/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.19467080]

>explains fascism perfectly
why haven't you read it?

[Anonymous No.19467095]

>written by a leftist boomer

[Anonymous No.19467097]

>>19467080
because it explains fascism perfectly

[Anonymous No.19467115]

>>19467080

Everyone always posts volume 1. No one ever remembers that it's a two-volume set.

[Anonymous No.19467135]

>>19467080
>Male fantasies sets forward the jarring — and ultimately horrifying as proposition that the fascist is not doing ‘something else,’ but doing what he wants to do.

[Anonymous No.19467140]

What about males that are monarchists?

[Anonymous No.19467167]

>>19467115
i just used that picture because i thought less people would recognize the new german edition which is both volumes plus a new long afterword. this is the edition i have

[v_v !!+e0M0fBMYzt No.19467183]

>>19467080
i have

>When I hear Monika talking about her clinical experience, it is not only academic theories of fascism that begin to appear inane: the very idea of producing a critique of them seems equally trivial. In fact, the whole effort would be superfluous if we had a convention for understanding and behaving, a way of listening that sensed the significance of all this for the theoretical pronouncements we deliver from on high: children committed to psychiatric care, who articulate in the language of the "deviant" or the dumb a whole system of disabilities that make up this life and who carry that system about with them in their own helplessly rebellious bodies, expressing it in images that compel any viewer to perceive their sickness as a superior form of innocent wholeness, though their bodies are said to have "broken down." When she tells me of contact, true contact with lightning and rolling thunder, of the production of an intimacy through the feeling and exploration of distances—an intimacy that is not consuming, distance that is not far away—a place where caution is a beautiful word, related to foresight and to a feeling for the reality of a suffering that wishes for change but is caught in impasse and double bind, I think then of the studied or hectic nonchalance of all those (myself included) who are striving to combat fascism here and now, but are blind to the experience of the nonfascist .. . at this point, the sentence seems to want to continue, "I begin to despair" (but this is the reality of a frozen semantics, not, in the end, of any feeling I might have).

[..]

>Monika and Margret Berger, veterans of clinical work with children, [The conditions of some of those children have a lot in common with the predicament of adult fascists, as we will see.] were also the ones who gave me most support whenever I, a person with no clinical experience, ventured to reformulate accepted psychoanalytic views on the fascistic type. I was working with nothing but patients' reports—soldier males wrote their memoirs in that form without realizing it—and with the terror enacted by these men. I am especially indebted to Margret Berger for her generally positive reaction to my thought on the ego-structure of the not-yet-fully-born (volume 2), as well as for her references to the psychoanalytic literature.

[Anonymous No.19467204]

>book putatively "explains" fascism
>isn't written by an actual fascist
Dropped

[v_v !!+e0M0fBMYzt No.19467214]

>>19467204
the first volume is full of diary entries of fascists

[Anonymous No.19467230]

>>19467080
I have, this shit changed my life.

[Anonymous No.19467231]

>>19467204
It's impossible for left and right to agree about the causes of fascism because they have different empirical priors. The question of whether communists were a real threat in interwar fascist countries is what basically the whole issue hinges on. If they were a real threat fascism becomes rather understandable, if they weren't it becomes irrational paranoia and lust of power and whatever other thing. Even if both sides agree that communist revolution may have occurred they dont agree on whether that would have been disastrous or not, they dont even agree on whether it *was* disastrous in the USSR and elsewhere, again both in empirical terms and in whether certain things were justified, if they did occur.

[Anonymous No.19467235]

>>19467080
You cant critique fascism without also being critical of communism, feminism or the neoliberal system.

[Anonymous No.19467247]

>>19467080
>Makes up own definition of fascism
>Explains
Yeah, its "perfect"
But yeah, its extremely faggy, protosoyboy rambling

[Anonymous No.19467248]

>>19467080
Because I'm a fascist. Why haven't you read Industrial Society and its Future, with its perfect explanation of leftism?

Don't you like being explained?

[Anonymous No.19467255]

>>19467080
>jewish mother and daddy issues
Why am I not surprised?

[Anonymous No.19467271]

>>19467214
No, it's full of diary entries of Freikorps soldiers. Fascism didn't even exist as a unified theory during the Bavarian Revolution

[v_v !!+e0M0fBMYzt No.19467279]

>>19467271
>Fascism didn't even exist as a unified theory during the Bavarian Revolution
it still doesn't

[Anonymous No.19467280]

>>19467214
wow, totally debunked him bro.
nobody has ever compiled quotes suggestively.

