[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 296 KB, 1642x2560, 81HivNenh7L.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR] No.19215181 [Reply] [Original]

>first page
>you need to have read all of kant to read this
Well I guess I'm never reading this

>> No.19215192

>>19215181
start with the greeks

>> No.19215222

>>19215181
filtered
you have to read kant first for almost anything in modern philosophy

>> No.19215239

>>19215222
not all of him. honestly secondary literature would cover you for anything in schope

>> No.19215246

>>19215239
yes, you can bridge almost any gap with secondary literature but that does not change that for most modern philosophy knowing your basic kant is expected

>> No.19215254

>>19215246
aww, but if you've already read him can't you just explain it to me

>> No.19215255

>>19215222
Is there any way to make him more bearable? I do not want to read hundreds of pages of this man's bullshit systemizations of thinking if it's not going to be worth it

>> No.19215262

>>19215181
You haven't read Kant yet?

>> No.19215266

>>19215255
read an introductory work about him then and maybe some lectures but if you want to be serious about your study of philosophy there is no way around reading at least the "critique of pure reason"

>> No.19215334

>>19215266
What do you need to read before Kant then?

Not him

>> No.19215345

>>19215334
obviously you could go with the whole start with the greeks meme but if you want to read mostly modern kontinental phil. then kant is the perfect foundation to start

>> No.19215368

>>19215262
No. Ayn Rand said he was a baby dicked fag and her clit was bigger.

>> No.19215380

>>19215334
>>19215345
Just read a fucking tertiary philosophy 101 text then break into whomever actually resonates with you.

>> No.19216182

>>19215181
>wow Schopenhauer's metaphysics is soo cool and interesting
>have to wade through hundreds of pages of cringe unphilosophical sadboy anecdotes
I didn't have to do this for Kant, or any other real philosopher.

I don't remember Buddha doing this shit either, so don't act like his philosophy is dependant on this extremely subjective writing style.

>> No.19216308

>>19215181
why would you not want to read kant though? he's 1000x times better than shchopenhauer

>> No.19216321

>>19215334
have a decent understanding of aristotelian logic, read descartes discourse on method and meditations on first philosophy, and then the prolegomena to any future metaphysics. those are what have helped me. I don't think you need to read the empricists, just know what they basically believed which is not complicated and know what the problem of induction is.

>> No.19216323

Read the prologemena to future metaphysics and find a syllabus for critique of pure reason so you can read the important parts.

>> No.19216345

>>19215181
I bet you haven't even read Duproix or Hent, have you nigger?

Oh you have? Yeah?

I just made those names up, faggot.

You are such a piece of fucking trash, dude. You have no idea, lol.

>> No.19216759

>>19215181
>to read Kant u need to read 40 greek books too bro

>> No.19218225

>>19216321
you dont need any of this

>> No.19218231

>>19218225
I originally tried reading the CPR without any of it and I understood a lot less than I thought I did.