Is this a good list?

[Anonymous No.18404296]

If not, prove it.

[Anonymous No.18404349]

>>18404296
No.

Proof: It was obviously made by a troll or a retard.

[Anonymous No.18404354]

>deh!

[Anonymous No.18404357]

>a guide for intellectual homogeneity

[Anonymous No.18404359]

>atlas shrugged anywhere above shit-tier

[Anonymous No.18404390]

>>18404296
nice bait

[Anonymous No.18405143]

>>18404296
cuh-RINGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Anonymous No.18405218]

>>18404296
cuh-RINGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Anonymous No.18405243]

>>18404296
I'm gonna stretch my leg on your windpipe, nigger

[Anonymous No.18405315]

Switch Gatsby and Wuthering Heights
Switch Atlas Shrugged and Notes From Underground

[Anonymous No.18405332]

>>18404296
>Is this a good list?
It's actually pretty good. It's got five categories. Each category is populated by the same number of items. I'm really impressed that it also manages to compare different items of the same basic varieties. A common mistake I see with beginners' lists is that sometimes an apple slips in when you're listing orange cultivars. I've seen similar lists where the list-craftsman was comparing books to Tonka toys! Can you imagine? A Tonka truck listed at A tier and Debord's Society of the Spectacle in B! How are you supposed to make any sense of that? Anyway, great job, keep up the good work. This is a great sophomore effort – not necessarily displaying the expertise expected of a life long list-craftsman, but it's obvious you've got talent. Keep it up!

[Anonymous No.18405345]

>>18404296
no because you can't have Brave New World and One Hundred Years of Solitude in the low tier

[Anonymous No.18405359]

>>18404296
No
>prove it

>low tier
>Hamlet

It only takes one discrepancy to put the entire array into question.

[Anonymous No.18406043]

>>18404296
>”stretched their legs”