals with power relations is the most moronic statement any writers with such a major audience could make and it's been debunked many times. Foucault describes power relations as localized, constantly mutating and unrelated to social roles. Marx thinks class is oppressive in a monolithic and all-encompassing way. They're absolute contradictions. You do realize Peterson is seen as a clown by anyone with a little bit of in-depth philosophical knowledge, right?

>> No.19663654

>>19663641
>Peterson's claim that Foucault is a neomarxist because he deals with power relations
He's correct

>> No.19663667

>>19663654
>s the most moronic statement any writers with such a major audience could make and it's been debunked many times. Foucault describes power relations as localized, constantly mutating and unrelated to social roles. Marx thinks class is oppressive in a monolithic and all-encompassing way. They're absolute contradictions.
There, fixed it for you.

>> No.19663668

>>19663641
>Marx thinks class is oppressive in a monolithic and all-encompassing way.
Marx was not a neomarxist

>> No.19663676

>>19663667
>Foucault is not a neomarxist because he sees power relations as dynamic as opposed to marx who was a marxist
Not a coherent argument. Neomarxism reshuffled the structure of the power dynamics

>> No.19663681

>>19663668
And so dealing with power relations the exact opposite way Marx deals with them is not being a neomarxist. There are philosophers of individualism and private property who dealt with power relations before and after Marx: are they proto/neomarxists? Was Adam Smith a proto-marxist lmao? Do you realize how moronic Peterson is now? Probably not, that's fine.

>> No.19663690

>>19663681
By dealing with power relations, right-wingers mean power relations from a socially constructivist perspective, not any discussion of power relations. You purposefully misrepresent the argument because you're disingenuous.

>> No.19663693

>>19663676
>Neomarxism reshuffled the structure of the power dynamics
You have absolutely no knowledge of neomarxism. Neomarxists (Friot, Clouscard, Althusser, etc._ all engage in class-based analysis of capitalism as an oppressive system. Foucault doesn't even maintain the validity of class in his analysis of power relations, and most importantly, he rejects the economical analysis of power, which he conceives as an unfixed, elusive and non unilaterally hierarchical phenomenon. I don't even know why I'm trying to explain this to retard Peterson stans but hey...

>> No.19663707

>>19663690
Absolutely not. YOU are misrepresenting Peterson as smarter than he is. I have literally read the guy. He does not go in depth with his "foucaldian critique" at all. You don't even know what social constructivism means, probably. Peterson himself is a social constructivist, he just presents himself as "less extreme" and more engaged towards meaning and tradition. Appeals to tradition are inevitably socio-constructivists you dumb fuck. Omggggggggg

>> No.19663709

>>19663693
Neomarxists are defined by right-wingers as those who extend the oppressor-oppressed dynamic beyond class to race/gender/etc. No one cares what your trannies defined it as.

>> No.19663724

>>19663709
This is just another way of saying "right-wingers have no idea what the philosophical concepts they mobilize mean so they're arguing from strawmen" which is EXACTLY my point. Thank you. Also, by that definition Peterson would be a neomarxist since he NEVER denies there are gender and race-based oppressive relationships, just that social interactions hold more than simply systemic oppression. You don't even know what your own guru thinks, lol.

>> No.19663729

>>19663707
>Appeals to tradition are inevitably socio-constructivists you dumb fuck.
Once again being disingenous. Accepting that humans create culture is not being a social constructivist. Peterson is a Christian so he cannot be a social constructivist because he doesn't believe knowledge and beliefs are created primarily via the interaction of humans in society.
>Omggggggggg
What the fuck is wrong with you sperg? Are you a woman or a tranny?

>> No.19663733

>>19663724
No, it's another way of saying that right-wingers don't care about your semantic games. They don't like oppressive dynamics regardless of object, and they call you communists or neomarxists when they make a slight effort to be more accurate.
>he NEVER denies there are gender and race-based oppressive relationships
Why would he deny it if it's true? Women are inferior to men, non-whites are inferior to whites. This is just empiricism, not tranny theory.

