[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 14 KB, 220x309, Freud.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18753316 No.18753316 [Reply] [Original]

He's literally just shitty Schopenhauer and Wagner.

>> No.18753326

>>18753316
Not really, although he does have some relation to Schopenhauer.

>> No.18753351

>>18753326
Basically everything
Subconscious = direct copy of will

>> No.18753404

>>18753351
He take it from von Hartmann, not from Schopenhauer.

>> No.18753451

>>18753326
It's just Schopenhauer merged with Wagner's artistic interpretation of his philosophy and introduction of psychoanalytic themes (castration, incest etc.).

>> No.18754366

>>18753404
He says himself in Beyond the Pleasure Principle: 'We have unwittingly steered our course into the harbour of Schopenhauer's philosophy. For him death is the "true result and to that extent the purpose of life", while the sexual instinct is the embodiment of the will to live.'

>> No.18754379

>>18753326
Schopenhauer says the Will is noumenon; that's pretty much the unconscious.

>> No.18754411

>>18753351
The fact that you don’t distinguish subconscious from unconscious tells me you haven’t read Freud. Why would you try to speak so authoritatively on this when you know so little? To seem smart on an anonymous origami fan site?