[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 11 KB, 264x356, Immanuel_Kant_001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18225731 No.18225731[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Would he take the vaccine?

>> No.18225758

He would be 287 years old. They wouldn't be able to test it on that demographic, so probably not.

>> No.18225795

>>18225731
Kant would be a maxvaxxer.

>> No.18225827

>>18225758
> wouldn't be able to test
That hasn't stopped them so far

>> No.18225833

He was a hypochondriac so yes. Also he would probably be forced to if he was lecturing at university.

>> No.18225841

Vaccine shills are everywhere huh

>> No.18225846

>>18225731
Yes

>> No.18225848

Which philosopher would adamantly be anti-vaxx?

>> No.18225856

>>18225833
>He was a hypochondriac so yes.
>"Take the vaccine that will cause a multitude of suspicious health issues to arise in your body for the off-chance it MIGHT stop the virus but not really because the vaxx lacks any sort of rigorous testing"

>> No.18225859

>>18225731
No, unless he had insider documentation of ALL the vaccine processes.

Also, Kant was alive during the british initial utilization of systematic cowpox vaccination. There might be a letter about his thoughts on the process due to prussia-british relations.

>> No.18225866

>>18225848
Foucault 100%

>> No.18225927

>>18225866
No, he'd be vividly anti-vaxx while saying you should get a vaccination anyways.