[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 6 KB, 192x262, images.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18392339 No.18392339 [Reply] [Original]

Why did he terrify the other Young Hegelians?

>> No.18392344

>>18392339
Nobody actually knows what he looks like

>> No.18392378

Why do Buddhists terrify Christians?

>> No.18392401
File: 7 KB, 225x225, Maxime.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18392401

Cant Stirnerism just fit into Hegel's dialecticism as an instantiation of power into the solipsistic egoist level?

>> No.18392426

The best thing is still just how much Marx and Engels spergt out about it.

>> No.18392459

I'd be terrified too if I saw a guy who was completely 2D

>> No.18392474

>>18392378
Nothing scary, nothing bad!

>> No.18392485

>>18392339
Because they knew most people reading him would turn into Ayn Rand turbosperg style mongs
There is idea, then there is idea in the actual world

>> No.18392545

>>18392426
>The best thing is still just how much Marx and Engels spergt out about it.
Tell me more.

>> No.18392584

>>18392401
What makes stirnirism solipsistic?

>> No.18392603

>>18392378
They don't

>> No.18392609

>>18392584
>solus
>ipse
could literally be translate to
>Only one
and
>his (property)

How is Stirner not solipsistic?

>> No.18392642
File: 173 KB, 1195x1367, 0d0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18392642

>>18392584
ALL of Solipism is Stirnirtistic
BUT
NOT ALL of Stirnism is solipistic

>> No.18392653
File: 132 KB, 552x303, imagem_20210604_174216.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18392653

>>18392485
FEAR THE RAND!

>> No.18392658

>>18392653
and the faustian man marches on

>> No.18392914

>>18392642
Good answer anon, but you think the idea of stirnerism is an oxymoron?

>> No.18392949

>>18392545
>Later, Marx and Engels wrote a major criticism of Stirner's work. The number of pages Marx and Engels devote to attacking Stirner in the unexpurgated text of The German Ideology exceeds the total of Stirner's written works.[77] In the book Stirner is derided as Sankt Max (Saint Max) and as Sancho (a reference to Cervantes’ Sancho Panza). As Isaiah Berlin has described it, Stirner "is pursued through five hundred pages of heavy-handed mockery and insult".[78] The book was written in 1845–1846, but it was not published until 1932. Marx's lengthy ferocious polemic against Stirner has since been considered an important turning point in Marx's intellectual development from idealism to materialism. It has been argued that historical materialism was Marx's method of reconciling communism with a Stirnerite rejection of morality.[47][48][49]

>> No.18393142

>>18392339
Well just look at how big his forehead was. What would you think if you saw someone with such a majestic forehead?

>> No.18393166

>>18392949
>Stirner "is pursued through five hundred pages of heavy-handed mockery and insult"
Haha, thank you.
>>18393142
He looks really weird.