/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.19094929]

I just lost another internet argument on /lit/

[Anonymous No.19094939]

>>19094929
Just retroactively refute them

[Anonymous No.19094942]

Did you resort to soijaks?

[Anonymous No.19094959]

>>19094942
Maybe

[Anonymous No.19094975]

>>19094942
>Did you resort to soijaks?

[Anonymous No.19094985]

>>19094929
Did you hide the thread?

[Anonymous No.19094998]

>>19094929
Are you from a Nietzsche thread or a Jesus thread?

[Anonymous No.19095039]

Ive never lost an argument on lit
I propose that all synthesis in human affairs is predicated on a foundation of physical violence.

[Anonymous No.19095058]

>>19094985
Yes
>>19094998
I’ll never tell

[Anonymous No.19095064]

>>19095039
So you're a brainlet who can't grasp Hobbes.

[Anonymous No.19095072]

>>19095064
hobbes was btfoed by modern anthropology

[Anonymous No.19095073]

>>19094929
I have never lost an argument on 4chan :)

[Anonymous No.19095077]

>>19094929
I sense nabocope

[Anonymous No.19095098]

>>19095072
"Modern anthropology" is a pozzed pile of shit ridden with self-contradicting commies. Actual research on primate sociality confirm everything he said.

[Anonymous No.19095127]

>>19095098
nah, archeology also confirms the existence of pre-state egalitarian societies, excavated settlements without class differentiation, etc

[Anonymous No.19095139]

Don't worry about it. Just watch The Turin Horse at booksandliteraturechat.com

[Anonymous No.19095149]

>>19094929
You should always presuppose yourself, like Hegel does, I guess you should read Hegel.

[Anonymous No.19095165]

>>19095127
Absolute, colossal, unimaginable cope

[Anonymous No.19095170]

>begin losing 4chinz argument
>stop replying and wait for thread to get to page 11
>post my rebuttal, call them a retard, and sage the thread

[Anonymous No.19095204]

>>19095098
dear god, you are retarded.

[Anonymous No.19095206]

>>19095170
So nobody reads your argument? What then is the point of posting it?

[Anonymous No.19095207]

>>19095170
Meh that's weak. When I start to lose I reply to my own comments with dumb objections and afterwards only reply to those strawman arguments

[Anonymous No.19095210]

>>19095098
>we need to hand over our lives to modern states or everyone is just constantly killing and dysfunction
no. the concept is untenable given millions of years.

[Anonymous No.19095282]

>>19095127
>>19095204
>>19095210
Just hurry up and post your cope soijacks and then make a thread crying about it, I've got things to do tonight. Also, dilate.

[Anonymous No.19095299]

>>19095098
>>19095127
>>19095072
>>19095064
Hobbes was 70% right, just like Mao.

[Anonymous No.19095315]

>>19095170
Why sage? Then the opponent might never see themselves getting btfo

[Anonymous No.19095363]

Preserve your honor and commit seppuku.

[Anonymous No.19095397]

>>19095299
>Curates egg

[Anonymous No.19095427]

>>19095282
>AFTER YOU HAVE CLEANED YOUR ROOM, AND CONQUERED THE PROBLEM OF SELF-CONSCIOUSSNESS, WHICH IS TO SAY, CLEANED YOUR SOUL, THEN YOU ARE READY TO DIALOUGE WITH THE INTERNET MARXISTS. BUT YOU HAVE TO APPROACH THE TOPIC WITH A BIT OF TREPEDIATION, LIKE YOU ARE CLIMBING ONTO A WILD PONY. YOU SEE, THE GREATEST INSIGHT OF ALEXANDER SOLZHENITSYN IS HIS UNDERSTANDING OF THE NEO-MARXIST PSYCHOSPHERE. WHAT THE MARXIST IS MOST AFRAID OF, AND THIS IS UNDENIABLE, IS THE HYPER-MASCULINE FATHER-WARRIOR TROPE. IT TERRIFIES THEM. SO YOU GO OUT, AND YOU THREATEN THEM THROUGH THE KEYBOARD. YOU MAKE THEM BLOODY KNOW THAT YOU ARE A BIG GUY. AND DO NOT LIKE THEM AT ALL. AND THAT THEY ARE THE SUBJECT OF YOUR VIOLENT FANTASIES. THAT IS KEY. BUT HERE IS THE TWIST. THE CONUNDRUM. YOU NEED TO TELL THEM THAT THEY ARE A MAN TOO. THAT THEY EMBODY THE WARRIOR-TROPE. MOST OF ALL YOU WANT TO TELL THEM THAT THEY ARE NOT A WOMAN. ITS ALL RIGHT THERE IN THE GULAG ARCHIPELAGO.

[Anonymous No.19095442]

>>19095165
This is what it looks like to lose an argument on /lit/. Everyone get a good look.

[Anonymous No.19095552]

>>19094929
>losing argument
>say 'have sex incel' and bail
works for me

[Anonymous No.19095580]

>>19095315
What? They probably will, when they come back to the thread it'll be archived and they'll see your post but won't be able to reply

[Anonymous No.19095592]

>lose the argument
>learn something new

[Sage No.19095611]

Sage
Test

[Anonymous No.19095642]

I've never lost an argument on /lit/ or /sci/ or anywhere else on 4chan for that matter...anywhere else that is...except for /pol/ (to be fair, I was baiting but for some reason being one upped by one of those retards—even if in context I was pretending to be a philosemitic anarchist tranny—still hurt a lot. I honestly don't know why).

