[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 521 KB, 1020x1097, pol books 1 - sept 2015.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18581009 No.18581009 [Reply] [Original]

what do you think about this chart?
>nb4 go back to pol

>> No.18581048

Some decent, some memes, some trash, some not worth mentioning.

>> No.18581060

>>18581048
I only began reading it two days ago and i just finished a troublesome inheritance.
Which of these books should I just skip?

>> No.18581068

mostly garbage conspiracy books that are now long forgotten

>> No.18581069

>no Codreanu
There are better pol lists

>> No.18581254

>>18581060
Gottfried, James Gregor, Duchesne are worth reading. Roth is interesting enough but it's always a fine line walking on 'nature says this' reasoning. Like the other anon said, there are better 'right-wing' or whatever you want to call it charts out there.

>> No.18581279
File: 42 KB, 683x670, b01.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18581279

>>18581009
looks like over opinionated, unacademic, alt-right literature. Could be useful but these types of books don't really seem like they want you to formulate your own opinion as much as get you on their side.

>> No.18581293

>>18581069
"For My Legionaries" is an absolute crap.
One page (of the whole fucking book) is devoted to his political program basically "We'll do what the communists do, but with the king and justice, yes-yes"
And the rest is schizoid ranting on how the Jews once allegedly shitted into his food plate or something, propelling him on a revenge quest.

>> No.18581313

The Strange Death of Marxism is good. Not sure why it's on a "politically incorrect" list when Marxism has been criticized by many people.

>> No.18581317

>>18581293
Ok retard

>> No.18581322

>>18581293
You have to be romanian to understand, or at least balkaner. It wasnt written for amerigoym.

>> No.18581331

>>18581322
Nah you just need to be a non-retard

>> No.18581341

I don't get the point of reading this kinda crap. Why not just read Henry Fielding instead.

>> No.18582450

>>18581009
>what do you think about this chart?
honestly? looks pretty boring

>> No.18582461

>>18581009
Most of these aren't politically incorrect, they're just pseudohistory.

>> No.18582485

>>18581322
>You have to be a shithole that was stupid enough to fall for communism to understand this propaganda
No shit, Ivan.

>> No.18582511

Gottfried is worth reading

>> No.18582582

The Destruction of Jerusalem by Flavius Josephus

>> No.18582594

>>18581009
most of them look like self-published doodoo lol

>> No.18583691

>>18581279
Based.

>> No.18583698

>>18581279
>Could be useful but these types of books don't really seem like they want you to formulate your own opinion as much as get you on their side.

And this is not unique to the "alt-right." Hopefully you're not stupid enough to imply such a thing.

>> No.18583708

go back to pol

>> No.18583722

Gottfried is great. Recommend his trilogy about Marxism and his book on fascism. He is currently writing a book on anti fascism. Other books on fascism I like are written by the likes of A James Gregor, Stanley G Payne and Zeev Sternhell. Duchesne seems to be worthy of a read but I haven’t got to him yet. Ignore everything from arktos, the founder Daniel Friberg is a moron.

>> No.18584052

>>18581069
There are far better lists.
It seems like two thirds of the the lists made for /lit/ are garbage in general. The ones that are good are invaluable, though.
>>18581279
>alt-right
Stopped reading right there

>> No.18584531

>>18581009
I STILL haven't read mein kampf yet kek

>> No.18584583

>>18581279
>unacademic
how are there still people who think this is a criticism

>> No.18586151

>>18582485
Communism was imposed upon Romania and Bulgaria by the Soviets. Romania actually had the smallest communist party in Europe before the end of WW2.