[Anonymous No.19467284]

>explains why fascism isn’t fascism
Wait what

[Anonymous No.19467285]

>>19467271
Wanna know how I know you didn't read it?

[Anonymous No.19467288]

>>19467080
His theory of fascism was retroactively refuted by Deleuze and Guattari, whose theory he tries and fails to mobilise in order to understand Freikorps members

Fascism is a kind of war machine that is best understood through Dumezil’s trifunctional argument, not some rehashed Freudian shit that Theweleit thinks it is

The book is an academic failure and just repeats the usual cliches of ”scholarship” on fascism

[Anonymous No.19467293]

>>19467271
Exactly this, how can he explain fascism if he defines fascism as just "sweaty militaristic macho men"
If Norf FC is Fascism, your dad and the guy working as a security officer in the local mall is fascism, than nothing is fascism
The same goes for Adorno and the rest of the Frankfurt fucks that creamed their pants from prostate massages while screaming "Fascism!!!!"

[Anonymous No.19467303]

>>19467080
If you want to get to know someone, do you do so by letting someone who doesn't like them tell you all about why they're a terrible person, or do you meet the person themselves and talk/spend time with them so you can form your own opinion?

[Anonymous No.19467310]

Fascism is like the easiest fucking thing ever to explain. It comes from the desire for control and orderliness. Each time you clean your room you commit micro-fascism. Modern liberalism is a form of fascism too, I know that "libruls are the real fashusts!" is a meme, but it doesn't make it any less true. All people ultimately strive for fascist values, the "antifascists" are just anti classical, inceptional fascism

[Anonymous No.19467320]

>>19467248
>Why haven't you read Industrial Society and its Future, with its perfect explanation of leftism
I have and think Ted is based as fuck. Also please don't assume I'm a virulent anti fascist. Agreeing with a definition/explanation doesn't necessarily have to mean I make the same judgements as the author or the usual readership. This book made me realize that I have quite a fascist bent to my thinking

[Anonymous No.19467327]

>>19467080
>fascism is when incels are afraid of... le empowered women

Does this book ever address the issue of how every single advance in female "empowerment" in the 20th century came at the cost of massive centralization of power and state intrusion into private life aka more fascism?

[Anonymous No.19467329]

Holding in your piss in order to get to a toilet is fascism

[Anonymous No.19467348]

>>19467248
Ted's discussion of leftism is fairly short and found at the beginning of ISAIF. He also criticises conservatives later, and most of the manifesto is not really about his thoughts on left vs right. If you're going to use works you haven't read, maybe try Hayek, Nozick, or Paglia.

[Anonymous No.19467361]

>>19467348
What does that have to do with whether his description is right or not

[Anonymous No.19467371]

>>19467348
Doesn't need to be long if you're not being paid by the word.

[Anonymous No.19467374]

>>19467327
>massive centralization of power and state intrusion into private life
So, socialism?

[Anonymous No.19467381]

Why wouldn't I read the actual founding Fascists to understand Fascism?

[Anonymous No.19467382]

>>19467374
Fascism is socialism

[Anonymous No.19467386]

>>19467327
>>19467374
>state intrusion on private life in abusive manner
>socialism, fascism
We already had a word for this: tyranny. People also seem to use "totalitarianism" in a similar fashion

[Anonymous No.19467404]

>>19467381
because theweleit gained deeper insights, by all means read what the fascists wrote. I'd love to as well but much of it is in Italian and hasn't been translated

[Anonymous No.19467421]

Leftism is when you fantasize about getting assraped by burly bisexual fascist thugs. Leftists have internalized rapeism

[Anonymous No.19467441]

>>19467214
The freikorps weren't fascist. Killing crazy communist catladies does not a fascist make. Read the letters of Ernst von Solomon

[Anonymous No.19467446]

>>19467248
>>19467348
>>19467381

[Anonymous No.19467486]

>>19467441
the movement that was part of the same white terror wave as the italian fascists and set nazi policy for territories to the east had nothing to do with fascism, definitely

[Anonymous No.19467500]

>>19467486
The white terror was royalist. You cant just call everyone who kills commies fascists

[Anonymous No.19467549]

>>19467500
conveniently ignoring the fact that it happened after nearly every monarchy in Europe collapsed and existed in a complete political void

[Anonymous No.19467567]

>>19467486
The same white terror that was a reaction to red terror, like always? The italian fascists and the freikorp were part of "the same white terror"? Fucking how? What the fuck is a nazi policy? I thought nazis didn't have a coherent theory but now they have policies? You guys just define basically anything that gives commies a taste of their own medicine as fascist and expect people to take you seriously.

