[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

File: 188 KB, 290x276, schopy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

18182222

Debunked authors Anonymous Wed May 5 14:29:14 2021 No.18182222 [Reply] [Original]

Post writers who have been thoroughly Debunked by more recent scholarship. I'll start

>>	Anonymous Wed May 5 14:32:13 2021 No.18182243 >>18182222 How was he debunked?

>>	Anonymous Wed May 5 14:33:19 2021 No.18182252 >>18182243 Which of his propositions is testable? What part of his work is useful in the lab? none.

>>	Anonymous Wed May 5 14:34:28 2021 No.18182257 File: 213 KB, 1273x1889, 78027CC4-7D84-4449-8DF0-503A152F0CDF.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] fun book, but this, yeah.

>>	Anonymous Wed May 5 14:34:49 2021 No.18182259 >>18182252 ah, a bugman.

>>	Anonymous Wed May 5 14:35:32 2021 No.18182263 >>18182222 >>18182252 You can't really 'debunk' a philosopher.

>>	Anonymous Wed May 5 14:36:44 2021 No.18182274 >>18182257 Where was he debunked? Just as valid as the rest of ps*chology

>>	Anonymous Wed May 5 14:37:12 2021 No.18182278 >>18182257 How was this debunked?

>>	Anonymous Wed May 5 14:39:00 2021 No.18182291 kek, obvious bait thread but people still get mad

>>	Anonymous Wed May 5 15:42:40 2021 No.18182743 >>18182252 Oh his work is unuseful? So that must mean it is debunked?

>>	Anonymous Wed May 5 15:47:42 2021 No.18182771 >>18182252 >durrr I can't test his ideas using my fixed man-made flawed method that I have never questioned deeply because I've been brainwashed to believe it's infallible.

>>	Anonymous Wed May 5 15:48:20 2021 No.18182778 >>18182222 nice quads, but what do you mean?

>>	Anonymous Wed May 5 15:53:12 2021 No.18182812 File: 143 KB, 750x606, caretoelaborate.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>18182259

>>	Anonymous Wed May 5 16:38:40 2021 No.18183070 >>18182222 Reported for shitposting