ITT: Times women were put in their place

[Anonymous No.18133459]

[Anonymous No.18133466]

>>18133459
>not the part where he says 'Frailty, thy name is woman'

[Anonymous No.18133472]

Why do Anglos love to cancel everything but they won't cancel sHACKespeare? it truly says a lot.

[Anonymous No.18133477]

>>18133472
Most cancelers don't have the mental capacity to actually read Shakespeare

[Anonymous No.18133479]

>>18133472
Shut up nigger

[Anonymous No.18133490]

>>18133472
He's too big to get cancelled.

[Anonymous No.18133502]

>>18133472
you can't cancel him, that's like canceling Jesus

[Anonymous No.18133598]

>>18133502
But Jesus has already been cancelled, goy.

[Anonymous No.18133621]

>>18133502
>that's like canceling Jesus

What do you think we've been doing for the past hundred years?

[Anonymous No.18133824]

>>18133490
No one is too big to get canceled.

[Anonymous No.18133856]

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » !!bGBGaUpA8kS No.18133870]

>>18133621
Making excuses for OT and NT inconsistencies, and now we’re trying on the jesus was a socialist hat

[Anonymous No.18133886]

>>18133856
Is that A Dashiell Hammett novel? I like his style

[Anonymous No.18133888]

Get thee to the nunnery

[Anonymous No.18133891]

>>18133824
Yes, they are. Cancelling stuff is not even real.

[Anonymous No.18133896]

>>18133490
For you

[Anonymous No.18133906]

>>18133886
The Maltese Falcon.

Of course, I can't read it now without hearing Bogart's voice. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wPT49WXC0Zo

[Anonymous No.18133924]

>>18133472
Shakespeare has so many different characters who say so many different things that if you attribute them all to him he is simultaneously a misogynist hyper religious monarchist, a nihilistic, suicidal, feminist, drunkard who also hates alcohol and thinks words are but wind but our reputation is what separates us from beasts, who hates the poor while being a zealous democrat.

[Anonymous No.18133936]

>>18133924
Shakespeare was the OG schizo

[Anonymous No.18134008]

>>18133502

[Anonymous No.18134020]

>>18133472
>>18133502

[Anonymous No.18134030]

>Kant once received a letter from a young lady who had read his works on ethics. Prizing Kant's genius, she sought advice on what she should do about a certain problem of hers. She was engaged to marry a gentleman whom she loved, but she was not a virgin. She wanted to know whether she should tell the man or keep quiet. Kant advised her that she must tell her fiancée. The fiancée broke off the marriage. Distraught, the woman wrote to Kant again, deeply troubled over the result of her decision and admitting she was having doubts over Kant's system of ethics. She asked if she might come to Koenigsberg to meet with Kant and discuss her doubts. Although he received the letter in a timely fashion, he chose never to reply. The woman committed suicide after some time.

[Anonymous No.18134033]

>>18133472
Because he's such an important figure in literature and is so old that his works have had thousands of different interpretations including ones from feminists trying to force in explanations of how his female characters were actually feminist icons

[Anonymous No.18134042]

>>18133896
Kek

[Anonymous No.18134048]

>>18134030
damn, saved.

[Anonymous No.18134073]

>>18133856
That book is one of my all time favourites

[Anonymous No.18134185]

>>18134030
lmao, based af

[Anonymous No.18135314]

>>18134030
WTF, is this true

[Anonymous No.18135466]

>>18134030
Based,fuck women

[Anonymous No.18135538]

>>18133886
Spade's (almost) monologue at the end of The Maltese Falcon should definitely be committed to memory. There are several nice Hammett moments where dames are told exactly where they stand:

---

Mimi shook her head. "These children! I mean you were pretty fond of Julia Wolf, weren't you?"

Dorothy called: "You want one, Nick?"

"Thanks," I said; then to Mimi, "I liked her well enough."

"You're the damnedest evasive man," she complained. "Did you like her as much as you used to like me, for instance?"

"You mean those couple of afternoons we killed?"

— The Thin Man

[Anonymous No.18135574]

>>18133896
>Jojo music plays

[Anonymous No.18135655]

[Anonymous No.18135669]

>>18134030
I think about this sometimes and smile.

[Anonymous No.18135677]

>>18134030
source?

[Anonymous No.18135692]

15. Mythical Anthropophagi

The man-hating woman, like the cold woman, is largely imaginary. One often encounters references to her in literature, but who has ever met her in real life? As for me, I doubt that such a monster has ever actually existed. There are, of course, women who spend a great deal of time denouncing and reviling men, but these are certainly not genuine man-haters; they are simply women who have done their utmost to snare men, and failed. Of such sort are the majority of inflammatory suffragettes of the sex-hygiene and birth-control species. The rigid limitation of offspring, in fact, is chiefly advocated by women who run no more risk of having unwilling motherhood forced upon them than so many mummies of the Tenth Dynasty. All their unhealthy interest in such noisome matters has behind it merely a subconscious yearning to attract the attention of men, who are supposed to be partial to enterprises that are difficult or forbidden. But certainly the enterprise of dissuading such a propagandist from her gospel would not be difficult, and I know of no law forbidding it.

