Cognitive Functions/MBTI discussion thread

[Anonymous No.19011472]

Let's talk about this. Do you believe these concepts have validity to it? Did Jung hit it right on the mark?

Which cognitive function do you believe is the MOST important that everybody should have?

[Anonymous No.19011490]

>>19011472
Jung never created the MBTI. He came up with the functions but he never grouped them together for personality types. That was Myers and Briggs.

[Anonymous No.19011494]

>>19011472
Go to >>>/r9k/ faggot

[࿇ C Œ M G E N V S ࿇ !KNDY3cHnRY No.19011542]

>>19011472
>Let's talk about this. Do you believe these concepts have validity to it?

IT IS NOT A MATTER OF BELIEF.


>Did Jung hit it right on the mark?

ON THE COGNITIVE FUNCTIONS? YES.


>Which cognitive function do you believe is the MOST important that everybody should have?

«Ti», BUT INDIVIDUALS ARE NOT REDUCIBLE TO THE PSYCHOLOGICAL.

[Anonymous No.19012508]

>>19011472
Just posting the best personality type.

[Anonymous No.19013726]

I’m a male INFJ.
Apparently I’m the rarest type.

I always knew I was special. I have to think about this.

[Anonymous No.19013758]

>>19011472
>Which cognitive function do you believe is the MOST important that everybody should have?
None is most important.

They all have their different expression depending on where they are in the stack, no type is above others and perfect.

There are indeed types which suffer the most like INTP or ISTP who when demonic due to life stressing them and hostile environment become apathetic and start doing domapine chase shit because they feel, or value like it with their lowest Fi.

[Anonymous No.19013794]

>>19011472
dominant functions are real the rest is bs

[Anonymous No.19013802]

>>19011542
What are your thoughts on the translation of BASED into BASADO?

[Anonymous No.19014147]

>>19011472
I've been studying this stuff on and off for several years now and still couldn't tell you what my type is because nothing really applies as well as I'd like it to. MBTI probably works for some people on a surface level but it's not a very good system.

[Anonymous No.19015084]

Why do people keep posting this cringe? MB is a bad personality test. Just get into astrology, that's more honest.

[Anonymous No.19015173]

>>19011472
INFP 4w5 458 IEI-Fe

ama

[Anonymous No.19015258]

>>19015173
Why would you want to live as an INFP? Just kill yourself.

[Anonymous No.19015271]

>>19015258
I enjoy being one. Being an Fi dom + having my massive gigantic balls leads me to be able to do whatever I want in life.

[Anonymous No.19015289]

>>19015271
Ehem...

You are worthless and stupid and no one cares what you think. You should be ashamed of yourself little INFP. You don't even know what you want most of the time, and here pretending to be a moral smart ass, to you true is what is morally agreed on. Just being there clumsy and unatentive.

Yikes.

[Anonymous No.19015301]

>>19015271
Btw, I am sorry, but where ever I am, I must bully INFPs

[Anonymous No.19015308]

>>19015289
i'm an immoralist. "true is what is morally agreed on." is an Fe thing. if you knew of the other systems you would see that i am not the infp meme. i'm an sx/so 4 and my tritype has an 8 fix.

[Anonymous No.19015315]

>>19015084
This but unironically.

[Anonymous No.19015319]

>>19015301
should have gone all the way feggot. do you think the type of infp who goes on 4chan will easily be hurt by bantz?

it's ok, i forgive you. thank you for being nice. you could be mean, i don't mind.

[Anonymous No.19015327]

>>19015315
jung would make birth charts of his patients.

[Anonymous No.19015662]

What is the most schizo type?

[Anonymous No.19017663]

Someone redpill me on my type

[Anonymous No.19017744]

>>19017663
unironically cringier than being infp unless you're in the 99th percentile of INTJs who are actually brilliant

[Anonymous No.19017753]

>>19017663
Enjoy living with performance anxiety and pleasing others while being emotionally childish your entire life, because alternative is autistic NEET retardom.

[Anonymous No.19017758]

>>19017663
A no-nonsense type of person that can be an asshole to others (but at least they come by it honestly). Thinking style is highly susceptible to ideological inclination, being likely to be blinded by a direct line of thought, but can work towards ubermensch status by accepting empathy as an admirable characteristic (at least on an intellectual level).

[Anonymous No.19017775]

I’ve been thinking about this a lot. Cm someone tell me why INTP is ni/te for the sociotype description. I think it makes more sense but the mbti description has a way to make Ti fit into INTP.

I have ni but I don’t really see much te in my personality. What would it look like? Logical observations?

[Anonymous No.19017801]

>>19013726
So was Jung

[Anonymous No.19017868]

>>19017775
Ni is a perception function, so socionics would call Ni users percievers and put a P in the title - INTP

MBTI measures perception/judgement along the lines of what the outward behaviour is. Because Ni is an introverted function they would say an Ni-Te person is J because Te is a judgement function, and extroverted, so it is the one used to interact with the world.

The naming of types is quite an annoying hurdle that puts a lot of people off looking deeper.

[Anonymous No.19017917]

>>19017775
Te is evidence based thinking. Logic relating to what has been seen or heard, so observations and decision making is part of it.
It might look like a series of steps that you need to take, and Te has a tendency to want simplicity and efficiency.

Ti is more analytical and abstract. Ti users are more likely to tinker with things and analyse in a penetrating way.

[Anonymous No.19017937]

>>19017868
>>19017917
Thank you. I find it weird INTP can be called Ne dominant because I rarely use that function. I relate to the socionics definition completely.

[Anonymous No.19017976]

>>19017917
>Ti users are more likely to tinker with things and analyse in a penetrating way.
This might sound fun, until it is not and all Logos you posses you have to autisticaly lead up from bottom to top.