/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.18784191]

How does one stay constantly on their guard against the microfascisms of everyday life?

[Anonymous No.18784199]

>>18784191
lmao who gives a fuck bro just live

[Anonymous No.18784219]

The price of existence is eternal warfare.

[Anonymous No.18784228]

>>18784219
>"...never abandon the principle of struggle..."
>—Evola (I think)

[Anonymous No.18784231]

>>18784191
React hard against all microfascisms. Don't let them get a single foothold. If you give a nazi a finger they take your entire body.
You let a nazi get away with the n word today, they'll pull a shooting tomorrow and a nuke the day after.

[Anonymous No.18784265]

>D&G’s answer relies heavily on the notion of Microfascism, which is related to the micropolitics mentioned above. It’s related to the way desire produces rules. For instance, when I ride the subway, I follow a rule that tells me to take my MetroCard out before I get to the turnstile. Or, to take another example, I try to walk on the right-hand side of the stairs. But, frequently, I find myself behind someone who doesn’t take their subway card out beforehand, or who meanders around the stairs like it doesn’t matter. In response I think: they should follow the rules!—this is microfascism. It’s fundamentally the desire for the trains to run on time. But, notice, what I want here is for others to follow my rule. Maybe I even have reasons for this—it’s a good rule, after all!—but, regardless, this amounts to imposing my desire on others. Write this large and you get Mussolini or Franco or whatever.

Had to google. Jesus, what stereotypical hippie faggotry. I hope (and have a feeling) it was more subtle in D&G than this, but I assume most self-proclaimed followers of D&G are about as subtle as this. Fags.

>>18784228
That's my favourite Evola quote, and the true answer. The answer is not to be content with mere microfascisms. Identify the suprafascist transcendent and become macrofascist in the immanent. Rules for the sake of rules are meaningless. What matters is rules that are perennially true and thus worth following and defending.

[Anonymous No.18784277]

>>18784265
Are you an evolafaggot?

[Anonymous No.18784280]

>>18784231
>the slippery slope isn't real, just allow homosexual marriage!
>the slippery slope isn't real, just allow trans kids!
>the slippery slope isn't real, just allow pedophilia!

[Anonymous No.18784288]

>>18784231
I react against microfascism every day nigger

[Anonymous No.18784290]

>>18784265
Ego is now Fascist? Guess D&G really did want a hive mind society.

[Anonymous No.18784292]

>>18784199
That's what's I like to hear.
-Hitler (1933)

[Anonymous No.18784297]

>>18784265
Absolutely based

[Anonymous No.18784360]

>>18784265
This shit is something only sheltered academics can come up with. Embarrassing

[Anonymous No.18784444]

>>18784219
>freedom ain't free

[Anonymous No.18784462]

>>18784360
Retarded and historically illiterate take
>>18784444
Based quadquads

[Anonymous No.18784474]

>What if - instead of 'How Do You Make Yourself A Body Without Organs?' - one were to ask: How do you make yourself a Nazi? For this is far more strenuous than the 1980 diagnosis suggests.

>1) Wherever there is impersonality and chance, introduce conspiracy, lucidity, and malice. Look for enemies everywhere, ensuring that they are such that one than simultaneously envy and condemn them. Proliferate new subjectivities; racial subjects, national subjects, elites, secret societies, destinies.

>2) Burn Freud, and take desire back to the Kantian conception of will. Wherever there is impulse represent it aschoice, decision, the whole theatrical drama of volition. Introduce a gloomy atmosphere of oppressive responsibility by couching all discourses in the imperative form .

>3) Revere the principle of the great individual. Personalize and mythicize historical processes. Love obedience above all things, and enthuse only for signs; the name of the leader, the symbol of the movement, and the icons of molar identity.

>4) Foster nostalgia for what is maximally bovine, inflexible, and stagnant: a line of racially pure peasants digging the same patch of earth for eternity.

>5) Above all, resent everything impetuous and irresponsible, insist upon unrelenting vigilance, crush sexuality under its reproductive function, rigidly enforce the domestication of women, distrust art, classicize cities to eliminate the disorder of uncontrolled flows, and persecute all minorities exhibiting a nomadic tendency.

>To want to be in the right is the common substratum of morality and genocidal reaction;the same desire for repression - organized in terms of the disapproving gaze of the father - that Anti-Oedipus analyzes with such power. Who could imagine Nazism without daddy? And who could imagine daddy being pre-figured in the energetic unconscious?

>After all, lose control and you might end up fucking with a Jew, becoming effeminate, or creating something degenerate like a work of art. Does anyone really think that Nazism is like letting go? Theweleit's studies of Nazi body posture should be sufficient to disabuse one of such an absurdity. Nazism can turn you into a stiff before the messy passage into death.

