[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

File: 85 KB, 907x1360, 61wMzlVtcJL.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Tue Jun 29 09:12:47 2021 No.18551504 [Reply] [Original]

To what extent did you understand this book?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 29 09:33:24 2021 No.18551612 >>18551504 I got filtered in Chapter one and got sent back to Hume's treatise for the first time

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 29 09:46:01 2021 No.18551680 I have never read it. I have a natural aversion to Kant, though I love Schopenhauer and Aristotle. Some people I just don't like.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 29 09:49:38 2021 No.18551702 little gobbo cunt, i hate him

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 29 10:01:56 2021 No.18551776 >>18551504 it all seems pretty straight forward

Anonymous Tue Jun 29 10:07:15 2021 No.18551806

Took me several reads but it's not that difficult once you understand it, which sounds silly but it's true. Peirce said he spent 3 years reading and re-reading the first Critique until he had basically memorised its structure. It's a book to test yourself with and to keep revisiting. It's a good litmus test for whether someone is serious about reading philosophy or not.

Parts of it will always be obscure, like the infamous transcendental schematism, but for the most part it's simple.

Here's a tip: The hard core of the book is shorter than it looks at first, because the Dialectic is much easier than the Aesthetic and Analytic sections. It's downhill past the Analytic.

Anonymous Tue Jun 29 12:26:25 2021 No.18552661

>>18551806
>>18551504
I still think people overcomplicate their approach to Kant, Hegel, and Heidegger. Over the years I've must seen hundreds of threads on reddit and 4chan on how the OPs claimed they tried reading their works just to abandon, return to and re-abandon without finishing on periods sometime spaning several years.

Outside of very rare circumstances (PhD level work) I don't think anyone will be required to know more about these types of works than you find in a free YT playlist or mp3 lecture course on them which should, in total, last for about 20-25 hours.

You listen 30-45 min/day and take notes and in 6 months you can have a solid understanding of these 3 figures that always intimidate people.

Anonymous Tue Jun 29 12:27:23 2021 No.18552669
File: 15 KB, 490x625, 1603996737279.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>18552661
>I still think people overcomplicate their approach to Kant, Hegel, and Heidegger. Over the years I've must seen hundreds of threads on reddit and 4chan on how the OPs claimed they tried reading their works just to abandon, return to and re-abandon without finishing on periods sometime spaning several years.

>Outside of very rare circumstances (PhD level work) I don't think anyone will be required to know more about these types of works than you find in a free YT playlist or mp3 lecture course on them which should, in total, last for about 20-25 hours.

>You listen 30-45 min/day and take notes and in 6 months you can have a solid understanding of these 3 figures that always intimidate people.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 29 12:28:35 2021 No.18552675 >>18551504 Much better after reading Prolegomena WHICH YOU ALL SHOULD DO.

Anonymous Tue Jun 29 12:28:42 2021 No.18552676
File: 134 KB, 974x998, 1624949648469.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>I still think people overcomplicate their approach to Kant, Hegel, and Heidegger. Over the years I've must seen hundreds of threads on reddit and 4chan on how the OPs claimed they tried reading their works just to abandon, return to and re-abandon without finishing on periods sometime spaning several years.

>>Outside of very rare circumstances (PhD level work) I don't think anyone will be required to know more about these types of works than you find in a free YT playlist or mp3 lecture course on them which should, in total, last for about 20-25 hours.

>>You listen 30-45 min/day and take notes and in 6 months you can have a solid understanding of these 3 figures that always intimidate people.

Anonymous Tue Jun 29 12:29:31 2021 No.18552679
File: 92 KB, 596x1008, 1612172906883.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>18552676
>>>I still think people overcomplicate their approach to Kant, Hegel, and Heidegger. Over the years I've must seen hundreds of threads on reddit and 4chan on how the OPs claimed they tried reading their works just to abandon, return to and re-abandon without finishing on periods sometime spaning several years.
>>>Outside of very rare circumstances (PhD level work) I don't think anyone will be required to know more about these types of works than you find in a free YT playlist or mp3 lecture course on them which should, in total, last for about 20-25 hours.
>>>You listen 30-45 min/day and take notes and in 6 months you can have a solid understanding of these 3 figures that always intimidate people.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 29 12:42:27 2021 No.18552748 >>18552669 >>18552676 >>18552679 4chan moment

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 29 12:52:35 2021 No.18552822 >>18552669 >>18552676 >>18552679 You bring nothing of value to the board. Leave.

Anonymous Tue Jun 29 12:54:07 2021 No.18552834
File: 12 KB, 427x400, 1611892758131.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>I still think people overcomplicate their approach to Kant, Hegel, and Heidegger. Over the years I've must seen hundreds of threads on reddit and 4chan on how the OPs claimed they tried reading their works just to abandon, return to and re-abandon without finishing on periods sometime spaning several years.

