[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 452 KB, 960x664, 1629043597095.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19058055 No.19058055[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

/lit/ humor thread?
Let's have some funnies. Dumping mine.

>> No.19058056
File: 64 KB, 750x606, 1630479442733.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19058056

>> No.19058059
File: 329 KB, 3464x1284, PM virgin vs chad.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19058059

>> No.19058065
File: 282 KB, 1032x1480, 1631296916147.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19058065

>> No.19058075
File: 679 KB, 1054x921, 1615712896908.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19058075

>> No.19058078
File: 3.86 MB, 1276x3200, The_Tumult_of_the_Niggers.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19058078

>> No.19058081
File: 91 KB, 680x678, E3053D99-AF70-4ACD-A1F1-F0019C0FC150.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19058081

>> No.19058085
File: 70 KB, 680x537, 1629360166707.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19058085

>> No.19058088
File: 2.12 MB, 1908x5250, 1605499213842.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19058088

>> No.19058092
File: 255 KB, 1020x609, 1628043415702.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19058092

>> No.19058097
File: 70 KB, 767x773, 9ed1jd1uzn071.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19058097

>> No.19058101
File: 69 KB, 700x875, 1615885087705.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19058101

>> No.19058176
File: 734 KB, 1246x1519, fitthread2 copy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19058176

>>19058055
>When /fit/ tried to become /lit/
https://youtu.be/ZJRPRVu31S4

>> No.19058208
File: 198 KB, 321x397, DD8A1B89-799A-42E9-A021-E29900A0435D.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19058208

>> No.19058614
File: 40 KB, 605x800, 139.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19058614

>> No.19058817
File: 188 KB, 737x1029, B44F391B-7802-4BD9-A132-C4EDE0ACA7FB.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19058817

>> No.19058855

>>19058208
I love Gardner memes

>> No.19058858
File: 16 KB, 319x319, 1630757092866.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19058858

I was lead to believe there would be humour.

>> No.19059138
File: 961 KB, 2080x2652, conflict in literature.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19059138

>>19058858
Disappointing, isn't it?

>> No.19059332
File: 463 KB, 1380x1228, fatal.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19059332

>> No.19059377

>>19058088
Clark, is that you?

>> No.19059394 [SPOILER] 
File: 592 KB, 992x561, 1631777277795.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19059394

>>19058855

>> No.19059654

>>19058614
me

>> No.19059680
File: 26 KB, 203x299, F318FD77-E32F-4B17-A92E-06D599B9032D.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19059680

>> No.19059704
File: 80 KB, 640x782, 1629835811496.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19059704

I think I asked this in the last thread but got no response, although I've seen the image so I know someone has it.
It was a 4chan post about how most normal people don't need to self improve, and the people that have to self-improve to do something are pathetic. That got posted on twitter and had a stupid response that referenced Heidegger or Wittgenstein or someone like that, and mentioned a concept about tools. A screenshot of the twitter post was posted to /lit/ around 4-5 months ago, and some anon made a very funny and long response in the thread replies, and then someone screenshotted that.
Does anybody have that image?

>> No.19059771
File: 340 KB, 768x768, IMG2928999284298007861.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19059771

>> No.19059775
File: 39 KB, 800x600, 248bM-svyad5oh4aG5NQogR2KV8ZCHsBdH7IgItEoz4.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19059775

>> No.19059777
File: 303 KB, 750x724, image0-6.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19059777

>> No.19059833
File: 170 KB, 504x360, a2b0a.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19059833

>> No.19059839
File: 83 KB, 780x960, FB1B1FCA-5688-4D7F-A029-A218A6B1D7DA.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19059839

>> No.19059950
File: 1.49 MB, 1724x1373, 1627293819898.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19059950

>>19059704

>> No.19059988

>>19059950
thank you very much anon

>> No.19059999

>>19059777
>)
first actual laugh

>> No.19060001

>>19059950
Based

>> No.19060009

>>19059775
haha:)

>> No.19060010

>>19059950
Can it go deeper?

>> No.19060191
File: 34 KB, 200x128, pepe-smoking-cigar-drinking-scotch-thumbnail.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19060191

>>19059988

>> No.19060256

>>19059950
The response isn't much better. Firstly, as you know, Heidegger's fundamental analysis of Dasein as Being-in-the-World has a tripartite structure: World (Welt), Self (Selbst) and Being-in (In-Sein). The distinction between zuhanden/vorhanden simply isn't relevant when it comes to social relations, it's a subset of the analysis of the Weltlichkeit-der-Welt and not of Mitsein (which would be the relevant category in the given example). Secondly, Heidegger isn't trying to make a "point about authenticity" and he isn't "critiquing das Man." Being and Time isn't an ethics, it purports to be a work of fundamental ontology. He's not making the value judgement that authenticity is good and that inauthenticity is bad, he's merely pointing out two possibilities of the Self as Being-with.