[Anonymous No.19467579]

>>19467567
Also it's no fucking wonder why normies call communism fascism. According to your own retarded definitions commies are just as much fascists due to their inherent control-freak personalities and short tempers. But no, fascists are like masculine and shit so they are different(lol).

[Anonymous No.19467584]

>>19467080
i mean if the snivelling lgbtsjwtfnpc marxist cattle are going to call you a fascist for the crime of reading old books not wanting children to get molested, or having thoughts unapporved by corporate media, then one cant help but start thinking, can 'fascism' be all that bad?

[Anonymous No.19467586]

>>19467567
>What the fuck is a nazi policy? I thought nazis didn't have a coherent theory but now they have policies?
it was a flux

[Anonymous No.19467589]

>>19467549
It was literally th result of monarchists reacting to the recent overthrow of their monarchy

[Anonymous No.19467596]

>>19467586
>it is whatever I want it to be
Also that picture gives of weird homoerotic vibes. Methinks fascism is at play here

[Anonymous No.19467604]

>>19467327
the end result of feminism is a world were all women are prostitutes. the left just want to replace the family with a managerial state which is more intrusive than 'traditional values' ever were. you need a massive effectively totalitarian bureaucracy of experts, psychiatrists, media elites to ensure people are properly 'liberated' ie. ground down into a monoculture. the real reason leftists oppose traditional values because they get in the way of centralized control and exploitation. in a way its like going back to a pre-modern form of paternalism, before the autonomous bourgeoisie subject, but without any of the benefits of noblese oblige. leftists are like crabs in a bucket, trying to pull down anyone who tries to rise out of nigger status.

[Anonymous No.19467612]

>>19467604
The end result of feminism is state mandated cuckoldry combined with that meme scenario in the Aristophanes play where the hot men have to sleep with all women uglier than the ones they want to get her

[Anonymous No.19467616]

>>19467080
"The success of fascism demonstrates that masses who become fascist suffer more from their internal states of being than from hunger or unemployment. Fascism teaches us that under certain circumstances, human beings imprisoned within themselves, within body armor and social constraints, would rather break out than fill their stomachs; and that their politics may consist in organizing that escape, rather than an economic order that promises future generations full stomachs for life. The Utopia of fascism is an edenic freedom from responsibility. That in itself, I think, is a source of "beauty in the most profound distortion." Meanwhile, communists and the left in general still stubbornly refuse to accept fascism's horrifying proof that the materialism they preach and practice only goes halfway. The desiring-production of the unconscious, as molecular driving force of history, has never entered their materialism—an omission that has had (and still has) tragic consequences."

Based,MARXISTS BTFO
>>19467596
This,so much this

[Anonymous No.19467621]

>>19467589
technically true I guess
>>19467604
beautiful bit of stormfront vomit prose. would fit perfectly in Male Fantasies

[Anonymous No.19467632]

>>19467616
how does that BTFO marxism in any way?

[Anonymous No.19467642]

>>19467616
>tfw you will never be a Confederate soldier impregnating Anne Frank
It's over bros

[Anonymous No.19467645]

>>19467612
the perverse thing about it its that its not being run by regular women(who are far too stupid), but by kike NGOs. its about engineering society, much like the lgbt or transgender movements. These people are not happy sexually liberated rebellious subjects, as the left would have you believe, but mindless, conformists NPCs with beady eyes, who have outsourced their minds to social media propaganda truly a sad thing to see essentially biopolitical clientele for NGOs. so if you are an academic feminist your job is to invent new forms of prostitution and promote the interests of the democratic party. these people are so psyopped that they think a woman who is happily married with children is oppressed but a woman who whores herself out to old dudes and shoots heroin is liberated.

