[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/lit/ - Literature

File: 79 KB, 539x507, diogenes-plato-plucked-chicken.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Mon, May 17, 2021 05:25:42 No.18259168 [Reply] [Original]

top 5 philosophers from last century
go

PERSEY UBOMPA, THE INFAMOUS OU(...) Mon, May 17, 2021 05:32:56 No.18259204 [DELETED]

File: 50 KB, 728x678, YOUHAVESNEED.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>18259168
>>nnnnNNNNNNNNOOOOOOoooooooooOOOOOOOOooooooooooooo NOT LE HECKIN CHICKERINO nnnnnnnOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOoooooooooooooooOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

>>	Anonymous Mon, May 17, 2021 05:33:49 No.18259206 >>18259168 Ellul, Spengler, Whitehead, Guenon, Cioran.

>>	Anonymous Mon, May 17, 2021 05:35:12 No.18259210 >>18259168 Guenon even though he wouldn't like to be called a philosopher

>>	Anonymous Mon, May 17, 2021 05:35:38 No.18259211 >>18259168 Heidegger, Adorno, some anal, some anal, some anal. At least three of these are wrong. Heidegger, Adorno and at least one of the anals.

>>	Anonymous Mon, May 17, 2021 06:10:18 No.18259336 >>18259168 1. Martin Heidegger 2. Emanuele Severino 3. Carl Gustav Jung 4. Giorgio Colli 5. Carlo Michelstaedter Bonuses would be Evola, Guenon and Deleuze

>>	Anonymous Mon, May 17, 2021 06:13:47 No.18259350 >>18259206 Only Whitehead was a philosopher from that list >>18259210 Because he wasn't >>18259211 Adorno was not a philosopher

>>	Anonymous Mon, May 17, 2021 06:16:24 No.18259359 >>18259350 holy virgin >Hey anon, would you like to join me at my place today to discuss philosophers like Whitehead and Guenon? >You foolish girl! Guenon wasn't a philosopher! >[And with that, anon missed his one and only chance to have sex.]

>>	Anonymous Mon, May 17, 2021 06:17:50 No.18259369 >>18259168 Wittgenstein, Kojève, Rorty, Lukacs, Gödel

>>	Anonymous Mon, May 17, 2021 06:20:06 No.18259374 >>18259369 On second thought I'd say Dewey or Peirce over Godel. Stupid mistake.

>>	Anonymous Mon, May 17, 2021 06:21:19 No.18259379 >>18259369 Lukacs was stronger as a political philosopher; so much so that his major theoretical contributions were prior to 1923, and his only major later statement was on the quality of socialist realism. >>18259350 JAZZ MOTHERFUCKER

>>	Anonymous Mon, May 17, 2021 06:24:42 No.18259391 >>18259374 Peirce was a 19th century philosopher retard

>>	Anonymous Mon, May 17, 2021 06:25:55 No.18259394 >>18259391 He wrote things after the turn of the century. Your criterion is arbitrary.

>>	Anonymous Mon, May 17, 2021 06:28:19 No.18259401 >>18259394 >Your criterion is arbitrary. Okay then my favorite philosopher from last century is Plato

>>	Anonymous Mon, May 17, 2021 06:29:50 No.18259406 File: 82 KB, 500x473, no true scotsman.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>18259350 >not a REAL philosopher

Anonymous Mon, May 17, 2021 06:32:20 No.18259417

>>18259401
A remark born solely of spite and panic. You're upset because you didn't know that Peirce wrote and lectured after 1900 and spoke presumptuously - simple really.
1903 - Lectures on Pragmatism
1905 - What Is Pragmatism (The Monist)
1905 - Issues of Pragmaticism (The Monist)
1908 - A Neglected Argument for the Existence of God (Hibbert)

>>	Anonymous Mon, May 17, 2021 06:33:10 No.18259419 1. [Nihilist Atheist] 2. [Nihilist Atheist] 3. [Crypto-Buddhist] 3. [Nihilist Atheist] 4. [Nihilist Atheist] 5. [Nihilist Atheist]

>>	Anonymous Mon, May 17, 2021 06:35:10 No.18259426 >>18259401 >What is a century? Fuck off Socrates. NO GYM MEMBERSHIP HERE.

>>	Anonymous Mon, May 17, 2021 06:36:05 No.18259432 >>18259417 Doesn't make him a 20th century philosopher you dumb retard

>>	Anonymous Mon, May 17, 2021 06:37:12 No.18259437 >>18259432 Monumental cope. If someone was alive and writing philosophical works during the 20th century, they were a 20th-century philosopher.

>>	Anonymous Mon, May 17, 2021 06:38:15 No.18259441 >>18259426 >>18259432 >>18259437 see>>18259426 >>18259419 3. is twice.

>>	Anonymous Mon, May 17, 2021 06:38:25 No.18259442 >>18259437 Yeats is not a 19th century poet despite publishing in the 19th century. You're a retard and that's ok.

