[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 40 KB, 640x480, glow.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18991127 No.18991127[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Let's have a fun thread for once.

Take the real redpill personality test used by the CIA (none of that cutesy feel-good shit like MBTI) and post your results along with your favourite book.

>64 different types
>no 'all personalities are valid' this one will tell you if you are fucked up

Take the test: https://www.pasf.org/pasq/index.htm
Once you complete primitive, use the response as input for basic factors to get your full type.

View all 64: https://www.pasf.org/b64types/b64contents.htm

>> No.18991143
File: 22 KB, 480x360, 4CE68FB5-4BBC-42DD-AAD2-B25F59E9644F.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18991143

>Hey guys, register with the CIA
>take it like a man! Grrr

>> No.18991167
File: 30 KB, 290x350, wow, its fucking nothing.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18991167

>>18991127
>real redpill personality test

No scientific literature establishing any predictive validity:

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Indirect+Assessment+Inventory%22

>> No.18991177

>>18991127
>take this spook personality test
No, fuck off

>> No.18991187

>>18991127
glowies really willing to try anything nowdays

>> No.18991189

>>18991167
>it's not believable therefore you can't discuss it!1!!
Alright autist-kun. The theory is called ''Personality Assessment System'', by the way.

>> No.18991236

>>18991189
>Alright autist-kun. The theory is called ''Personality Assessment System'', by the way.

Gittinger's model was based on other more standard psychometric inventories like Wechsler's. So why bother with this unproven test?

>> No.18991240

I'm not wasting my time answering 70 fucking questions for no reason

>> No.18991250
File: 70 KB, 600x900, charlie-brown_soul.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18991250

>>18991236
It's fun - the descriptions are colourful and there are many types. The descriptory value of it is not greater than its corresponding with commonly accepted truth about the human psyche.