[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 369 KB, 1600x900, 975B60F1-F66D-41FC-B68A-2898B59C17B7.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18649956 No.18649956 [Reply] [Original]

>stoicism
>Buddhism
>Taoism
Is it safe to combine these ideologies?
They’re all about reducing suffering, changing yourself to fit the situation rather than changing the situation, big emphasis on meditation
I don’t see any issue in combining them.

>> No.18649964

>>18649956
It ultimately doesn't matter how you worship demons. Combine them if you wish, you'll end up in the same place either way.

>> No.18650432

>>18649956
Taoism is all you need but youll need the bhuddism to reflect

>> No.18650435

Once you are buddha all is dao

>> No.18650437

>>18649956
It's all bunch of Reddit blasphemy, read The Holy Bible and seek Christ. Or else, damnation.

>> No.18650440

>>18650437
Jesus himself spoke daoism he said christ is the way

>> No.18650784

>>18650437
Christcucks literally need to shove the Bible in their mouths. Just accept sky buddy isn’t here for you and you need to find peace within yourself

>> No.18650928

Daoism mixes well with other religions. It works as a kind of mystical backdrop.

Zen is basically Buddhism mixed with Daoism. And you can fit in stoicism as well if you want.

>> No.18650955

>>18649956
It is.

Here's a list of steps on how to do it:
1) Go back to R e d d i t

>> No.18650973

>>18650784
you'll never be a woman

>> No.18650994

>>18650955
this

>> No.18651413

>>18650955
>>18650994
What is the least Reddit belief system

>> No.18651558

>>18651413
Thelema

>> No.18651588

>>18651413
Esoteric Nazism. Hitler is an avatar of Vishnu.

>> No.18651596

>>18650437
One day you will be 18

>> No.18651621

>>18651588
teachings of Savitri Devi intensifies

>> No.18651632

Stoicism has always been Buddism for white people.

>> No.18652560

>>18651413
christianity , when you consider the reddit history and demographics

>> No.18652586

>>18649956
Isn't stoicism supposed to be rationalizing and the other two ineffable?

>> No.18653217

>>18651413
Rene Guenon (P B U H)

>> No.18653241

>Daosim
>r*dddit

biggest lie ever told
Daoism is far too erudite to be appreciated by plebs

>> No.18653255
File: 354 KB, 770x809, Sermon 8 ME.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18653255

>>18650784
>Just accept sky buddy isn’t here for you and you need to find peace within yourself
Please don't talk about things you haven't studied and don't understand.

>>18649956
If you need to combine a bunch of different philosophies and religions it means they are incomplete in themselves, deficient, and not ''the Way''.
Christ is the way, the truth and the life -- and Christianity is his religion.

>> No.18653304

To the Christian in this thread,
I am literally too dumb to understand your religion. Your religion isn't special in that regard since I have a difficult time reading in general due to intellectual disability, but the fact that I personally cannot wrap my head around your teachings means I will always be outside the church. I can't simply have faith, I need to understand; since I cannot understand anything, I cannot believe in anything. It is a very stressful situation.

>> No.18653349

>>18653304
Christianity is meant to save anyone, it spread among the slaves and fisherman in 100AD after all... you don't need secret knowledge nor complex analytical philosophy...in fact accepting it as a child is fine too if that's all your mind can handle.

''But Jesus called the children to him and said, “Let the little children come to me, and do not hinder them, for the kingdom of God belongs to such as these.'' Luke 18:16

"Truly I tell you, anyone who will not receive the kingdom of God like a little child will never enter it.” Luke 18:17

you can have a simple understanding of the basics and put your faith in Christ like a child and that's enough, if that's all you're rationally capable of

>> No.18653415

Sure but buddha-dhamma encompasses them all.

By that i don't mean mystical horse shit. I mean coming to an understanding of paticcasamupada and fully comprehending sensuality.

Check out hillside hermitage. Youtube

t. Have lived at a buddhist monastery for 5 years.

>> No.18653481

>>18653415
>lives in a Buddhist monastery
>posts on a mongolian basket weaving forum
I highly doubt this

>> No.18653751
File: 156 KB, 922x1277, IMG_20210714_221450.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18653751

>>18653481

>> No.18653866

>>18649956
I'd say Stoicism and Taoism are safe enough to combine. Buddhism is a bit different however. Buddhism seeks to reduce suffering while Stoicism and Taoism tend to turn more to indifference.
I think If you replace Buddhism with Cynicism, it would be much more accurate. Cynicism and Taoism both preach to live in accordance to nature. The Tao Te Ching even says, "The man reaching enlightenment may appear withdrawn from life, The enlightened may appear foolish". It makes sense when considering Stoicism derived from Cynicism. But no, Buddhism, while similar, does not fit in within the same sphere as Stoicism, Taoism, and Cynicism.

>> No.18653871

>>18649956
No. Follow christ instead of any of those.