[Anonymous No.19467648]

>>19467621
I mean have you tried bringing up nietszche or any western philosopher for that matter around your local lgbtsjwtfnpc marxist cattle? In no time you will see their beady stupid cowlike eyes light up in panic. Soon enough they will start with the usual subhuman bleating "wasnt he sexist? Arent you being dangerously eurocentric? Hasnt it been debunked as fake news russian bot pseudoscience?Why read books by dead white men when you could have been streaming the latest diverse and inclusive workplace comedies at netflix hulu and disneyplus? your daily mandatory dose of ''ethically sourced'' child pornography? Didnt you know reading antything beyond YA literature is ableist towards people who are too retarded to read? How does this further the short term electoral goals of the democratic party? Are you saying child sex workers arent real sex workers?Have you been taking your daily recomended dose of high fructuouse corn syrup your SSRIs and HRT? it is very important that you take the medication dr goldstein prescribed otherwise we will report you to corporate for mandatory sensitivity training as per the domestic terrorism act of 2021"

[Anonymous No.19467651]

>>19467645
I'm not personally so sure on who or what were the cause(s) of modern feminism. The topic is really very complicated and doesnt make that much sense

[Anonymous No.19467663]

>>19467648
um no. i’ve met plenty of commies that studied kant and greeks and etc

[Anonymous No.19467664]

>>19467651
Either way it's based on the myth that women were somehow "oppressed" throughout history because they didn't own property or something.

[Anonymous No.19467673]

>>19467664
Well they were oppressed in the modern liberal rights sense. The question is just whether unequal rights are bad or good

[Anonymous No.19467702]

>>19467567
>I thought nazis didn't have a coherent theory but now they have policies
not a person on earth denies that the nazis had policies. do you even know what a fucking policy is you retard?

[Anonymous No.19467755]

>>19467702
But now they have policies that are characteristically nazi? So much so that you don't have to be a nazi in order to enact them? The point is that the freikorps weren't fucking nazis you retard

[Anonymous No.19467766]

>>19467755
proto-nazis. also they were a paramilitary faggot

[Anonymous No.19467781]

>>19467616
So what, this guy is basically saying that fascism's appeal is that it caters to immaterial needs that Marxism and liberalism ignore? If he recognizes this why is he still an anti-fascist? This quote just seems to be him admitting that fascism is better than Marxism but uh that's bad for some reason

[Anonymous No.19467849]

>>19467621
>beautiful bit of stormfront vomit prose. would fit perfectly in Male Fantasies
I dare you to prove it wrong though.

[Anonymous No.19467851]

>>19467766
Killing crazy communist cat ladies does not a fascist make.
>paramilitary
A paramilitary does not a fascist make.

[Anonymous No.19467870]

>>19467616
>The success of fascism demonstrates that masses who become fascist suffer more from their internal states of being than from hunger or unemployment.
Is he just going to ignore that German fascism completely eradicated unemployment and poverty, raised wages while simultaneously preserving German heritage and supplying meaning to the German peoples (something neither Marxism nor liberalism were ever able to do)?

[Anonymous No.19467874]

>>19467781
It's pure speculation like all leftist "theory"

[Anonymous No.19467895]

>>19467870
nice fanfic

[Anonymous No.19467903]

>>19467766
>they were a paramilitary faggot
>more trained and better organized than the reds therefore nazis
lol
What's a proto-nazi? Something cavemen do when they beat their mates?

[Anonymous No.19467913]

>>19467870
Yes they absolutely refuse to admit that and then claim the Nazis went to war because their economy somehow required it. It is unreal how dumb the normie take on Nazi economy is

[Anonymous No.19467916]

>>19467870
>>19467913
>How then did Germany “break the bondage of interest”? Few now know. Rearmament is not a sufficient explanation. Prof. A. J. P. Taylor, the eminent British historian, and hardly a Nazi sympathizer, writes:

>"Fascism, it was claimed, represented the last aggressive stage of capitalism in decline, and its momentum could be sustained only by war. There was an element of truth in this, but not much. The full employment which Nazi Germany was the first European country to possess, depended in large part on the production of armaments; but it could have been provided equally well (and was to some extent) by other forms of public works from roads to great buildings. The Nazi secret was not armament production; it was freedom from the then orthodox principles of economics . . . the argument for war did not work even if the Nazi system had relied on armaments production alone. Nazi Germany was not choking in a flood of arms. On the contrary, the German Generals insists unanimously in 1939 that they were not equipped for war and that many years must pass before “rearmament in depth” had been completed."

>Answering predictions of ruin by orthodox economists throughout the world, Hitler explained that Germany had not withdrawn from world trade but had bypassed the international financial system by means of barter, stating:

>"If certain countries combat the German system this is done in the first instance because through the German method of trading their tricks of international currency and Bourse speculations have been abolished in favor of honest business transactions. . . . We are buyers of good foodstuff and raw materials and suppliers of equally good commodities!"

