META THREAD

[Anonymous No.19262406]

Why do mods delete meta threads, even though they have been explicitly permitted by the owner of this site?
Also why do mods never respond to meta threads? I've literally never seen a mod actually respond to the (real) concerns of /lit/izens. That's bad also because it is absolutely clear that many users are confused by certain rules, e.g. why do philosophy threads dedicated to specific philosophy books get pruned all the time, even though the rules explicitly allow for this sort of discussion? People have complained for months, and no one still has an answer to that question. Some transparency would be greatly appreciated.

[Anonymous No.19262417]

Did your ban expire? Remember you won't get away your shitty philosophy spam here faggot.

ur not welcome

[Anonymous No.19262420]

>>19262406
does any of that matter tho?

[Anonymous No.19262430]

>>19262417
I'm not the guy who opened the other meta thread (which should have not been pruned in the first place)
>>19262420
Yes, I'd like /lit/ to be a place were serious discussions csn be had, and I think mods are actively working sbainst this goal.

[Anonymous No.19262436]

>>19262406
>tfw jannies nuked three threads I was involved with in just the past hour
:(

[Anonymous No.19262439]

Slave drivers never let their charges talk amongst themselves.

[Anonymous No.19262452]

>>19262406
god i wish there was a philosophy/esoterica containment board. Hate these retarded shitter faux rhetoricians shitting up the LITERATURE board

[Anonymous No.19262461]

>>19262452
Philosophy is literature. Admins should open a /fiction/ board to contain retards like you who cannot tolerate any mention of non-fiction lit

[Anonymous No.19262469]

>>19262452
sorry to hear that you're filtered

[Anonymous No.19262477]

>>19262436
Stop involving yourself with off-topic threads.

>>19262461
Read the sticky, retard.

[Anonymous No.19262483]

>>19262430
>I'm not the guy who opened the other meta thread (which should have not been pruned in the first place)
I was talking about this one lol

>>>/qa/5229486

[Anonymous No.19262484]

>>>/qa/

[Anonymous No.19262499]

>>19262477
Have you read it? The sticky explicitoy allows for philosophical discussions.
>>19262483
I didnt get banned for that thread, but it made me quit /lit/ for a few days out of disgust.
>>19262484
Meta threads do not belong to /qa/

[Anonymous No.19262503]

>>19262406
jannies = trannies

never forget

[Anonymous No.19262516]

>>19262483
>>19262499
>No one is going to seriously discuss philosophy on /his/, that board has been taken out by /pol/tards (literally just look at the front page and tell me that any serious discussion can be entertained with those mongoloids)
Just because /his/ is shit doesn't mean you get to shit up our board too.

[Anonymous No.19262525]

>>19262406
What's the point of a metathread? Few people will read it. Moreover, no thread has the power to change a board's culture.

[Anonymous No.19262589]

>>19262461
>Admins should open a /fiction/ board to contain retards like you who cannot tolerate any mention of non-fiction lit
Except for the only non-fiction lit you post about is the same philosophers over and over and over again.

[Anonymous No.19262630]

>>19262516
How am I shitting it? I'm not /pol/baiting, I just want to discuss authors Kant and Hegel (whose works count as literature and are allowed by thr sticky) with some fellow /lit/izen.
>>19262525
This thread is on the side kf this board's culture though. People clearly want to discuss philosophy, otherwise there would be no threads about it. Furthermore, this has always been the case (at least in the 10 years I've been here). It's the mods the ones who are going against this board's culture.
>>19262589
And people will keep posting threads about the same classics over and over. There's a reason these authors are discussed so often: it's because their works are worth discussing over and over. Furthermore, these discussions are never repetitive.

[Anonymous No.19262647]

yoooooooooooooooooo
YYYYOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

[Anonymous No.19262671]

>>19262503
jannies are chuds like you

[Anonymous No.19262694]

at this point I think we need to make a separate site because it's obvious the mods don't give a shit about this community

[Anonymous No.19262698]

>come check on /lit/
>see a blatantly off-topic thread that's been up for hours, usually about "marxism" with no mention of specific books at all
>report the thread, get tired at the thought of bothering to look through the rest of the catalog when the lazy cunt mods refuse to do jack shit
>close tab and stay away from 4chan for a few days
>repeat

[Anonymous No.19262720]

>>19262430
but why here lol

[Anonymous No.19262748]

>>19262417
>>19262420
>>19262452
>>19262477
>>19262484
>>19262516
>>19262589
Lol seethe

[Anonymous No.19262755]

>>19262406
>Why do mods delete meta threads
Because it brings up issues of the site's moderation and if the admins get wind of it those poor jannies and mods will be told to fuck off.

>>19262417
Based Bladee poster.

[Anonymous No.19262760]

>>19262755
Also why are the write whats on your mind threads allowed to be up? Its basically just fucking /adv/.

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » !!bGBGaUpA8kS No.19262762]

>>19262406
Here it is, OP >>19257724
Yw

[Anonymous No.19262765]

>>19262720
Why not? It's a small community and there are a few people who actually read and want to discuss. Where else should I go? Reddit? Lmao
I really have some hope for /lit/, mods could foster a community in which a minority brings in some real intellectual value.

[Anonymous No.19262788]

>>19262762
brave showing your face again after pic rel butterfly

[Anonymous No.19262809]

>>19262755
>if the admins get wind of it

[Anonymous No.19262839]

>>19262765
the real world maybe

[Anonymous No.19262873]

>>19262839
I havent found anyone yet for that.

[Anonymous No.19263077]

This thread was moved to >>>/qa/5278512