/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.19551507]

The original Jordan Peterson

[Anonymous No.19551514]

>>19551507
Retard this a mystical renunciation not charging subhumans 1000$ for workshops

Stop comparing Dosto with that faggot hack

[Anonymous No.19551567]

>>19551507
He mean that you are your greatest obstacle, you fucking retard, not that you should wash your dick before revolting against anything.

[Anonymous No.19551576]

>>19551514
>>19551567
mediocre deadbrain parasites

[Anonymous No.19551586]

>>19551567
>implying Dosto wouldn't say to better yourself instead of starting a revolution
read demons, he was a full on religious reactionary

[Anonymous No.19551592]

>>19551586
His Demons meant people with bad intentions, thats it retard.

[Anonymous No.19551599]

>>19551592
The revolutionaries largely had good intentions to better society, they were just smoothbrains like you

[Anonymous No.19551611]

>>19551576
You overcome yourself by losing it in God. Without monkhood which isn't possible. How the fuck that leaf preaches renunciation? He teaches youth to take part in vanity fucked material world like hylic goblins same as himself

[Anonymous No.19551791]

>Dostoevsky
Racist chud. Do not engage.

[Anonymous No.19551832]

>>19551586
Can you sketch out Dostoevsky's political program from his writings?
Believing in the soul of the peasant meme and disliking the people he's portraying in demons is not in fact a coherent political program
For a man who belonged to various political organisations throughout his life, it is surprising how difficult it is to pin him down politically after his return from Siberia

[Anonymous No.19552158]

>>19551599
Hell is paved with good intentions

[Anonymous No.19553034]

he was truly based

[Anonymous No.19553096]

>>19551832
monarchism

[Anonymous No.19553315]

>>19551832
he obviously supported the monarchy but was heavily in favour of all sorts of liberal reforms and wasn't exactly happy with the way the monarchy was doing things. you could say he was a reactionary conservative on various social issues but liberal on economic issues, which is of course the most based thing one can be, and i think that could translate into modern politics in a few different ways from liberalism to fascism. problem is he both disliked liberalism for its limp writsted slippery slope nature, while also hating revolutionary violence which would be entailed in fascism. I guess it all depends on what values would win out in him in the end. if you want my opinion, if he saw how the world order of nihilism and "progress" have so thoroughly annihilated everything good and decent in society, he might be open to a little bit of violence lol.