Based Bookstack Thread

[Anonymous No.19200528]

Post based Bookstacks.

[Anonymous No.19200571]

Extremely based remove Zizek though

[v_v !!+e0M0fBMYzt No.19200579]

[Anonymous No.19200636]

>>19200528
Can't be based if it has Richard Nixon talking about a war he helped drag on to win his presidency

[Anonymous No.19200643]

>>19200636
Sounds based

[Anonymous No.19200650]

>>19200643
Treason sure is based

[Anonymous No.19200652]

>>19200650
Agreed

[Anonymous No.19200677]

>>19200528

[Anonymous No.19200705]

>>19200636
>Describes incredibly based action
>Can't be based
Pic related

[Anonymous No.19200708]

>>19200677
Anon what the fuck

[Anonymous No.19200711]

>>19200705
>dragging out a meaningless war for capital hill favoritism
>based

[Anonymous No.19200723]

>>19200711
It's only not based if this is the type of world you want. For the rest of us it's based

[Anonymous No.19200726]

[Anonymous No.19200734]

>>19200723
It's only considered based if you've literally never read a book about the Vietnam War or the backstory of the French Indochina War, get more prospective of history outside of the Cold War and le democrats vs republicans

[Anonymous No.19200737]

>>19200734
I understand you're 15 and you just learned about Chomsky but once you get older you will read more about foreign policy and realize it's not all le bad America

[Anonymous No.19200738]

>>19200528
That stack is reddit and cringe.

[Anonymous No.19200748]

Pseud chad reporting in

[Anonymous No.19200750]

>>19200748
Do you live in the third world

[Anonymous No.19200759]

>>19200737
Didn't even say that, I'm saying that interfering with peace talks that Hubert Humphrey set up to get a leg up on the polls and led to 20k more American deaths isn't based. But I'm talking to a brainlet that knows nothing about American history anyway so what does it matter.

[Anonymous No.19200765]

>>19200750
usa so fourth world

[Anonymous No.19200772]

>>19200765
Why is your camera so bad? Do you not have lights?

[Anonymous No.19200783]

>>19200759
>nooo not the American lives!!!

[Anonymous No.19200788]

>>19200677
Nice. The journalism bits from France and England are nice to have as well, anon. Did you read the brown Edel abridgement before picking up the complete?

[Anonymous No.19200793]

>>19200783
So that's your rebuttal? Green-text about a subject you know nothing about? Unironically educate yourself about the backstory of Vietnam and the Vietnam War itself, it's actually interesting.

[Anonymous No.19200797]

>>19200772
Old phone, bad lighting, volumes yellowed with time, an all but tangible astral shameglaze invisibly dominating everything.

[Anonymous No.19200800]

>>19200793
I know more than you can imagine. Did you expect Nixon to just let the other guy win? Also Peace in Vietnam? Who wants that shit?

[Anonymous No.19200810]

>>19200793
Dif anon. My pop fought in that and has the most hateful memories; that he was as young as the youngest youngfags here when all that went down just blows my mind
Dif anon, of course

[Anonymous No.19200814]

>>19200800
I doubt you know that much if you think the retarded puppet government in South Vietnam was good. The domino effect didn't amount to much based on Laos and Cambodia looking at history through a Cold War Lens perspective.

[Anonymous No.19200817]

>>19200814
>The domino effect didn't amount to much
Yeah it didn't thanks to us being secretly involved in every country. In your ideal world where the US wasn't involved anywhere and we let everyone be free we would be living under Communism

[Anonymous No.19200821]

>>19200748
Based

[Anonymous No.19200834]

>>19200817
So you can look at modern society and willingly say that we're well off by sacrificing 50k+ lives to a war that had no meaning other than "beating communists"? I don't even support communist political bearings, but this sounds like some retarded ideological McCarthy idealism.

[Anonymous No.19200843]

>>19200834
The 60 million killed under Communism is nothing compared to the US deaths huh

[Anonymous No.19200847]

>>19200843
No shit, I already said I'm not an advocate of communism, They went through their own retarded war with Afghanistan like Vietnam in the 80s.

[Anonymous No.19200854]

>>19200847
So what did you want the US to do? Would you be fine with just using a Nuke and saving US lives?

[Anonymous No.19200865]

>>19200528
>DC Schindler
Extraordinarily based

[Anonymous No.19200869]

>>19200854
Letting Ho Chi Min win like it was apparent then destabilization of their government from the inside to show that communism doesn't work on a large scale would've been the most straightforward route instead of fighting an 11 year war that every president since JFK said was unwinnable.

[Anonymous No.19200870]

>>19200528

[Anonymous No.19200958]

>>19200869
>Bro just let the Communists trust me we win if they win

[Anonymous No.19200977]

Schizo nigger reporting in

[Anonymous No.19201088]

>>19200958
You're still looking at war through a childish viewpoint in winning or losing like collegian football. Expand your knowledge on the topic.

[Anonymous No.19201095]

>>19201088
Notice how you haven't provided any real information. You just keep saying "look it up" I feel like you don't have any knowledge.

