/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.18799246]

>Existential nihilism
>Ontological nihilism
>Analytic philosophy
>"Neo"-Platoism
>"Neo"-marxism/anarchism
>Marxist
>Leibnizian
>Hegelian
You guys realize that all these terms mean nothing in the real world, right? It is the philosopher equivalent of having 20 "oppressed" flags in your twitter bio.

[Anonymous No.18799256]

>>18799246
Based PepeChad telling the truth.
These terms show how much of a virgin you are.

[Anonymous No.18799552]

>the real world
Maybe if you read a little about ontological nihilism you would understand that this idea is nonsensical.

[Anonymous No.18799564]

>>18799246
Based anti-label Pepe

[Anonymous No.18799573]

>>18799246
You're going to need to prove the real world exists before you can convince me to care about it, pseud.

[Anonymous No.18799586]

>>18799552
>read a little about my made up word
No thanks bucko. I'm busy with 10th reading marathon of the ancient Greeks. Maybe reddit will appreciate your faggotry.

[Anonymous No.18799595]

>>18799573
>Prove the real world exist
Touch grass nigger. I'm not gay, I won't try to convince you of shit.

[Anonymous No.18799598]

I am well aware, but I am still an Anarcho-Nihilist Egoist.

[Anonymous No.18799599]

>>18799595
t. scientism fag

[Anonymous No.18799608]

>>18799246
>real world
Is inaccessible or even non existent.

[Anonymous No.18799611]

>>18799599
t. Ontological existentialist neo-platonic marxist with Nietzschean characteristics.

[Anonymous No.18799623]

>>18799595
based

[Anonymous No.18799767]

>>18799246
>You
presupposing a subject
>guys
Yikes, gender slanted language much?
>realize
foisting an epistemological frame without prior argument
>that
Concise indication, no issue here
>all
category mistake
>these
category mistake 2: redundancy
>terms
presupposing ontological significance of aforementioned, unconfirmed, therefor invalid
>mean/nothing
assuming conclusion of etiological significance in the premise
>in
Cosmological claim sans proof
>the
nigger-semen
>real
implicit claim of existential-import
>world
Presupposing object's existence
>right?
biting rhetorical flair, redundant
>It
What is? Grammatical error
>is
Possibility of an excellent claim failed by the prior mistake
>the
Concise indication, no issue here
>philosopher
Undefined term
>equivalent
secondary conclusion despite non-existence of primary, which thereby renders the former logically unsound
>of
Only the effeminized use a word like this before a verb
>having
Verb which necessitates a subject which you've failed to establish at the outset
>20
Utilization of a number without consideration/establishment of and for the Critical Idealist Kantian Epistemological Proof of Pure Mathematics
>"oppressed"
Politicized rhetoric has no place in philosophical discussions
>flags
Necessarily requires nominalism, which you've rejected in your premise, rendering this claim self-defeating
>in
Cosmological claim sans proof, again....
>your
presupposing a subject, again....
>twitter
Presupposing a component of a simulacra of the cosmologically untenable, a true low iq play.
>bio
Niggers shan't show so that innestmost niggeradly nigging hast not but a moment's reprive from the niggatry of the niggers aboust the niggspher of a nigger's niggnest.

[Anonymous No.18799853]

>>18799767
>You
Are
>Gay