>Outside of very rare circumstances (PhD level work) I don't think anyone will be required to know more about these types of works than you find in a free YT playlist or mp3 lecture course on them which should, in total, last for about 20-25 hours.

>You listen 30-45 min/day and take notes and in 6 months you can have a solid understanding of these 3 figures that always intimidate people.

>You bring nothing of value to the board. Leave.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 29 12:55:27 2021 No.18552847 >>18552661 Playlists or podcasts to understand Kant? Spill them, anon.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 29 12:56:02 2021 No.18552850 File: 112 KB, 617x862, KantBTFO1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>18551504

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 29 12:56:30 2021 No.18552854 >>18552834 >You bring nothing of value to the board. Leave. What do you bring of value to the board?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 29 12:57:13 2021 No.18552857 File: 267 KB, 1143x830, KantBTFO2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>18552850

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 29 12:58:17 2021 No.18552859 File: 229 KB, 1165x853, KantBTFO3.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>18552857

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 29 12:59:16 2021 No.18552863 >>18552847 https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLcKLG0mfA3-9Sr2EPuCllMMxdFeAZuzz8 https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL8Nxd4OXpzqkWppWYGtXQTto46ac-OoCT

Anonymous Tue Jun 29 12:59:24 2021 No.18552865
File: 102 KB, 801x1011, 1612378425955.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>I still think people overcomplicate their approach to Kant, Hegel, and Heidegger. Over the years I've must seen hundreds of threads on reddit and 4chan on how the OPs claimed they tried reading their works just to abandon, return to and re-abandon without finishing on periods sometime spaning several years.

>Outside of very rare circumstances (PhD level work) I don't think anyone will be required to know more about these types of works than you find in a free YT playlist or mp3 lecture course on them which should, in total, last for about 20-25 hours.

>You listen 30-45 min/day and take notes and in 6 months you can have a solid understanding of these 3 figures that always intimidate people.

>You bring nothing of value to the board. Leave.

>What do you bring of value to the board?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 29 13:02:13 2021 No.18552884 >>18552863 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RLEL6o24uIA&t=3617s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ngPsLq_tTEM&t=11904s

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 29 13:03:06 2021 No.18552892 >>18552863 >literal woketard >>18552884 >Intellectual Deep Web

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 29 13:08:26 2021 No.18552928 >>18552865 This is how much it hurts being reminded you are a pseud. 4 triggered LARPERs in less time that it took me to write 3 lines. Beat my previous record.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 29 13:10:15 2021 No.18552934 >>18552928 Just keep flagging them

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 29 13:10:45 2021 No.18552937 >>18552892 post honest result to the Raven IQ test

Anonymous Tue Jun 29 13:15:13 2021 No.18552970
File: 571 KB, 686x720, 1612378604048.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>I still think people overcomplicate their approach to Kant, Hegel, and Heidegger. Over the years I've must seen hundreds of threads on reddit and 4chan on how the OPs claimed they tried reading their works just to abandon, return to and re-abandon without finishing on periods sometime spaning several years.

>Outside of very rare circumstances (PhD level work) I don't think anyone will be required to know more about these types of works than you find in a free YT playlist or mp3 lecture course on them which should, in total, last for about 20-25 hours.

>You listen 30-45 min/day and take notes and in 6 months you can have a solid understanding of these 3 figures that always intimidate people.

>You bring nothing of value to the board. Leave.

>What do you bring of value to the board?

>This is how much it hurts being reminded you are a pseud. 4 triggered LARPERs in less time that it took me to write 3 lines. Beat my previous record.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 29 13:17:24 2021 No.18552982 >>18552937 You won't believe me because this is 4chan but as a kid I scored 59/60 on raven's advanced matrixes. That was before the text was leaked online.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 29 13:19:23 2021 No.18552996 >>18552982 don't take this the wrong way but you seem to have lost a lot of brain cells over the years

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 29 13:22:49 2021 No.18553018 >>18552996 I am not sure what you are trying to achieve by insulting me without elaboration.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 29 13:27:14 2021 No.18553040 >>18552859 >>18552857 >>18552850 Schopenhauer already corrected Kant's theory, so this is all unnecessary.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 29 13:27:59 2021 No.18553045 >>18553040 Stop pretending you have read Schopenhauer. He doesn't even touch upon this.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 29 13:29:15 2021 No.18553061 >>18553045 Schop's corrected trancendental aestethic no longer contradicted the ToR before it was even developed. Stop being retarded.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 29 13:30:45 2021 No.18553071 >>18551504 For me, it's 22%.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 29 13:31:43 2021 No.18553080 Did his forehead get that way because he was beating his head against the wall?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jun 29 14:51:25 2021 No.18553603 >>18551504 im doing my best

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]