Islam = Evolian?

[Anonymous No.18398718]

Is Islam the only existent doctrine that is most in line with Evola's worldview? As far as I know it is the one remnant of Tradition that still has Sacred War as a central tenet expressed through its highest sacral text, and not just some post-hoc rationalization by later theologians.

In Islam the ghazi is afforded the second highest heaven after awliya/saints, for example. Do modern Hindu sects have anything equivalent? Where did the Kshatriyas go?

[Anonymous No.18398722]

>/lit/ - Schizophrenic ramblings

[Anonymous No.18398727]

>>18398718
No fuck kikes leave the foreskin alone
Vedas and Upanishads
Praise the Kshatriyas
It's Hindustan not Islamists
Praise Hyperboresus

[Anonymous No.18398736]

Evola praised all virile qualities. Islam has anti-life qualities such as "Don't eat garlic before coming to a mosque" and restrictions such as that "don't eat pork" even though high fat meat like pork and garlic literally give strong erections and make men more virile, especially those who can control their animal lust

All Abrahamic religions are anti-life affirming, even Islam that is the most virile of the abrahamic faiths. Evola was about tantric transcendence

>Like the Jews, the wise men of India have a belief that a certain particular Prana, or
force, resides in the Bindu, or semen. But all their theory of magick and meditation being a reverbatory, so that their "communing with God", is but a "communing with Self", and all their artifice directed to development of the powers in their own bodies and minds, as opposed to the Western idea of extending those powers to bear sway over others, we find naturally that just as they seek to restrain the breath altogether, or to avoid its violent extrusion from the nostrils, lest the Prana thereof be lost to them, and as they even practice to suck up water into the rectum, so that in defaecation they may be able to retain the Apana, or particular virtue thereof, and replace it in the Svadistthana-cakkra, so also much more do they extravagantly labour to retain the prime Prana of life, the Bindu. Therefore they stimulate to the maximum its generation by causing a consecrated prostitute to excite the organs, and at the same time vigorously withhold by will. After some little exercise they claim that they can deflower as many as eighty virgins in a night without losing a single drop of the Bindu. Nor is this ever to be lost, but reabsorbed through the tissues of the body. The organs thus act as a siphon to draw constantly fresh supplies of life from the cosmic reservior, and flood the body with their fructifying virtue.

Read the Yoga of Power. Evola was all about Tantra and the dangerous path which is the ultimate transcendence.

[Anonymous No.18399005]

>>18398718
Read the book "Julius Evola: The Sufi of Rome" by Frank Gelli.

He goes into great detail about supposed conversations that he had with Evola in the late 60's and early 70's before the death of the Magus.

As a result of these conversations and reflections, the author comes to the conclusion of a theory that Evola was indeed a secret Sufi, a form of Islamic mysticism, and that he had left many hints towards his true allegiances through his words, opinions, and writings.

[Anonymous No.18399833]

>>18398722
Schizo here, don't lump me in with the retards

[Anonymous No.18400032]

Obviously, he expressed certain affinities for Islam but then he also expressed certain affinities for Buddhism. Evola labeled himself a “A Catholic Pagan” which really is both a deeply misleading and yet deeply truthful statement. The guy was all over the place to be honest and even where one might be able to say that he wasn’t a Christian, or at least not a Catholic, he was only not a Christian or not a Catholic in so far as departed in some ways specifically from Christianity and specifically from Catholicism. It’s a bit ironic in that way. He was a Catholic who was interested in a fundamentally pagan philosophical project and I think he should be regarded as such despite his obvious remarks about Hermeticism, Islam, Buddhism and everything else. So as for the closest thing? Well, it’s a sort of pagan Catholicism then, isn’t it?

Fwiw I’ve read the Sufi of Rome and find it’s claims dubious.

[Anonymous No.18400127]

>>18399005
No one accepts the idea that Evola was a sufi, apart from that author. And it makes no sense to be a "secret sufi".

[Anonymous No.18400151]

>>18400032
I've read only a little Evola but he seems to be very critical of Christianity; where does he talk about identifying as Catholic?

[Anonymous No.18400195]

>>18400151
He referred to himself as a “Pagan Catholic” in court proceedings. But his writing on Christianity is all over the place, many of which are still only in Italian and French.