[Anonymous No.18784478]

>>18784474
>Does anyone really think that Nazism is like letting go? Theweleit's studies of Nazi body posture should be sufficient to disabuse one of such an absurdity. Nazism can turn you into a stiff before the messy passage into death.
>In the late 1970s, at a time when what is today called gender history was mostly conceived of as women's history, driven by the effort to make women—female agency, impact, and suffering—visible in a male-dominated world, the German literary scholar Klaus Theweleit drew attention to the emotional world and gendered “phantasies” of men. It was a special group of men that Theweleit examined, however: the German Freikorps soldiers who, in the aftermath of World War I, and in a spirit of authoritarianism, militarism, nationalism, and misogynistic resentment, fought a civil war against democrats, socialists, communists, Jews, and women. In Theweleit's view, Freikorps men radicalized common Western and German norms about male self-control and “hard” masculinity into a perpetual war against women and femininity. It was not least the femininity that existed within men, as a desire for domesticity, tenderness, and compassion, that the men of the Freikorps wanted to “defeat.” Driven by the loss of a firm identity and ubiquitous fears of sexuality and states of liquidity, these men and their “male fantasies” spearheaded the rise and heralded the devastating impact of the Third Reich, according to Theweleit. Although his work was empirically based on a limited number of autobiographical writings by the individuals he examined, Theweleit, inspired by post-Freudian psychoanalysis, understood his findings in a quasi-universal sense: masculinity, male solidarity, and, above all, the steeled, armored male body appeared as the engines of a patriarchal order, with “perpetrator-men” and “victim-women” juxtaposed dichotomously.

[Anonymous No.18784501]

>>18784265
>any rule and trains being on time is fascism
Youd think this was satire but no lol. What the fuck do these people want, how on earth do they think anything is going to function

[Anonymous No.18784517]

>>18784265
Based, this is why authoritarianism is a necessity.

[Anonymous No.18784544]

>>18784501
>how on earth do they think anything is going to function
by implementing social authoritarianism through a patriarchal state

[Anonymous No.18784681]

>>18784191
>miscrofascism
when you have no evidence for your bogeyman so you shrink him down to microscopic size so everyone has to just take your word for it so you don't have to give up your flimsy excuse for pissing yourself on a daily basis.

why are leftists like this? did they get beaten too much? not enough?

[Anonymous No.18784731]

>>18784290
What do you mean with ego? What I get from the text is that D&G wanted the self to be precisely "free" from any social bounds.

[Anonymous No.18784738]

>>18784474
Very based

[Anonymous No.18784804]

>>18784191
>taking psychoanalytic theory seriously
>current year

[Anonymous No.18785122]

>>18784191
I care about them in a microscopic amount.

[Anonymous No.18785174]

>microfascisms
if you're being unironic you just need to be put down holy shit what is wrong with you?

[Anonymous No.18785200]

>>18784474
>>18784478
>Leftists will never understand Fascism volume 30801

[Anonymous No.18785349]

>>18784231
kys nigger

[Anonymous No.18785355]

>>18784474
>>18784478
you will never be a woman

[Anonymous No.18785550]

>>18784265
>If you think people should follow laws and society should be orderly you are a fascist

Bravo deleuze

[Anonymous No.18785554]

>>18784280
This is unironically what he advocated for though.

[Anonymous No.18785568]

>>18784191
Embrace them

[Anonymous No.18785941]

>>18784474
Chuds seething

[Anonymous No.18785946]

>>18784191
by baiting /lit/ evidently

[Anonymous No.18786545]

>>18784474
I thought Nick was a hyper-racist

[Anonymous No.18786581]

>>18784191
NOOOOOOOOOOO MUH MUSSOLINI OR FRANCOOOOO NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO IM GOING INSANEEEEEEEEE
MUST HAVE MY EQUALERINOS MY TRANNIES
Imagine being his ancestors, you bleed in Napoleon's armies for the glory of your country and you get faggots like this. Where did it all go so wrong and deranged?

[Anonymous No.18786585]

>>18784474
Insanely based
Unironic Nazi larpers and keyboard chuds and malding right now

[Anonymous No.18786591]

>>18786585
* are

[Anonymous No.18786621]

>>18786591
uh oh did you just correct yourself, you commited a microf*scism
you a nazi sweetie huh? talk to your local rabbi immediately

[Anonymous No.18786632]

>>18784231
>and a nuke the day after.
why would a Nazi utilize Jewish science/weapons?

[Anonymous No.18786658]

>>18784191
Microbashings.

[Anonymous No.18786677]

>>18784265
>In response I think: they should follow the rules!
I suspect he is referring to the increasing tendency to push for the homogenization of all thought, speech, and behavior and for it to be policed, not by the authorities, but by each individual voluntarily. If I were a Nietzschean, I would read Deleuze, but fortunately I am not. Read Leo Strauss.

[Anonymous No.18786684]

>>18786621
Kek, how will he ever recover?

[Anonymous No.18786687]

>>18784231
nigger

[Anonymous No.18786689]

>>18784191
By becoming fascist

[Anonymous No.18786704]

>>18784474
>>5) Above all, resent everything impetuous and irresponsible, insist upon unrelenting vigilance, crush sexuality under its reproductive function, rigidly enforce the domestication of women, distrust art, classicize cities to eliminate the disorder of uncontrolled flows, and persecute all minorities exhibiting a nomadic tendency.