>Taylor comments on German trade barter:

>"Germany was not short of markets. On the contrary, Schacht used bilateral agreements to give Germany practically a monopoly of trade with south-eastern Europe; and similar plans were being prepared for the economic conquest of South America when the outbreak of war interrupted them."

[Anonymous No.19467922]

>>19467916
>Hitler next explained precisely the foundations of the new economic and financial system:

>"If ever need makes humans see clearly it has made the German people do so. Under the compulsion of this need we have learned in the first place to take full account of the most essential capital of a nation, namely, its capacity to work. All thoughts of a gold reserves and foreign exchange fade before the industry and efficiency of well-planned national productive resources. We can smile today at an age when economists were seriously of the opinion that the value of currency was determined by the reserves of gold and foreign exchange lying in the vaults of the national banks and, above all, was guaranteed by them. Instead of that we have learned to realize that the value of a currency lies in a nation’s power of production, that an increasing volume of production sustains a currency, and could possibly raise its value, whereas a decreasing production must, sooner or later, lead to a compulsory devaluation."

>More recently a professional economist, Henry C K Liu[18], who can hardly be suspected of Hitlerism, analyzed the methods by which Germany emerged from the Depression:

>"The Nazis came to power in Germany in 1933, at a time when its economy was in total collapse, with ruinous war-reparation obligations and zero prospects for foreign investment or credit. Yet through an independent monetary policy of sovereign credit and a full-employment public-works program, the Third Reich was able to turn a bankrupt Germany, stripped of overseas colonies it could exploit, into the strongest economy in Europe within four years, even before armament spending began. In fact, German economic recovery preceded and later enabled German rearmament, in contrast to the US economy, where constitutional roadblocks placed by the US Supreme Court on the New Deal delayed economic recovery until US entry to World War II put the US market economy on a war footing. While this observation is not an endorsement for Nazi philosophy, the effectiveness of German economic policy in this period, some of which had been started during the last phase of the Weimar Republic, is undeniable."

[Anonymous No.19467935]

>its a leftist "explains fascism" by projecting everything they dont like instead of actually explaining fascism episode

[Anonymous No.19467944]

>>19467916
>>19467922
interesting. where is that from?

[Anonymous No.19467951]

>>19467935
Leftist conception of fascism is on par with that of a punk with daddy issues.

[Anonymous No.19467954]

>>19467874
Yeah and it seems like his basic definition of fascism is "anyone who opposes communism", which is embarrassing.

[Anonymous No.19467960]

>>19467916
>>19467922
This is good, and it's hilarious that observations this straightforward are considered semi heterodox

[Anonymous No.19467974]

>>19467916
>>19467922
so Hitler was basicaly an early proponent of MMT sans the progressive bullshit?

[Anonymous No.19467988]

>>19467974
Mmt is even more insane than Keynesian economics, in the same direction.

[Anonymous No.19467989]

>>19467916
>>19467922
>bunch of waffling
>no mention of slave labour
man why am i even doing this shit am i really this bored

[Anonymous No.19467992]

>>19467974
>Hitler was the jew all along

[Anonymous No.19468021]

>>19467954
Commies have a very narrow worldview which places anyone who directly opposes them in the fascist thug camp who's protecting the burgeois regime, whether they know it or not. I don't think they believe in intentions or agency. It's all black and white

[Anonymous No.19468037]

>>19467992
I dont think he ever denied it. just that the jews were jewing well while he wanted the germans to jew well rather than be jewed upon.

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » No.19468073]

nothing is more exhaustive than this faggoty endlessly looping psychoanalyzation of fascism, ironically further mystifying pure id in some inane attempt to unlock the esoteric truths of Trve Fascism. just shut the fuck up

fascism in pedestrian discourse has been largely reduced to "thing i dont like," or even better, "when the ruling body exerts power in any meaningful way." and you know what? that's the best way to describe it. fascism is literally when bad people do bad things and any attempt to delve into the illusory intricacies of the system is academic pseud cope. you wasted a hundred grand on tuition for a degree i would blow my nose with. stop it. touch grass.