[Anonymous No.19201104]

>>19201095
Because "look it up" is a common rebuttal to someone that just says that Nixon is based without previous historical knowledge since they just rely on current political trends without seeing how they were in the 60s and 70s.

If you actually want substance to your argument look up a million documentaries like Ken Burns or Reporting Vietnam.

[Anonymous No.19201180]

>>19200677
Do you jak' it thinking of Henry?

[Anonymous No.19201182]

>>19200870
based

[Anonymous No.19201192]

>>19200870
The only thing thatvworths something there is leather.

[Anonymous No.19201300]

>>19201104
>Ken Burns
This doc was Refuted by academic consensus. Already proved you know nothing.

[Anonymous No.19201312]

>>19200677
keep going anon.

[Anonymous No.19201413]

>>19200528
Based Conservative reading list. Remove Zizek though. He’a no Diogenes.

[Anonymous No.19201415]

>>19200677
Based Henry James reader.

[Anonymous No.19201428]

>>19200528
Read any yet? Hows the Deficit Myth?

[Anonymous No.19201470]

>engel
>zizkek
>based

[Anonymous No.19201491]

The Golden Asse - Apuleius
Orestian Trilogy - Aeschylus
I Numeri Sacri - A. Reghini
Culture of Critique - K. Macdonald
La Roi du Monde - R. Guenon
Symbols of Sacred Science - R. Guenon
Tradizone ermetica - J. Evola
Morals - Plutarch

[Anonymous No.19201524]

>>19200677
Does anyone have a Henry James reading chart? I’m kind of interested in his work. I would also like one for William J as well.

[Anonymous No.19201580]

I've got kino here.

[Anonymous No.19201586]

>>19200528
>Cass Sunstein and Vermeule
Have you listened to nothing Bap has said?

>>19200677
are you ok?

>>19200748
Based but get better lighting, hard myron the Godwin

>>19200870
Christpilled but a bit boring

>>19200977
Esoteric Hitlerism is the strangest thing to me

[Anonymous No.19201895]

>>19200579
What a hideous cover
>>19200748
>Arktos by Godwin
excellent
>>19200977
Where did you get those Devi books? I've only found Lightning & Sun
>>19201586
>Esoteric Hitlerism is the strangest thing to me
Why?

[Anonymous No.19202679]

>>19200677
Damn I wish I could be autistic about a writer like that

[Anonymous No.19202768]

>>19201895
Other Devi books are from counter-currents.com

[Anonymous No.19202896]

>>19200977
Based. Check out her book on Akhnaten too.

[Anonymous No.19203457]

>>19201524
If you're not comfortable and well acquainted with James' style (specifically his later work) I suggest reading him in stages to ease yourself into it.

Stage one
>The American
>Washington Square
>The Portrait of a Lady
>Roderick Hudson
>The Europeans
>Confidence
>Watch and Ward

Stage two
>The Bostonians
>The Princess Casamassima
>What Maisie Knew
>The Tragic Muse
>The Spoils of Poynton
>The Awkward Age

Stage three (final boss)
>The Wings of the Dove
>The Ambassadors
>The Golden Bowl
>The Sacred Fount
>The Outcry

Stage 4 (read if you have a deep appreciation for James)
>Travel Writings
>Notebooks
>Letters
>Autobiographies
>Essays and Criticism

Essential short stories
>Travelling Companions
>Madame de Mauves
>Four Meetings
>Daisy Miller
>Georgina's Reasons
>An International Episode
>The Author of Beltraffio
>The Aspern Papers
>The Lesson of the Master
>The Pupil
>The Private Life
>The Real Thing
>Owen Wingrave
>The Middle Years
>The Death of the Lion
>The Next Time
>The Figure in the Carpet
>The Turn of the Screw
>In the Cage
>The Altar of the Dead
>The Real Right Thing
>The Abasement of the Northmores
>The Beast in the Jungle
>Fordham Castle
>Julia Bride
>The Jolly Corner
>A Round of Visits

This is the Henry James Experience. Daisy Miller, Washington Square and Portrait of a Lady are all good entry points. Good luck and have fun! He truly is one of the greatest.

[Anonymous No.19203745]

>>19201586
>BAP

I do not listen to homosexuals rping as the Nietzschean Ubermensch online.

[Anonymous No.19203779]

>>19200869
>destabilization of their government from the inside to show that communism doesn't work on a large scale
are you saying the US should actively sabotage a government to show that the government doesn't work

[Anonymous No.19204803]

>>19201586
no you're boring

[Anonymous No.19204874]

>>19200528
New stack, what do you think?

[Anonymous No.19204883]

>>19203457
Nice, but I think The Art of Fiction's a tier two desideratum; why do you withhold all essay reading till the end? Just curious

[Anonymous No.19204897]

>>19200528

[Anonymous No.19205530]

>>19200579
What is the best place to start if I want to learn what Stirner meant by "spook"?

[Anonymous No.19205547]

>>19200528
Thoughts on Violence?

[Anonymous No.19205550]

>>19200677
I kneel...

[Anonymous No.19205559]

[Anonymous No.19205679]

>>19200571
>remove Zizek though
why? only a retarded faggot would do that