>> No.19060311
File: 43 KB, 540x327, 1630175092728.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19060311

>>19058097

>> No.19060315

>>19060256
Based Heidegger understander.

>> No.19060325
File: 40 KB, 500x673, 1614114729093.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19060325

>> No.19060359

>>19058817
what's the vid? is it some nasheed compilation?

>> No.19060361

>>19060256
Wasn't he pointing towards authenticity which the reader don't read in his words but by experiencing it for himself which truly make him realize about him being in the world?

>> No.19060379

>>19060361
No and it sounds like you’re confusing Heidegger with a murky idea of Wittgenstein

>> No.19060426

>>19060379
What is the function of existential anguish? Don't you think that in Heidegger we can find the continuation of Wittgenstein's philosophy?

Don't you think that Easterners have this go with the flow philosophy and westerner have this go against the flow kind of Philosophy?

>> No.19060630

>>19060361
I don't know what you mean. It's a technical term, the German word is Eigentlichkeit (one of Heidegger's neologisms), and authenticity isn't an optimal translation. It's kind of a pun implying both eigentlich and eigen. But yes, authenticity is relevant for his project in that it opens up for anxiety and being-towards-death, and then ultimately for understanding Dasein as Care (Sorge).

>> No.19060674

>>19059777
kek

>> No.19060765

>>19059999
>>19059777
quads replying to trips, pretty cool

>> No.19060840

Please someone post the screencap of that sublime account about the anon with an aristocratic attitude went to Barnes & Noble and pretentiously spoke to the clerk in spanish because "that was the language of her ancestors" or something like that and left and went to wendy's/papa john's in his momma's car like a madman that shit is gold

>> No.19060969

>>19059839
>Better known for other work
kek

>> No.19060986

>>19058056
I don't get it.

>> No.19060991

>>19058088
Imagine humanity vanishes and all that is left from written language is this

>> No.19061007

>>19058088
Tolkien meets Sade and the conversation is written down by a liberal.

>> No.19061092

>>19058075
bond burgered?

>> No.19061118

>>19059704
nice, i always vaguely wondered how karma was calculated. so one upboat is one point, and one downboat is -1? can i get negative karma? is there a limit before i get banned?

>> No.19061279
File: 76 KB, 1011x1005, received_1451806025152887.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19061279

>>19058097

>> No.19061288
File: 78 KB, 1009x1010, received_3765398646920405.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19061288

>>19061279

>> No.19061307

>>19058059
John David, buddy, no one cares about your mediocre book or your mediocre personality. No one cares how hard you worked on it, because that isn't how life works. Contrary to what you were told in kindergarten, trying hard doesn't matter. Results matter. And the first few pages of People Mover was filled with hollow description and painfully contrived dialogue, with a premise ripped straight from a teenager's daydreams or some 20-something single mom's "wanderlust" photo album on instagram. No one is going to shill for you just because you happen to post on /lit/. Sidenote: why is that the go-to line for hack writers on 4chan when they try to shill for themselves? This isn't an underdog sports team or a summer camp, so what is this bizarre expectation that everyone on /lit/ is going to rally the banners whenever some mediocre failure comes along with a sockpuppet like "Well, sure, it's need editing pretty bad and it's not very interesting, but he posts here so we should all support him!"

Everyone can tell you made this meme yourself, even though you're referring to yourself in the third person, because it demonstrates the exact same lack of self-awareness and humor as your bland fiction. This meme works by being sarcastic. IE the "Chad" version is meant to be a way over the top reaction to the "Virgin" version, and the virgin version is supposed to be a normal person who is described as awkward to make the viewer feel self-conscious about normal behavior. It's not meant to be an earnest attempt to compare two different subjects. Go do something else.

>> No.19061334

>>19058208
Bane?

>> No.19061537

>>19059839
>therefore I give no sources, because it is indifferent to me whether what I have thought has already been thought before me by another

based

>> No.19061556

>>19060359
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B0z2WczrXME

>> No.19062071
File: 476 KB, 1080x1560, speed reading.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19062071

>> No.19063506
File: 1.34 MB, 1620x1120, sudcyl48ej271.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19063506

>> No.19063530

>>19063506
>sex is not human nature
>because it's not human nature
>IT JUST ISN'T OKAY???
This is astoundingly retarded. Is this real? Is this le ebin final boss of philosophy?

