[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 181 KB, 1345x628, txart 1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR] No.18799603 [Reply] [Original]

Post them charts

Starting with some Evolutionary Psychology recs.

Extra points for science-related stuff.

>> No.18799638
File: 266 KB, 1660x688, txart 2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>> No.18799647
File: 269 KB, 1346x822, txart 3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>> No.18799656
File: 294 KB, 1601x808, txart 4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>> No.18799833

Is evolutionary psychology the biggest pseudoscience? None of them have any expertise in evolutionary biology to comment with any basis of knowledge.

>> No.18799859
File: 122 KB, 731x483, trilogiaa.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>18799833
K-Mac has

>> No.18799871

>>18799833
What do you think formed the patterns of human behaviour if not evolution?
Maybe you should read some of the research before dismissing the field out of hand.

>> No.18799880

>>18799833
Surely you're better off reading Kant you real bloke.

>> No.18799988

>>18799880
You could test Kant's theories at the very least. Philosophy in itself is just a way to logically determine "correct" behavior.
>>18799871
At the end of the day, they are extrapolating based on some facts about culture they were able to dig up. They could be correct, but very few of what they research is able to be tested. You can only, like philosophy, rationalize why it might be true. Evolutionary biology is simply looking at animal behavior and trait progression. None of them need to tell you why a cuckoo bird lays eggs in another bird's nest. They only need to explain its use. Psychology has to make inferences due to lack of physical evidence. It's why schizophrenia is still diagnosed based on matching behaviors common with the illness and not having any metric of which to physically prove the illness. Much less proof is required while evolutionary biologist have to dig up past remains just for them to prove lineage.

>> No.18800036

>>18799988
Axelrod's pretty much started the whole field with a lab test. Give his book a try, it's less than 90 pages long -perhaps a bit technical though.

In a nutshell: morality is the corollary of human cooperation. It can be tested, formalized, and there is abundant empirical evidence available.

>> No.18800547
File: 350 KB, 1195x2050, chart 1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>> No.18800553
File: 188 KB, 1049x1263, chart 2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>18800547

>> No.18800646
File: 1.89 MB, 1046x1460, chart 3.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>18800553

>> No.18800652
File: 1.35 MB, 1520x4648, 1625862190603.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>> No.18800663

Anyone have a Chinese lit/history chart?

>> No.18800671

>>18799603
Does anyone have the imgur link with all the charts? I remembered it existed but can't find anymore

>> No.18800679

>>18800671
I do

>> No.18800703

>>18800679
Nice, post it

>> No.18800704

>>18800703
I don't want to

>> No.18800739
File: 2.85 MB, 200x234, 1531586276826.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>18799603
Any books that talk about these foundational religious doctrines that I've taken into account? for example:
All religiosity can be classified into 3 fundamental impulses:
1. Return to the cosmic womb, Mommy Metaphysics(Gnostic, Vedanta, Plotinus who sucked on tits till he was 9 lol)
2. Act out the divine will and become an agent for the highest ideal, Daddy Metaphysics(Abrahamic faiths, Late stoic paganism)
3. Do as thou wilt and let no one stop you, Kiddy Metaphysics(Satanism, meme shit like Wicca, and Liberalism)
Any book rec's that talk about this?

>> No.18800778

>>18800704
Oh, okay, have a nice day

>> No.18800951
File: 1.59 MB, 1049x1458, chart 4.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>18800646

>> No.18800963

>>18800739
Joseph Campbell, Karl Kerenyi, Mircea Eliade.

>> No.18801027

>>18799603
No chart but here's my Romans reading list (covers various greeks too)
aeneid, Livy, Polybius, Appian, Sallust, epicurus, lucretius, pythagorean sourcebook, longinus, ovid, rest of virgil, Julius Caesar, Lucan, diogenes laertius, juvenal, numenius, persius, Cicero's letters, chaldean oracles, Augustus' Res Gestae, philo judaeus, Seneca's letters/plays, martial, thebaid, punica, epictetus, Plutarch, Tacitus, horace, Pliny's letters, Suetonius, lucian, Apuleius, petronius, plautus, sextus empericus, athenaeus, plotinus, porphyry, iamblichus, posthomerica, terence, ante-nicene fathers, Flavius Josephus, Marcus Aurelius, Cassius Dio, proclus, damascius, orations of julian, Herodian, the Historia Augusta, Zosimus, dionysiaca, Zonaras, saturnalia, life of appolonius of tyana, eusebius, augustine, Ammianus Marcellinus, Procopius, boethius

>> No.18802020
File: 3.09 MB, 1372x3500, PM lore.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>> No.18802086

>>18802020
First chart with good books in the entire thread, but it just rehashes the Harry potter joke

>> No.18802209

>>18799647
Ah, a cultural evolution text. Interesting to see this listed here. Can give additional recs if interested. This is my research area and I build computational models of cultural evolution. I’m currently reading The Origins of Order by Stephen Kauffman.

>> No.18802226
File: 3.84 MB, 1372x3500, 1628376522111.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>18802020

>> No.18802237

>>18800652
Debord should be here

>> No.18802248

>>18799833
Yes.
>>18799871
You could give lots of non-evolutionary explanations.

>> No.18802264

>>18800036
...or morality is an a priori faculty of the human mind's categorical manifold.
See why jumping to evolutionary explanations isn't convincing?