/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.18796302]

what does /lit/ think about critical theory?

[Anonymous No.18796326]

[Anonymous No.18796341]

>>18796302
Don't care. I only read Greek philsophy and Roman histories.

[Anonymous No.18796357]

>>18796341
A lot of dialectic of enlightenment is about greek tragedy, the Frankfurt school was fucking based.

[Anonymous No.18796366]

>>18796357
Blah blah blah i love sucking cock blah blah blah post neo structuralism blah blah blah I'm not a faggot all these academic terms are not made up blah blah blah

[Anonymous No.18796374]

>>18796302
I have no time to think about such things as I am approaching the fundamental structure of reality

[Anonymous No.18796399]

>>18796374
Time for the normal pills!

[Anonymous No.18796797]

>>18796302
critically race this, faggot

[Anonymous No.18796817]

>>18796357
and it was all plagiarized from Benjamin

[Anonymous No.18796823]

>>18796302
was the person who took this photo a Nazi propagandist? seriously this is the epitome of what you would come up with if asked to visually depict "Judeo-Marxist conspiracy"

[Anonymous No.18796924]

>>18796302
A bunch of pseudo-intellectual frauds whose books should be burned and whose readers should be shoved into an oven.

[Anonymous No.18796990]

>>18796357
>the Frankfurt school was fucking based.
piss off

[Anonymous No.18796998]

I am very critical of it

[Anonymous No.18797006]

>>18796797
Critical race theory is a law thing, critical theory of race is a philosophy thing related to those fuckers.

[Anonymous No.18797017]

>>18797006
But critical race theory comes from the original critical theory of the frankfurt school, and even in frankfurt school writings you can clearly see the same basic ideas and origins of CRT anti-white propaganda.

[Anonymous No.18797616]

>>18797017
Theories don't anti-white people, people anti-white people

[Anonymous No.18797627]

>>18796302

[Anonymous No.18797628]

>>18796302
>bourgeois nomenklatura
>bourgeois nomenklatura everywhere

[Anonymous No.18797636]

>>18797627
We also put your hand in warm water while you sleep

[Anonymous No.18797648]

>>18797636
I know exactly what you do, why you do it and how you do it rabbi

[Anonymous No.18797651]

>>18796302
A bunch of incomprehensible verbal diarrhea, vague and dull mass of meaningless words and phrases pretending to be deep, pretentious and self-posturing which cannot stand up to scrutiny, self-defeating in denying objective truth, morally questionable as it originates from Marxism, horrendous scholarship, frequent misreadings of history and philosophy, literally nothing good has ever come out of critical theory and its derivations.

This is how they typically write
>We can clearly see that there is no bi-univocal correspondence between linear signifying links or archi-writing, depending on the author, and this multireferential, multi-dimensional machinic catalysis. The symmetry of scale, the transversality, the pathic non-discursive character of their expansion: all these dimensions remove us from the logic of the excluded middle and reinforce us in our dismissal of the ontological binarism we criticised previously.

[Anonymous No.18797658]

Love how Adorno rekt Jazz and Astrology.

[Anonymous No.18797675]

>>18797648
What is this racist fascist shite for ants?

[Anonymous No.18797680]

>>18797675
>buzzwords and screeching
this isnt 2016 anymore, need a new shtick Moshe

[Anonymous No.18797691]

Is the other actually a salvation or a another cope

[Anonymous No.18797707]

>>18796302
>what does /lit/ think about critical theory?
idk what lit thinks about it, but i think it is pure shit, pure jewish incelectually; its not marxism, its not leftism, its pure jewish bullshit, its pure capitalism.

[Anonymous No.18797718]

>>18796302
>What does /lit/ think of Satan-worshipping Communist Jews who are trying to subvert the values of Western nations

[Anonymous No.18797724]

>>18796302
>>18797718
>What does /lit/ think about the coming global slavery that will follow the collapse of society caused by the absolute degradation and abolition of moral values by The Eternal Juden

[Anonymous No.18797725]

>>18797680
shame you missed the obvious reference.

[Anonymous No.18797790]

(((mods))) at it again eh? You silly willies
https://archived.moe/lit/thread/18796302

[Anonymous No.18797868]

>>18796302
http://www.ruthlesscriticism.com/10_dogmas_critical_theory.htm

[Anonymous No.18797923]

>As the revolution turned into a low ebb in 1968, and once active revolutionary forces were once again integrated into the advanced industrial capitalist society, Marcuse reflected on the reasons for the failure of the revolution, turned to aesthetics, and elaborated on his aesthetic political thoughts. In the article "On Liberation", he believes that utopia is negative and transcendent, because we have the ability to change the existing concrete forms of the world and human life, as well as the ability to change any technology and natural environment, so utopia can be realized. He pointed out in "The Dimension of Aesthetics" and other works, "Art cannot change the world, but it can be dedicated to changing the consciousness and impulse of men and women who can change the world." Aesthetics expresses the fundamental attitude towards human nature, expresses the requirements of human liberation, and expresses the desire for freedom. Aesthetics is accompanied by the desire to transform society. Aesthetics is the only way for human liberation. Only beauty can lead to freedom. Marcuse discussed the liberating effect of aesthetic categories such as "remembrance" and "imagination" from a philosophical level. His "Eros liberation" theory ... embodies the resistance and transcendence of Utopia to the principle of reality and the pursuit of the "principle of happiness" of freedom and liberation, because [through] "Fantasy," people transcend the constraints of time and space and have the possibility of free creation; because of "dreams," people resist reality and turn what was denounced yesterday as "absurd" into truth and reality. The reason why Marcuse attaches so much importance to the theory of "Utopia" is because he wants to prevent people from losing their way in an integrated society through the humanistic meaning and ideals of "Utopia." [...] "It is precisely because idealism has established a goal that is totally worth striving for ... but opponents think that as long as it is described as utopian, this claim can be erased in one fell swoop. Utopian is a derogatory term. It's easy, but generally only short-sighted people use it."

https://youtu.be/xZQlscG7dcg

https://youtu.be/9wPq0M_T8JQ

[Anonymous No.18798253]

>>18797651
reminds me a book written about mossads greatest moments. there was a chapter were the agents had to interrogate a woman and the jewish authors start out saying "since we know females are very logical we went with a logical approach to get her to confess" then their interrogation transcript was entirely about stirring up the emotions of the woman. lmao. sneaky bastards.

[Anonymous No.18798300]

>>18797790
kek fucking hebes always up to their old tricks

[Anonymous No.18798374]

>>18796302
don't waste time on it and just go with kant and hegel bro