>> No.19663744

>>19663733
I love this mask off Peterson staning. You've proven every single one of my points multiple times over. By the way, being wrong about everything does not mean you're strategically avoiding the other person's malevolence. It means you're stupid. xo

>> No.19663748

>>19663744
Ok retard 40% yourself

>> No.19663853

>>19663709
>Neomarxists are defined by right-wingers as those who extend the oppressor-oppressed dynamic beyond class to race/gender/etc.
You realize postmodernist philosophers don't do that, right? Postmodernists don't even think power is oppressive per say. Foucault defined power rather as a force; a mechanical action in a way, constantly moving and shifting targets. He's very positivist in that sense. This is no philosopher of systemic oppression, at least not in the sense identity politics have given it - identity politics aren't postmodern at all of course, yet they are what Peterson specifically targets. And he doesn't only misunderstand, or insidiously misrepresent, postmodernism: he also has a very dubious conception of marxism, but so does the average american. Oh well...
Two quick questions: how are identity politics "postmodern", exactly? And most importantly, how is postmodernism about power struggle rather than anarchy?

>> No.19663869

>>19663748
Also, congrats for showing so generously how Peterson isn't about helping men find meaning but really about justifying men in their bigotry and hatred for others.

>> No.19663969

>>19663853
>how are identity politics "postmodern", exactly?
They are based on a rejection of objective truth i.e. biology. They believe women and men should be equal because gender is a social construct, and so on.
>And most importantly, how is postmodernism about power struggle rather than anarchy?
Postmodernism isn't about power struggle. I don't see where I mentioned postmodernism in my post, but postmodernism can and has been co-opted by neomarxists to reject objective truth and instead replace it with their own narrative. This doesn't mean postmodernism leads to that, but it was used for that i.e. mainly for attacking the established order (Christianity, Western values) and then neomarxists attempted to replace the void with their own religion.
The rest of your post is just you being obtuse.

>> No.19663976

>>19663869
>ongrats for showing
You'll see whatever you feel like seeing because you're a dumb communist.

>> No.19664072

>>19663969
>Postmodernism isn't about power struggle.
Peterson begs to differ. This is precisely why he links it to marxism in 12 Rules for Life. But even then, marxism isn't really about power struggle either, it's about class struggle; power finds its beginning and end with class dynamics, which is not at all the way postmodernists conceive things. In truth Peterson isn't really interested in marxist theory. He's using the american "marxist" boogeyman just to make his critique of identity politics more dramatic. But it has nothing to do with either marxism or neomarxism, unless you twist those words to a point where they become meaningless.
I'm willing to accept identity politics are "postmodern", but they have nothing to do with marxism.

>> No.19664103

>>19663976
And you're a dumb fascist who holds on to the delusions of some bastardized version of a fantasy book just because it helps you feel superior to others. You're literally doing what you accuse others of doing: you're living in this echo chamber of self-validating delusional discourse. I wonder how you reconcile that with biology by the way.

>> No.19664114

>>19656246
Based thread

>> No.19664156

>>19664072
>I'm willing to accept identity politics are "postmodern", but they have nothing to do with marxism.
Yes they do, they took the marxist framework and put it over race relations instead of class relations. You don't like it because you're a marxist embarrassed by the current state of neomarxism, but no one cares about that.
>>19664103
You're projecting

>> No.19664577

>>19664103
>>19663869
>>19663869

I mean have you tried bringing up any books around your local lgbtsjwtfnpc marxist cattle? In no time you will see their beady stupid cowlike eyes light up in panic. Soon enough they will start with the usual subhuman bleating "wasnt he sexist? Arent you being dangerously eurocentric? Hasnt it been debunked as fake news russian bot pseudoscience?Why read books by dead white men when you could have been streaming the latest diverse and inclusive workplace comedies at netflix hulu and disneyplus? your daily mandatory dose of ''ethically sourced'' child pornography? Didnt you know reading antything beyond YA literature is ableist towards people who are too retarded to read? How does this further the short term electoral goals of the democratic party? Are you saying child sex workers arent real sex workers?Have you been taking your daily recomended dose of high fructuouse corn syrup your SSRIs and HRT? it is very important that you take the medication dr goldstein prescribed otherwise we will report you to corporate for mandatory sensitivity training as per the domestic terrorism act of 2021"

>> No.19664591

>>19661105
paul gottfried and weininger arethe only based kikes

>> No.19664593

>>19663744
>mask off Peterson staning
Go back to whatever tranny discord you crawled out of

>> No.19664599

>>19664103
>fascist

Yikes.

>> No.19664600

>>19660427
it.the left just want to replace the family with a managerial state which is more intrusive than 'traditional values' ever were. you need a massive effectively totalitarian bureaucracy of experts, psychiatrists, media elites, a snivelling priesthood of pedophilic lgbtsjwtfnpc apparatchiks, to ensure people are properly 'liberated' ie. ground down into an ideological monoculture. the real reason leftists oppose 'traditional values' because they are npcs who have been programmed to go against anything that gets in the way of the goals of their corporate masters: total centralized control and exploitation. leftists are like crabs in a bucket, dragging down anyone who tries to rise out of nigger status.

