Based Chink BTFO'd Christianity 400 years ago

File: 144 KB, 600x896, download.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

Based Chink BTFO'd Christianity 400 years ago Anonymous Tue Sep 21 04:52:22 2021 No.19089924 [Reply] [Original]

>Similar expressions can also be found in the early Qing work Bude yi 不得已 (I Cannot
Do Otherwise, 1665) by Yang Guangxian. With the fast growth of Catholic communities in
the earlier decades, Yang and his followers could learn more relevant information about the
Christian religion. They refuted all major Catholic doctrines, including those about Mary. In
his work, Yang develops a critical view on Mary’s virgin birth of Jesus,

>If the Lord of Heaven is Jesus, who holds him and puts him in Mary’s womb? Even
among the strange stories in Qixie 齊諧, one can hardly find any nonsense like this. The
male-female sexual intercourse is the way all things are born, and it is also the general
principle in the human world. If the son has both a father and a mother, he will not feel
ashamed. But if there is only a mother but no father, the son will lose his dignity. … For
a man with a mother but no father, I am afraid that he cannot even teach people in his
own country. How can his fatherlessness be known to all nations under heaven! Only the
beasts know a mother than a father in the world, is it true that believers of the [Christian]
religion do not know their fathers? Otherwise, why would they worship this fatherless
ghost and respect him so much? The way they regard a fatherless son as a sage indeed
opens the opportunity for those women who do not have a husband.

>If Mary gave birth to Jesus, one cannot say that she has kept a virgin body. How come a
virgin girl would delightfully accept the [serious] matter of pregnancy? Moreover, who
could verify whether she kept a virgin body or not? In the Book of Rites, it is said that
“words of the inner chamber shall not be passed out,” and, “there should be no talking
about women at the courtyard in front of the ancestral hall.” These [statements] are to
exhort a sense of shame. Even the beasts would not speak of the virgin body of a mother,
how come this so-called sage would speak of it, and his disciples would announce it to
all nations under heaven? The disciples of Jesus were therefore worse than the beasts!
The two words “virgin body” must have been used as an excuse for fatherlessness. What
they do not know is that whoever excuses himself accuses himself!

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]

/lit/ - Literature