[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 26 KB, 597x559, 1618868409451.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19581072 No.19581072 [Reply] [Original]

>See people here parroting the idea that Nietzsche didn't read much
>Read a few pages of The Anti-Christ
>Already realize he is very familiar with German idealism and Biblical literature (even if he rejects both)
>Read a bit about his biography
>Classical philologist
You guys lied to me.

>> No.19581123

>>19581072
Litards are dumbasses, what else is new?

>> No.19581231

>>19581072
he did say "we don't read books because we're too busy living!" or something to that extent somewhere

>> No.19581290 [DELETED] 

>actually believes people on lit have a clue what they're talking about
>eventually finds out lit actually made him more stupid
many such cases

you think the same people that tell you going to plumber school instead of college have a clue about anything?

>> No.19581296

>>19581072
>>Already realize he is very familiar with German idealism
He didn't know all that much about German Idealism except Schopenhauer.

>> No.19581401

>>19581296
He frequently references Kant, though mostly in a negative light, and many of his views on aesthetics are polemic to Schlegel's his contemporaries'

>> No.19581430

>>19581401
His entire understanding of Kant just comes from Schopenhauer.

>> No.19581596

>>19581430
>>19581401
He critiques German philosophy as a whole for taking too much from Kant. He calls them the descendants of theologians who had the audacity of believing that Kant was a turn for the better. Either he read them or he is talking out of his ass.

>> No.19581610

>>19581596
He criticised Kant for things which Schopenhauer misunderstood Kant on.

>> No.19581689
File: 146 KB, 600x600, 1639525001673.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19581689

>didn't read much
>chair of philology at basel
No shit he read

>> No.19581786

>>19581072
He actually didnt read the German Idealists up to his last years in Turin. For most of his life assumed that Schopenhauer's accounts of German idealist philosophy were accurate: he discovered that they werent once he tried reading Hegel. Somewhere there's a letter od his to Pietro Gast, in which he basically regrets to have trusted Schopenhauer, and in which he claimed that Hegel was actually a philosophical ally of his. It somewhat makes sense, once you keep in mind Hegel's critique of morality and virtue, his notion of "death of God", his complete immanentism, and many other aspects of his philosophy.
He had a similar experience with Spinoza. Earlier in his career he thought that he was a standard Jewish philosopher, but when he ended up actually reading him he claimed that Spinoza was his "predecessor".

>> No.19581853

>>19581072
literally nobody has ever said this about nietzsche and you are just making shit up. everybody knows he was an incel bookworm.

>> No.19581897
File: 734 KB, 1106x1012, 1637703753298.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19581897

>>19581786
So Schoppa misinterpreted them and then Nietzsche just took his word for it? Why do we take those clowns seriously again?

>> No.19581910

>>19581897
No that was all bullshit I completely made up and you just took me at my word.

>> No.19581914

>>19581910
Kek

>> No.19581926

>>19581786
>He actually didnt read the German Idealists up to his last years in Turin.
He dabbled in them in the early 80's, since he praises them and criticises Schopenhauer's criticism of them.