>> No.18653896

>>18653866
Your understanding of Buddhism is very limited

Upekkha is the crown jewel of the seven enlightenment factors

>> No.18653929

>>18653751
Fucking epic dude

>> No.18653964

>>18653896
Yes, I'm not going to lie, I'm not too familiar with Buddhism. But I've had a pious Laotian friend lecture me. I know Buddhism is very diverse, but to me it doesn't address nature quite in the same way the Stoics or Taoists do. I see the end goal as the same but It would be an over simplification to lump Buddhism into the others imo.

>> No.18653973

>>18653964
Dhamma = nature
literally

>> No.18654269

>>18649964
>>18650437
you're twitter-christians, you have zero understanding of any other religions from the one you've been fed some months ago in order to be le trad contrarian
in two months you'll convert into god knows what, never post again

>> No.18654348

>>18649956

>is it safe to combine these ideologies?

no, you might die.

idiot.

>> No.18654353

>>18654269
seethe, cope, dilate, etc., et al.

Also cringe.

>> No.18654445

>>18654353
nobody feels like discussing your dying religion, in a few years practiced exclusively sub-saharan niggers
christian "philosophy" is a complete meme and you know it

>> No.18654448

>>18649956
I hate self help interpretations of classical thought so much.

>> No.18654569

>>18649964
Danes were right about killing christcucks.

>> No.18655910

>>18649956
Do what thou wilt. Pick and choose and combine idea from any idea, religion or philosophy to whatever you feel is best for your philosophy.

>> No.18656200

>>18653751
very based my man
can you explain the concept of Karma to me? raised as a Christian it sounds too much like guilt, but anti dualism would kind of make guilt impossible

>> No.18656211

>>18655910
>Do what thou wilt. Pick and choose and combine idea from any idea, religion or philosophy to whatever you feel is best for your philosophy.
this will never satisfy because the man knows he isn't seeking truth, whatever abomination he constructs will be blown apart by the wind because it had no foundation

>>18654445
“Enter by the narrow gate. For the gate is wide and the way is easy[a] that leads to destruction, and those who enter by it are many. For the gate is narrow and the way is hard that leads to life, and those who find it are few." Matthew 7:13-14

For the sake of Christ, then, I am content with weaknesses, insults, hardships, persecutions, and calamities. For when I am weak, then I am strong.
2 Corinthians 12:10

>> No.18656565

>>18656211
No, >>18654445 is right. Christianity has failed not because le devil won the hearts of the people, but because it was built on metaphysical sketchy foundations that eventually crumbled overtime. Christianity, since the reformation, and possibly the schism or even before then, has collapsed in on itself. Christianity simply cannot stand the tests of time because it is not grounded in truth.

>> No.18656642

>>18656565
what you say is true but my main grievance with christcucks on /lit/ is that they're essentially carbon copies of tradzoom larpers, and the blatant refusal to argue in good faith
I've argued with plenty of muslims but they actually argue and can be reasoned with, meanwhile the retards on here will larp as crusaders with ambivalent strangers online while their local church gets vandalized or pissed on by [informed citizens]

>> No.18656668

>>18654445
Have you read Aquinas?

>> No.18656861
File: 157 KB, 1280x720, WESTERN MAN.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18656861

>>18656565
>>18656642
the West is undergoing radical secularization in an environment full of psyops, consoomerism, lust and mindless distractions. They don't seek after truth, so they will not find truth, they will not find God... it's not like they've found a better metaphysical basis for their life, they aren't becoming Platonists or Stoics en masse lol, they don't care for truth, they are totally ignorant of metaphysics, philosophy and what is essential and objective in life; instead they are living day to day mostly like animals, satisfying whatever new desire or pseudo-struggle pops up in their mind.

But this is all expected and not surprising, there will be more and more persecutions of the truth, more people falling into darkness, avoiding the narrow path

>> No.18656905

>>18656668
Nobody who has anything interesting to say will simply ask if they've read X. It reminds me of when Sargon of Akkad would become exacerbated and start asking people if they've read Locke whenever he failed to defend his individualism. If you have something to say about Aquinas then fucking say it, but don't sit there and play these games probing for some way to dunk on somebody.

>> No.18656910

>>18649956
>changing yourself to fit the situation rather than changing the situation,
throw a few SSRIs in the mix as well

>> No.18656926

>>18656565
>Christianity simply cannot stand the tests of time because it is not grounded in truth.
Nothing about the current state of the world is grounded in truth yet it's going to be with us for the rest of human history.

>> No.18656939

>>18656905
you don't come off as well read in anything related to Christianity.

>> No.18656957

>>18656939
you are not required to read hundreds of pages of any given philosopher to engage with anyone on here, if you have something to say about Aquinas that pertains to this conversation, say it

>> No.18656959

>>18656939
I'm not the guy you're talking to. If you actually knew what you're about you would be up front about it. I've read quite a bit of Aquinas, the first book of the Summa Contra Gentilies, some of the commentaries on Aristotle, his sermons, and some of the minor treatises like On Being and Essence and On Kingship. Now what? Where do you go with the conversation now?

