[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 57 KB, 500x500, doors-the-doors-cover-front-500x500.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18896203 No.18896203 [Reply] [Original]

Is it a meme? The more i look at the soceital trends and the way everything is going i feel like accelerating the process is the only way to get out of the loop.

>> No.18896215

what do The Doors have to do with it?

>> No.18896223

>>18896215
Just a random pic

>> No.18896244

>>18896203
You are very wrong. Read Leo Strauss. Start with Natural Right and History.

>> No.18896267

>>18896244
I respect that but I don't think Leo Strauss knew about how internet opressed the "opposition" and any kind of "movement" towards "anything". I don't think he knew about echo chambers, algorithms and activism through art and social media (doing basically nothing).

>> No.18896272

>>18896267
Not a single one of the things you mentioned matters. Read Leo Strauss and you'll see that the tendencies you observe today have been present for a very long time.

>> No.18896282

>>18896272
>Not a single one of the things you mentioned matters
But why? You think we will overcome it?
>Read Leo Strauss and you'll see that the tendencies you observe today have been present for a very long time.
Now i certainly will.

>> No.18896343

>>18896282
>But why? You think we will overcome it?
They are not the problem in the first place. What you seem to be taking issue with is the collectivization of thought. He touches on this issue in multiple places, including What is Political Philosophy?, Thoughts on Machiavelli, On Tyranny, Natural Right and History, and Persecution and the Art of Writing. He also has an edited collection called History of Political Philosophy. If you read the chapter on Alexis de Tocqueville in there, you will see very clearly how old our problem is.

>> No.18896359

>>18896343
Crazy

>> No.18896480

Would rather talk about The Doors than this shit-for-brains "accelerationism" shit literally only people with an internet addiction care about. I know the term itself has been around for a long time but it's somehow been turned into a contemporary online neologism, it's a pseud trap that never leads to a productive discussion.

Strange Days is def their best, followed by LA Woman. The s/t is ok but it's marred by how self-serious it is, SD an LW are a lot more playful and Morrison's poetry is less obnoxious. Plus the band is more in their element, the s/t I would say is more like a collection of demos with no cohesion to them.

>> No.18896520

>>18896203
>The more i look at the soceital trends and the way everything is going i feel like accelerating the process is the only way to get out of the loop.
Imagine actually falling for the dumb meme notion of what accelerationism is.
God damn you dumb faggot, go and read, no serious accelerationist has ever advocated for 'accelerating the process' as nothing has ever died from contradictions. You stupid meme consuming faggot.

>> No.18896577

You doing a nosedive into faggotry changes nothing. Violence works if you use enough of it and aim it well.

>> No.18896604
File: 170 KB, 320x240, 1605149425931.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18896604

>>18896520
this.

>> No.18896640

>>18896520
based, OP is a massive faggot

>> No.18896720

>>18896203
Don't forget it shitting and farting and breaking down is how you know it's working

>> No.18896726

>>18896720
Unironically yes.

>> No.18896733

>>18896203
>Is it a meme?
Yes.

>> No.18896741

>>18896520
> no serious accelerationist has ever advocated for 'accelerating the process' as
Are tou joking or just that retardef?
These queers’ most quoted paragraph is the “or we have seen nothing yet” from Nietzsche which Deleuze used first.
>inb4 those aren’t serious acc philosophers
>inb4 “serious acc philosophers”

>> No.18896758

>>18896741
Nietzsche and Deleuze are advocates for contradictions not destroying anything, you dumb nigger.

>> No.18896779

Accelerationism is something only terminally
online leftoids living in their comfortable suburban homes think about it. It sounds like a good solution to end capitalism but it’s only because you wouldn’t personally be effected by it. Everyone else gets fucked over hard. You’d probably change your tune quick and fast when the right wing nutcase you voted in privatizes your healthcare and cuts funding to public utilities

Anyway, the Doors are a great fucking band love the End and I honestly enjoy the Soft Parade despite its mixed reputation

>> No.18896789

>>18896203
>>18896779
so people in /lit/ truly don't read, do they? you retards should be shot

>> No.18896827

>>18896758
> Nietzsche and Deleuze are advocates for contradictions
>acc advocates for destroying
can you please stop. This is getting ridiculous

>> No.18896847

>>18896827
You dumb nigger, Nietzsche and Deleuze are advocates for contradictions not destroying anything, that means Nietzsche and Deleuze thought that nothing would ever die from contradictions. Do you need for me to draw it? are you that fucking stupid?
No accelerationist advocates for destruction, that's the meme take you've read on shitty articles and memes. You are a retarded nigger.

>> No.18896856
File: 383 KB, 592x552, 1602725501908.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18896856

>>18896827
do you know how to read?

>> No.18896882

>>18896847
so why even mention the
>destroying anything
then? I think your reading comprehension regarding your own posts is incredibly poor. Or you just have a generally tenuous grasp on your language.
>also implying even the acc meme advocates for destruction, when only the conservative marxists have that cope