[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 23 KB, 200x310, bmph.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19145668 No.19145668 [Reply] [Original]

Art is objective

>> No.19145675

This post is art.

>> No.19145677

And what does this objective criteria look like

>> No.19145721

>>19145675
No, it's shite

>> No.19146778
File: 36 KB, 1280x720, 38E8935A-D7FB-46F0-BA9C-B53455D5ABDA.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19146778

>>19145668

>> No.19146826
File: 69 KB, 960x720, slide_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19146826

In the sense that beauty is objective and "art" should only be used to refer to works created in the earnest, uncynical pursuit of beauty? I agree.

>> No.19147341

>>19145668
define art

>> No.19147451

Post an objectively good art.

>> No.19147478

>>19145668
I'm very sorry, but it isn't. Art is a reaction to the time in which it was made, and therefore in constant flux*

*ignoring, of course, the fact that "art" is just a circle jerk, and the monetary value of "art" is completely arbitrary.

>> No.19147479

>>19147341
anything that I like

>> No.19147482

>>19147479
what if you have shit taste?

>> No.19147494

>>19146826
>devilish hubbub
sounds like a funky good time to me

>> No.19147535

>>19145668
to god yes, to humans, impossible

>> No.19147538
File: 34 KB, 640x513, 1576384018030.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19147538

>>19145668
OP is beautiful inside and out. That is what makes him a piece of art.

>> No.19147944

>>19147538
You made me blush anon
>>19147478
Read the book, this is what art is today but that's not what it was like before

>> No.19148678

>>19145675
Derivative copy of the original, pure imitation, artistically worthless.

>> No.19148692

>>19145668
2016 called, they want your culture war back

>> No.19149299

>>19145668
Book is twitter garbage

>> No.19149305

>>19145668
>Western art
As in... there's other art?

>> No.19149311
File: 143 KB, 713x1024, 1625253613776.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19149311

>>19145668
trad art is objective-ly bad

>> No.19149318

>>19145668
pop-right wing defense of aesthetics
>uuuugh so these random 19th century writers agree with me
>has no built works besides ametuer attempts at romantic revivalism
>piggybacks on other groups works often misinterprets meta or ironic work as aligning with their own
>>>>>>burkeans
post-post modernist defense of aesthetics
>articulated linguistic, rationalist and structuralist analysis
>dozens of built works
>invasive persistence in comteporary art
>Aristotelians

>> No.19149368

>>19149305
There's not but it's polite to pretend.