[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 31 KB, 657x539, 6807b07a68d7aa045e2bfeebedee7d7d.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19630731 No.19630731 [Reply] [Original]

>plato
>descartes
>kant

>> No.19630911

Why the seething, OP?

>> No.19630923

>>19630731
Rationalism > empiricism

>> No.19631164

>>19630923
based

>> No.19631453

>>19630731

Can I just skip Descartes and everything in English philosophy except Hume? Descartes seems intelligent but maladroit, like he just ended up being wrong about absolutely everything. And has weird quizzical shit ideas that don't amount to anything

The gameplan is Plato -> Aristotle -> Hume -> Kant

Is this legit?

>> No.19631460

>>19631453
Add back Descartes and Husserl after Kant.

>> No.19631470

>>19631460

Based. I like Hobbes based on a partial reading of Leviathan we did in college. Is Hobbes and Hume all the island had to offer on terms of formidable thinkers? Is Bacon and English empiricist shit worth reading? Or even utilitarianism? Or Berkeley?

>> No.19631590

>>19630923
Based

>> No.19631626

deh-scar-tehz