[Anonymous No.19468121]

>>19468073
>you wasted a hundred grand on tuition for a degree i would blow my nose with. stop it. touch grass.
university is basically free in civilized countries

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » No.19468133]

>>19468121
any truly civilized country wouldn't allow neoliberalism to exist

[Anonymous No.19468144]

>>19468133
>any truly civilized country wouldn't allow neoliberalism to exist
holy based

[Anonymous No.19468146]

>>19468144
holy reddit, more like

[Anonymous No.19468149]

>>19468146
reddit is based sometimes

[Anonymous No.19468153]

>>19468133
correct, but they wouldn't allow marxism or fascism either

[Anonymous No.19468160]

>>19467248
>with its perfect explanation of leftism?
Its really not

[Anonymous No.19468162]

>>19467381
>Why wouldn't I read the actual founding Fascists to understand Fascism?
What fascists say and what fascists do are two very different things.

[Anonymous No.19468174]

>>19468162
Shall we apply this to all groups, learn about communism from people who hate it?

[Anonymous No.19468178]

>>19467248
You're crazy if you think fascism is somehow compatible with the critique laid out by Ted in that book. Do you not know what futurism was?

[Anonymous No.19468190]

>>19467870
>Is he just going to ignore that German fascism completely eradicated unemployment and poverty, raised wages while simultaneously preserving German heritage and supplying meaning to the German peoples (something neither Marxism nor liberalism were ever able to do)?
Lol no

[Anonymous No.19468199]

>>19467080
Why would I want an ideology that's been dead for almost a century "explained" to me?

[Anonymous No.19468223]

>>19468190
Where is that picture from?

[Anonymous No.19468242]

>>19468190
From https://libcom.org/files/Daniel%20Guerin-Fascism%20and%20Big%20Business-Pathfinder%20Press%20(2000).pdf

Now let's have something not cherry picked from commie propaganda.

[Anonymous No.19468249]

>>19468190
>hitler himself had to concede
They were coming out of an awful depression, the situation was improving not becoming worse. Whoever wrote that image was lying through their teeth

[Anonymous No.19468343]

>>19468133
only civilized countries would do that. it's the natural order
>>19468153
neoliberalism is marxism taken to its logical conclusion

[Anonymous No.19468474]

[Anonymous No.19468535]

>>19468190
Nazi Germany had the most spoiling welfare state in human history
Germans on the home front during ww2 had a jolly good time as the government turned all the loot from the war into provisions for your average German
Source: Hitler's Beneficiaries by Götz Aly (as a plus, this book made the rat Tooze throw one of Nazi historiography's greatest hissy fits)
This is different from your typical wehraboo thesis that it was Hitler's brilliant economic policies that saved the Germans from the depression and blablabla which is what the person you're responding to seems to be arguing.
The author Aly actually claims that this welfare state implies guilt for Nazi crimes for modern Germans because many of those items are still in random households around Germany

[Mrcreamy No.19468568]

>>19467135
Psuedo-intellectual words salads made by overeducated and out-of-touch hooligans.

[Anonymous No.19468582]

>>19468535
Yeah except the economy turned around long before they invaded anywhere you faggot

[Anonymous No.19468769]

>>19467135
If this is jargon just wait until you read Zizek

[Anonymous No.19468787]

>>19468121
But should it be considering the garbage it creates?

[Anonymous No.19468837]

>>19467849
I mean its obviously just an excuse to shit on marginalized groups like queer people and sex workers and people of color. Marginalized folks have every reason to trust progressive bourgeoisie over fascist white settlers.we have every right to deplatform fascists and ensure safety for marginalized and vulnerable members of our communities. We have every right to demand decolonization prison abolition family abolition and an end to white supremacy.

[Anonymous No.19468972]

>>19467486
>>19467214
This, book conclusively demonstrates that fascists have a real problem with being scared of pussy. Not hard to conclude from field observations of the average /pol/tard, but it explains everything from the homoeroticism to the dysfunctional personal lives to the extreme loathing and paranoia towards women filtered through a Madonna-whore complex.

[Anonymous No.19468997]

>>19468972
>this books demonstrates that [outgroup] are crazy and pathetic
imagine that

[Anonymous No.19469038]

>>19468972
You dont even nees to do a pretentious jew psychobabble deconstruction of the trannoid marxist psyche because its all there in the open.you dont have to read a whole book to figurtgese "people" are pedophiles and have a victimhood complex

[Anonymous No.19469082]

>>19468997
Go back to Slate Star Codex Scott (((Siskind.)))

[Anonymous No.19469127]

>>19468837
yep this is bait

[Anonymous No.19469450]

>>19467584
>i mean if the snivelling lgbtsjwtfnpc marxist cattle are going to call you a fascist for the crime of reading old books not wanting children to get molested
This doesn’t happen