>> No.19664607

>>19664600
They literally only have one trick "oy vey there is some injustice here, give me tyrannical power so I can prevent that happening, I wont abuse it lol"

>> No.19664612

>>19664103
I mean if the politically correct lgbtsjwtfnpc crowd are going to call you a 'fascist' for not wanting children to get molested, for the crime of reading old books, not wanting to be second class citizen in your own country or daring to have thoughts unapproved by corporate media, then one can't help but start wondering, can 'fascism' be all that bad?

>> No.19664644

>>19664600
Read the article where the quote comes from, nothing but religion bashing, tranny apologetics, and claims that Peterson is "anti science". These people are less than human

>> No.19664719

>>19663853
this, foucault is actually a nietszchean and a right wing libertarian or liberal conservative. reading foucault actually made me far more racist(in his book society must be defended he epically trolls marxists by claming the base of all politics is race war) and transphobic and distrustful of marxism and identity politics. he would have hated the attempts of the LGBT ideology to ground sexual identity on supposed scientific authority.

>> No.19664735

>>19664719
>conservative
Ok retard
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_petition_against_age_of_consent_laws

>> No.19664746

>>19664735
>implying pederasty is not trad AF

>> No.19664839

>>19663869
i mean, by these point it is obvious trannies are not a handful of harmless perverts who want to be left alone. they are highly disturbed and ideological, backed by powerful corporate interests, intolerant of any criticism and creepily fixated on the indoctrination of children. these are not happy liberated unique individuals but consumer cattle with pink hair, mindlessly bleating out ideological slogans.

>> No.19664856
File: 2 KB, 125x84, 1640821996132s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19664856

>>19664644
This.the LGBT identity is fully based on science and evidence, not even heterosexuality is backed by as much Hard data. instead of relying on sexual repression and christian religious superstition you should catch up to the 21s century and embrace an identity based on objective scientific and psychiatric criteria.

>> No.19665070

>>19659807
Sure

>> No.19665393

>>19659196
there are many such cases and they seem to be getting bolder and bolder. experience has shown these 'people' are deranged, they want us broke, dead our children raped and brainwashed and they think its all pretty funny, violence is the only language they understand.

>> No.19665408

>>19659196
The year is 20xx you have been ordered by your local globohomo comissar to attend a state sponsored screening of star wars XXVIII: avengers assemble. On the way there you pass by the daily george floyd memorial pride blm mcdonalds parade a fabulous twerking troupe of boy catamites followed by the phallic missiles of the lockheed float.missiles set to launch at midnight (mercifully) wiping the human race off the Face of the earth.when you arrive at the theater, bill nye, the science guy and alexandra ocasio cortez strap you into a chair forcing your eyes open clockwork orange style, the screen flickers on instead of space adventures or superheroes the audience is treated to what looks like blurry slow mo vhs footage of a pack of bluehaired fat positive queers raping an innocent white child intersped with blipverts for the latest techproduct. The braindead leftists in the audience chant YAS KWEEN SLAY at what they cant help but see as a beautiful and heartwarming display of diversity and progress. The queers start ripping appart the child and feasting on its bloody entrails like rabid hogs at the through. You sit on the front row and think: "gee i shouldve joined the alt right before it was too late"

The year is 20xx you have been ordered by your local globohomo comissar to attend a state sponsored screening of star wars XXVIII: avengers assemble. On the way there you pass by the daily george floyd memorial pride blm mcdonalds parade a fabulous twerking troupe of boy catamites followed by the phallic missiles of the lockheed float.missiles set to launch at midnight (mercifully) wiping the human race off the Face of the earth.when you arrive at the theater, bill nye, the science guy and alexandra ocasio cortez strap you into a chair forcing your eyes open clockwork orange style, the screen flickers on instead of space adventures or superheroes the audience is treated to what looks like blurry slow mo vhs footage of a pack of bluehaired fat positive queers raping an innocent white child intersped with blipverts for the latest techproduct. The braindead leftists in the audience chant YAS KWEEN SLAY at what they cant help but see as a beautiful and heartwarming display of diversity and progress. The queers start ripping appart the child and feasting on its bloody entrails like rabid hogs at the through. You sit on the front row and think: "gee i shouldve joined the alt right before it was too late"

>> No.19665588

>>19663626
>>19663636
>don't read
this is /lit/