[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 366 KB, 699x874, 234DBF46-95C3-4E07-B8C8-674C5CFEBCD3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19330324 No.19330324 [Reply] [Original]

America truly is a joke

>> No.19330344

>>19330324
While I do agree, that photo is clearly photoshopped

>> No.19330350

>>19330344
While I do agree, it doesn’t really matter if it is photoshopped

>> No.19330363

>>19330324
The American Tolkien is Gardner.

>> No.19330364
File: 163 KB, 937x1600, Serape 2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19330364

>>19330324
America's Tolkien is Robert E Howard and he's been dead for almost 100 years and he had stories out before Tolkien
Not surprisingly he thought people were out to get him and was probably autistic
Regardless he gave us
>Conan
>Kull
>Solomon Kane
Among others.
And yes Howard is just as good as Tolkien

>> No.19330826

>>19330364
It's either Howard or Edgar Rice Burroughs.

>> No.19330840

>>19330344
You are autistic and stupid and do not understand the joke

>> No.19330848

>>19330364
Robert E Howard is awesome. An heroed with a .45 after mother died just like a true anon. RIP. Always thought it was odd he was friends wi the Lovecraft.

>> No.19330933

>>19330364
He's wearing those pants way too high, it looks goofy. Geezers can't dress for shit.

>> No.19330972

>>19330848
It's not that odd. Lovecraft enjoyed adventure fiction like Tarzan. Howard enjoyed horror but his horror stories are mostly more action-horror than Lovecraft's. Both of them had themes of distant prehistory. Both of them dabbled in poetry.

>> No.19330985
File: 775 KB, 1011x1362, 1367844735374.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19330985

>>19330324
Tolkien is to creative literary genius what Martin is to hack pulp idiocy. They both so far surpass anyone else in their field that they will be remembered 1,000 years from now as a kind of yin and yang of fantasy, a Manichean duality of speculative letters. For every sublime, luminous beauty that Tolkien has gifted the world, Martin has cursed us with a tedious, banal ugliness. It is unfair to compare the two directly on any one point, because Martin is in every way the anti-Tolkien, patently sterile, parasitical, and inferior, but so much so that he becomes a monument in his own right, and counterbalances Tolkien. Could one exist without the other? Tolkien obviously could. But it is only by the contrast that Martin offers that we can truly appreciate the full depths and heights of Tolkien. Our understanding of Tolkien would be incomplete if Martin had never set pen to page. It is through only the abject failure and futility of Martin that we can approach an apprehension of the true scope and scale of Tolkien's hitherto inconceivable greatness. Perhaps this is what Tolkien had in mind when he wrote about the Music of the Ainur. If Tolkien is a subcreator in the image of Eru, truly Martin is like unto Melkor. It is only reflected in the awfulness of the one that we can fully see the goodness of the other.

>> No.19331004

>>19330344
I think eveyone knows it is: GRRM is almost perfectly spherical

>> No.19332277

>>19330364
Based Howard. Peak Aryan fiction