>> No.19063542

>>19063530
Pleb

>> No.19063567

>>19060256
always amazes me when people reduce heidegger to an ontical system to be obeyed by fiat. no wonder he transcended the method of being and time, he saw people like this turning it into a scholastic technology

>> No.19063637

>>19058817
>カウボーイビバップカウボーイビバップ
why choose this as ur name wtf

>> No.19063868

>>19061307
>t. Gardner

>> No.19063898

>>19063868
Gardner was an outlier. An irregularity that probably can’t be repeated. It seemed to only work for Call of the Crocodile. His other books are not memes as much. The distinction is that F Gardner actually bought 4chan ads so he obviously got more widespread appeal. Waldun did it with him Youtube Channel. These are both irregularities which broke the normal rules and resulted in meme status.

>> No.19063976

>>19063637
its a Spaniard/island Asian rape baby larping as a jap

>> No.19065031
File: 241 KB, 420x599, 7839702D-61C5-4259-8820-D8A1A14E66AB.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19065031

>> No.19065131

>>19063530
Pleb

>> No.19065141

>>19059332
I wish I'd died when I was 17. Or 18 or 19 or...

>> No.19065288
File: 48 KB, 850x500, blog-img--us-canada-border-highway-crossing-signs.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19065288

>>19063868
>>19063898
>>19061307
Gardnerites seething hard today, huh?

https://www.tiktok.com/@mr.wyeet/video/6934453035036855557

Card has real fans, buddy. And in case you didn't already here, People Mover is getting published by a major line in Q1 next year, so it looks like you lost.

>> No.19065465

>>19058085
Fucking KEK

>> No.19066190

>>19058055
I didn't watch this debate

Did Peterson get btfo or something?

>> No.19066203

>>19066190
yes kek, including the very spicy part where after calling everything and everyone under the sun "marxists", admits he has never read any karl marx besides the manifesto

>> No.19066445
File: 569 KB, 2934x548, 1631688045486.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19066445

>> No.19066694

>>19063506
lol this makes no sense,
Why should their object be human nature?
Why does it (not being their object) dishonor their human nature?

>> No.19066869

>>19066445
who is the dude handshaking the earth

>> No.19068143
File: 378 KB, 828x811, 1630629178994.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19068143

>> No.19068145
File: 312 KB, 828x804, 1630629532929.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19068145

>>19068143

>> No.19068238

>>19065288
>so it looks like you lost.
Dude. This is the fundamental reason you will never succeed as a writer.

Nobody is competing with you. Nobody cares about you. It's written all over that painfully earnest, profoundly outdated meme you posted earlier in the thread:
>written for the author's own enjoyment
>author unafraid to use his real name
>written and illustrated in one sleepless 55 hour blah blah
>author is this
>author is that
>author author author
It's obvious that writing, for you, is more about yourself and your reputation than it is about entertaining people or making interesting observations about life or anything at all. In your sad meme you go off about tokenism being cringe and now you're apparently quite willing to accept promotion from some inane tiktoker for being a native author or whatever. You have no genuine principles beyond a childish desire to seek praise from others. Stop annoying people with your painful begging for attention.

>> No.19068279

>>19059777
Kek literally me

>> No.19068346

>>19060325
I don't see the humour but the poem in itself is neat

>> No.19068495

>>19060840
pls

>> No.19068626

>>19068346
It is humorous to imagine Dolly Parton singing her most famous song but with the plot of the telltale heart instead

>> No.19068656

>>19059138
I want to write a man versus author story. It'd be so much fun to have the character in the margins screaming at the reader and author and showing up inbetween text lines of innocuous paragraphs

>> No.19068669

>>19068626
ohh, I'm not very familiar with Dolly Parton but I should've realised that it's a reference to her

>> No.19068670

>>19063506
If your actions do not conclude in the production of a 600 page metaphysical text, you're doing it wrong.

>> No.19068700

>>19068145
Americans don’t even got in September for fucks sake

>> No.19069399

>>19058092
This is still the best definition of Kafkaesque ever

>> No.19069419
File: 62 KB, 715x557, 1621052545679.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19069419

>> No.19069455

>>19058055
>>19058056
>>19058081
>>19058097
>>19059138
>>19059771
>>19059777
>>19060311
>>19060325
>>19061279
>>19061288
>>19063506
>>19066445
Literally not one of the images in the posts I've replied to is discernibly /lit/. Every single one of them would be right at home on any of the myriad trivial, normie-friendly f*cebook meme pages that dumb broads in undergrad scroll through instead of taking notes during a lecture. I fucking hate you and I pray that physical harm will come your way soon. Leave.

>> No.19070612

>>19069455
Holy buttblasted

>> No.19071404

Does someone have the image about that one author who was trying to find his way to kings road but couldn't stop using convoluted logic to ask the question?

>> No.19071429

>>19063868
kek
>>19061307
sorry for your loss.
>>19058059
based people mover

>> No.19071430

>>19069455
Based and correct. Every one of these "/lit/" humor threads is some "lmao i love memes am i rite fellow zoomers XD!!" FAGGOT reposting them from twitter or facebook.

>>19070612
Fuck you phonenigger tourist.