>> No.18657206

Why would you want to?

>> No.18657265

>>18656200
Read this;

https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/an/an03/an03.077.than.html

Also, look up angulimala, the Arahant and mass murderer. You will see that kamma is an impersonal force based on intentions, rather than some kind of cosmic moral weight.

>> No.18657289

>>18649956
Stoicism is christianity. The Logos is Jesus Christ.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ktNWD8XyCeo

>> No.18657802

>>18657289
Stoicism and Christianity are fundamentally incompatible. The doctrine of original sin more or less undermines Stoicism. The notion that man is flawed and incapable of living a virtous life without Jesus uproots Stoicism's blessedness of nature and reasoning. They may appear similar but are polar opposites.

Christianity=Jesus saves you
Stoicism= Save yourself

>> No.18658316

>>18650437
Nero did nothing wrong

>> No.18658801

>>18649956
Stoicism is buddhism transplanted to the Greeks and the transmission line cut off.
Taoism (as you understand it) is Buddhism + Ancient Taoism
Buddhism (is whatever initial cultural you learn from + early Indian Buddhist culture)

So really, the common denominator is early Buddhism. Aka theravada buddhism (mainly).

>> No.18659448

>>18649956
No. They aren't consistent. Daoism posits something as existing or it seems to. Buddhism is nihilistic ontologically. Stoicism can be combined with anything as it doesn't need metaphysics to function really as I see it.

>> No.18659479

>>18649956
>stoicism
>Buddhism
>Taoism
Didn't you consider vedic beliefs, i.e the Indian stuff that results from the vedas, upanishads, bhagavad gita etc?
Everything good about all 3 and way more besides.
>>18651588
Holy... Himmler keeping the Gita with him at all times now seems drastically less schizo.

>> No.18659501

>>18653415
>paticcasamupada
The most sophisticated nihilism conceived thus far. Should have done his duty and been a king.

>> No.18659525

>>18656200
Dont listen to heretical crypto nihilists expound on concepts their entire tradition misunderstands. Karma is a vedic concept and sid misinterpreted the vedas and upanishads and their true exponents with amazing obtuseness. A anon explained Buddhism vs "Hinduism" to me this way: If you get up and walk outside your house and then look in through the window and see no one its the height of stupidity to conclude no one lives there.

>> No.18659577

>>18651413
Salafist Islam, orthodox Vedic religion

>> No.18659589

>>18653415
Buddhism is crypto-materialism and nihilism. Absolutely retarded. Fuck advaitins too

>> No.18659597

Stoicism, Confuciunism, and Christianity is all you need

>> No.18659608

/lit/ solely looks at religions in terms of ‘based’ and ‘cringe’ and whatever is the funnest to LARP as, with no view to their truth. Yikes

>> No.18660267

>>18659608
cringe

>> No.18660633

>>18657265
Thanks! That makes it a lot more likely that I consider Buddhism my Religion one day, since the core concept of being born with guilt for something you did not commit (in this life) is a dealbreaker.

Just to write out what I took from that:
So karma is like a cloud surrounding your soul, if you do good things (or follow your Dharma or want to do good things) you accumulate a cloud of positive karma, if you do the opposite you accumulate a cloud of negative karma. The state of the karma surrounding your soul will inevitably lead to punishment or reward, but there is no judge. Just evil deeds attract evil karma which attracts evil deeds and vice versa.
Since monks consider the entirety of samsara, including the accumulation of good karma, as negative they would rather have absolutely zero karma and true understanding rather than having a lot of good karma and be reborn as a very high lifeform, because that would still trap them inside Samsara, just at the nicer ends of it.

>> No.18660721

>>18660633
Karma isn't some mystical force. It's literally just the actions you take. If I start hanging around heroin addicts, I will probably become a heroin addict, that's karma. If I read Buddhist literature and practice Buddhist ideas, I will probably be enlightened someday. There's nothing special about it.

>> No.18660792
File: 107 KB, 504x656, Feuerbach_Ludwig.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18660792

>>18660721
Given that the entirety of religion is just an abstraction of worldly human processes, in order to allow self reflection before self reflection, it is a given that it fits onto worldly events. It was created as a concept to explain them.
But I am fairly sure in buddhism Karma stays throughout reincarnation, which certainly gives it an element of mystique.

>> No.18660823

>>18660792
The reincarnation thing is that all you actually leave behind in this world is the results of your actions. Anything that could be considered you is your karma. Reimcarnation happens because your karma (willfull actions) cause more birth and death in the world. I'm butchering this explanation and I don't fully understand it myself. If recommend reading a book or listening to someone who's not a retard on 4chan larping as Buddhist.