>>	Anonymous Mon, May 17, 2021 06:40:12 No.18259448 >>18259442 Yeats was a 19th AND a 20th-century poet, just like Peirce was a 19th and 20th-century philosopher. Crossways is a book of 19th-century poetry, The Tower is a book of 20th-century poetry

>>	Anonymous Mon, May 17, 2021 06:41:49 No.18259454 >>18259448 >Kant is a 19th century philosopher because he published something after the year 1800 You're autistic I get it

>>	Anonymous Mon, May 17, 2021 06:44:13 No.18259456 Heidegger, Wittgenstein, Deleuze, Husserl, Laruelle

>>	Anonymous Mon, May 17, 2021 06:44:25 No.18259457 >>18259454 >Kant is a 19th century philosopher because he published something after the year 1800 That's right - he was also an 18th-century one, because he published something before the year 1800

>>	Anonymous Mon, May 17, 2021 06:45:36 No.18259460 >>18259457 I'm sorry for your autism anon

>>	Anonymous Mon, May 17, 2021 06:45:59 No.18259461 >>18259460 That's all you got?

>>	Anonymous Mon, May 17, 2021 07:45:58 No.18259675 >>18259441 >3. is twice. it's non-dualism

>>	Anonymous Mon, May 17, 2021 07:48:09 No.18259686 File: 47 KB, 480x601, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>18259391 >>18259394 >>18259401 >>18259417 >>18259426 >>18259432 >>18259437 >>18259442 >>18259448 >>18259454 >>18259457 >>18259460 >>18259461

>>	Anonymous Mon, May 17, 2021 07:53:41 No.18259705 Heidegger, Ellul, MacIntyre, Wittgenstein, Deleuze

>>	Anonymous Mon, May 17, 2021 08:06:51 No.18259758 Land

Anonymous Mon, May 17, 2021 08:36:21 No.18259924
File: 134 KB, 500x500, 1610309741871.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>18259391
>>18259394
>>18259401
>>18259417
>>18259426
>>18259432
>>18259437
>>18259442
>>18259448
>>18259454
>>18259457
>>18259460
>>18259461
These are the "people" you share a board with, bravo /lit/.

>>	Anonymous Mon, May 17, 2021 09:57:03 No.18260287 >>18259168 Heidegger Schmitt Ellul Klages Jung

>>	Anonymous Mon, May 17, 2021 10:00:49 No.18260304 No clue who the other four are, but Hitler is almost objectively number one.

>>	Anonymous Mon, May 17, 2021 10:48:56 No.18260494 Popper, Camus, Fromm, Rawls

Anonymous Mon, May 17, 2021 11:25:14 No.18260717
File: 28 KB, 322x371, Husserl longchair.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>18259168
Husserl, Blondel, Shestov, Lukasiewicz, Simondon
Making it a top ten:
Lavelle, Gödel, Heidegger, Bergson, Gadamer
That's putting aside Urs von balthasar as more strictly a theologian even though he should be in the top five.

>>	Anonymous Mon, May 17, 2021 11:28:14 No.18260739 >>18260717 Can you explain your choices?

Anonymous Mon, May 17, 2021 12:41:05 No.18261186

>>18260739
I'll just give a word on the lesser known half.
>Lukasiewicz
His theory of many-valued logic is very important. Dabbed on fatalists and necessity obsessed writers. There is no recovery from this (not that it was serious after Leibniz anyway). Renewed and developed modal logic.
>Simondon
Wrote on many subjects, usually enlightening even if I have many disagreements. Most importantly he doesn't see technology as something separate from culture, life, or even existence. If anything, he should be read by /lit/ to counteract the neo-luddites all the while refuting the utilitarian "neoliberalism".
>Lavelle
Systematic metaphysician with little care for criticism, linguistic turns, anti-ontology or any of the various metaphysics denying bullshit, which is just refreshing. Also wrote much on the theory of values. An influence on several famous writers (Deleuze, Ricoeur) but a very confidential name by himself.
>Shestov
He did for the 20th century what Kierkegaard was to the previous one. Might seem strange to put him next to Husserl (who knew and appreciated him) but he is still the best attempted argument against rationalism.
>Blondel
He is what I expected from the pragmatists when I first started with them. His theory of action is the best there is, and that contains what analytics would call philosophy of mind.

That's it, I'm not explaining how Husserl (pbuh) was right about everything.

>>	Anonymous Mon, May 17, 2021 12:50:08 No.18261244 Heidegger Nishitani Foucault Gadamer Serres

>>	Anonymous Mon, May 17, 2021 12:51:16 No.18261251 >>18260304 Hitler was more of a philosopher-king than a philosopher. A man of action.

>>	Anonymous Mon, May 17, 2021 12:56:48 No.18261281 I think that psychoanalysis was the premier movement of the last century, far better than existentialism.

>>	Anonymous Mon, May 17, 2021 13:01:44 No.18261309 Wittgenstein Wittgenstein Wittgenstein Wittgenstein Jayden Smith

>>	Anonymous Mon, May 17, 2021 13:05:12 No.18261333 >>18261186 Based

>>	Anonymous Mon, May 17, 2021 13:20:55 No.18261448 Me Me Me Me Me

>>	Anonymous Mon, May 17, 2021 16:54:25 No.18262797 >>18260287 not bad

>>	Anonymous Mon, May 17, 2021 18:19:47 No.18263314 >>18260717 Very good list. I'd probably add Deleuze and maybe Laruelle, but that's a bit of a stretch.

>>	Anonymous Mon, May 17, 2021 21:31:39 No.18264282 >>18259168 Bataille Deleuze Camus Foucault Wittgenstein

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]