How come /lit/ never discusses non-fiction works

[Anonymous No.19358024]

[Anonymous No.19358039]

It does despite that sort of thing almost always being outside of the scope of "/lit/erature" in the sense that was intended.
Don't know what this book is exactly, qrd?

[Anonymous No.19358049]

>every second thread about Marx, Schopenhauer or Nietzsche
>guenon shitposters
>cath versus prot bant (inb4 it's fiction)
>history nerds
>occasional language and music threads

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » !!bGBGaUpA8kS No.19358137]

I’ve brought this book up before. No one seems to have read it.
Have you OP? How’s it so far?

[Anonymous No.19358145]

>>19358137
No, but I would like to.

[Anonymous No.19358165]

>>19358137
Is the book any good? I hate pop-sci garbage that needs to make 7 real-life analogies for one scientific thing it tries to explain, those books are mostly filler and are usually filled with the author's opinions disguised as "examining facts".

[Anonymous No.19358513]

>>19358039
Pretty much what the title says: there have been 5 major extinction events in earth's history and the book argues that we're going through a 6th one. Via the subtitle, you can guess what's being blamed (i.e. human activity).

[Anonymous No.19358726]

>>19358024
Not really interested based on the author's info, honestly.

[Anonymous No.19359208]

>>19358145
Then fucking do it. Why are you posting it if you have nothing of value to say about it?

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » !!bGBGaUpA8kS No.19359357]

>>19358165
>>19358726
Here.