[Anonymous No.19095663]

>>19095580
>but won't be able to reply
But I want them to reply so I can btfo them again. I do it all the time.
>Have one tab with a book pdf open, one with a 4chan thread
>Refute a moronic leftist post, go back to reading
>Leftist comes back with some braindead reply
>5 minutes later I get a notification
>Switch from reading to thread, btfo the leftist again, go back to reading
>Rinse and repeat
There is no pleasure in getting the last word because the thread archived. The real pleasure is in them going quiet because they have accepted they are wrong. This fails with /pol/types though because they will just soijak you again and again. In that case I am forced to concede the thread. (Strangely, leftists who soijak can be defeated easily, but right-wingers can keep doing it for dozens of replies).

[Anonymous No.19095670]

I get into arguments using positions I know are wrong so that I can make someone expend the maximum effort possible explaining why all my sophistry is nonsense.

[Anonymous No.19095701]

>>19095592
>>19095670
These are the right approaches.

[Anonymous No.19095707]

>>19094939
Based parmenidean.

[Anonymous No.19095712]

>>19095670
The tranny fears the soijak

[Anonymous No.19096016]

>>19094929
just post your opinion and leave the thread

[Anonymous No.19096026]

>just won another /lit/ argument

[Anonymous No.19096049]

I am genius level IQ so I never lose arguments. Sometimes the opponent is too dumb to engage with, or worse, a pseud who thinks he is smart, and so I just leave the thread, because I get angry at the arrogance of stupidity. That happens at the point where to make progress on the argument I have to internalize their dumbness and refute it in a way they'd understand, which only taints my mind with lower thinking.

[Anonymous No.19096063]

>>19094929
I pretend to be an inept version of my opposing position on /lit/ so that entry level lamers can "destroy" "my position" in public.

[Anonymous No.19096068]

>guy replies to me
>he missed the point of my argument completely
>not sure if he's retarded or just trying to strawman me

[Anonymous No.19096081]

>reply to yourself
>I agree with this anon

[Anonymous No.19096088]

>>19096081
Agreed

[Anonymous No.19096492]

>>19095073
>I have never lost an argument on 4chan :)
You have now.

[Anonymous No.19096512]

>>19096081
>>19096088
Kek

[Anonymous No.19096516]

>>19094975
>>>19094942
>>Did you resort to soijaks?

[Anonymous No.19097298]

>>19096516
Is this Chad Bathcat?

[Anonymous No.19097300]

you must read harder

[Anonymous No.19097353]

I don't waste my time. If you can't grasp my point in my first post, you're retarded, either ironically for attention-seeking or unironically.
Pseuds think they've "won the debate" after replying with a buzzwordy catchphrase or total misrepresentation of my argument and I'll just let them live their lives and then die as morons. None of you deserve my dissertations.

[Anonymous No.19097383]

>>19095592
this

[Anonymous No.19097387]

>>19097353
>dissertations
please consider suicide.

[Anonymous No.19097389]

>>19097387
I'll think about it

[Anonymous No.19097436]

>>19097387
>>19097389
Finally, a cordial exchange on /lit/; you have made a tired black man who's just had a bad day a bit happier.

[Anonymous No.19097513]

>>19097436
This is why I make a point to never have cordial exchanges on /lit/

[Anonymous No.19097933]

You are anonymous, so no one will remember. Now only you need to stop caring.

[Anonymous No.19097952]

Who decides when you've lost an argument on 4chan?

[Anonymous No.19097977]

>>19097952
In order of importance.

1.Whoever gets tired and stops posting first loses.
2.Whoever's soijak is the least psychotic loses.
3.Whoever gets hit with a Sneed first loses.

[Anonymous No.19097986]

>>19097977
Sneed
By the rules of 4chan discussion I have made all you were trying to convey obsolete

[Anonymous No.19097990]

>>19094942
Use this one next time
It's my favorite

[Anonymous No.19098001]

>>19094929
I stopped arguing. I can't handle it anymore. trolling whatever you call it; I just post my honest opinions now and I've found that's the ultimate method of trolling.
I just like to be helpful now.

I've been coming to 4chan since 2007 and my skin is just too soft now.

I can't handle the banter anymore. I just. I don't even know why I come here anymore. Maybe I should go to reddit but I hate how they coddle everyone.

[Anonymous No.19098020]

>>19098001
Reddit you can have an actual conversation, but only on a limited range of topics. Anything that "crosses the line" gets you banned.
4chan you can talk about anything, but only in the stupidest least productive way possible.

Both suck. I want to go live in the desert or something desu.

[Anonymous No.19098023]

If you only start soijacking after a few back and forths everyone will know you're coping. You should soijak from the very start.

[Anonymous No.19098033]

>Use this one next time
>It's my favorite
>If you only start soijacking after a few back and forths everyone will know you're coping. You should soijak from the very start.

[Anonymous No.19098039]

>>19098023
Start strong, end strong.

[Anonymous No.19098057]

it's not just the soijak that matters but the succinct, bad faith green text rendering of your opponent's argument that accompanies it

[Anonymous No.19098071]

>it's not just the soijak that matters but the succinct, bad faith green text rendering of your opponent's argument that accompanies it

[Anonymous No.19098134]

>>19098071
>you have to use le heckin quote arrow for your basedjak to work