I'll begin to believe in the man-hater the day I am introduced to a woman who has definitely and finally refused a chance of marriage to a man who is of her own station in life, able to support her, unafflicted by any loathsome disease, and of reasonably decent aspect and manners — in brief a man who is thoroughly eligible. I doubt that any such woman breathes the air of Christendom. Whenever one comes to confidential terms with an unmarried woman, of course, she favours one with a long chronicle of the men she has refused to marry, greatly to their grief. But unsentimental cross-examination, at least in my experience, always develops the fact that every one of these suffered from some obvious and intolerable disqualification. Either he had a wife already and was vague about his ability to get rid of her, or he was drunk when he was brought to his proposal and repudiated it or forgot it the next day, or he was a bankrupt, or he was old and decrepit, or he was young and plainly idiotic, or he had diabetes or a bad heart, or his relatives were impossible, or he believed in spiritualism, or democracy, or the Baconian theory, or some other such nonsense. Restricting the thing to men palpably eligible, I believe thoroughly that no sane woman has ever actually muffed a chance. Now and then, perhaps, a miraculously fortunate girl has two victims on the mat simultaneously, and has to lose one. But they are seldom, if ever, both good chances; one is nearly always a duffer, thrown in in the telling to make the bourgeoisie marvel.

— In Defence Of Women, H.L.Mencken

[Anonymous No.18136615]

Is the age of women as an inspiration to men-artists over?

[Anonymous No.18136678]

>>18133936
No, Will needed a paycheck.

[Anonymous No.18136802]

>>18135692
>or he believed in spiritualism, or democracy, or the Baconian theory, or some other such nonsense
This requires explanation.

[Anonymous No.18137135]

>>18135655
>not even good enough to stay in the kitchen
who wrote something so based?

[Anonymous No.18137274]

>>18137135
Nietzsche. This is from Twilight of the Idols, if I remember correctly.

[Anonymous No.18137277]

>>18134030
Kinda fucked up. She obviously loved her fiancé and also felt guilt over what she did (both are more than what you’ll get from most), and then after she willfully tells him the truth (again, more than most) Kant ghosts her… for doing the right thing? It’s like he punished her for accepting her punishment. Horrible cruelty, womanish even. I see myself in her suffering.

[Anonymous No.18137373]

>>18133459
"Woman is less qualified [than man] for moral behavior. For the woman contains more liquid than the man, and it is a property of liquid to take things up easily and to hold onto them poorly. Liquids are easily moved, hence women are inconstant and curious. When a woman has relations with a man, she would like, as much as possible, to be lying with another man at the same time. Woman knows nothing of fidelity. Believe me, if you give her your trust, you will be disappointed. Trust an experienced teacher. For this reason prudent men share their plans and actions least of all with their wives. Woman is a misbegotten man and has a faulty and defective nature in comparison with his. Therefore she is unsure in herself. What she herself cannot get, she seeks to obtain through lying and diabolical deceptions. And so, to put it briefly, one must be on one's guard with every woman, as if she were a poisonous snake and the horned devil.... In evil and perverse doings woman is cleverer, that is, slyer, than man. Her feelings drive woman toward every evil, just as reason impels man toward all good."
St. Albert the Great, Quaestiones super de animalibus XV q. 11

[Anonymous No.18137398]

>>18137373
>Woman is less qualified [than man] for moral behavior. For the woman contains more liquid than the man, and it is a property of liquid to take things up easily and to hold onto them poorly. Liquids are easily moved, hence women are inconstant and curious.
Did Charlie Kelly write this?

[I hate women No.18137408]

>>18137277
woman hands

[Anonymous No.18137420]

>>18133502
>canceling Jesus
done in 1789

[Anonymous No.18137425]

>>18137408
I wish, on me. But not any woman’s hands. My woman’s hands. On me. But I am alone with women, anyone who isn’t her. I am just a large lonely miserable man

[Anonymous No.18137435]

>>18137373
>When a woman has relations with a man, she would like, as much as possible, to be lying with another man at the same time. Woman knows nothing of fidelity. Believe me, if you give her your trust, you will be disappointed.
i am glad to read the oldest red pills which still applies today

[Anonymous No.18137440]

>>18137398
idk who that is but this is just basic science. you dont trust the science?

[Anonymous No.18137450]

>>18135655
based bobby fischer spiritual poster

[Anonymous No.18137456]

>>18137435
With women "the very consciousness of their own nature must evoke feelings of shame."
Clement of Alexandria, Pedagogues II, 33, 2

[Anonymous No.18137470]

>>18137277
>I see myself in her suffering.
You were doing fine until you wrote this, everything else was believable.
3/10, still made me reply.

[Anonymous No.18137474]

>>18137470
Not sure what you mean

[Anonymous No.18137485]

>>18137277
based empathetic anon

[Anonymous No.18137496]

>>18133896
For the Western world

[Anonymous No.18137522]

>>18137425
The traditionally masculine act is accepting punishment, living in spite of it. Effeminacy of spirit, so to speak, is to shrink away from this. Kant did well by her, but she could not accept her own consequences. It is like this with many men today; they have no backbone to shoulder the suffering inherent to earthly life.

[Anonymous No.18137542]

>>18137522
It gladdens my heart to see that I am not the only one who thinks this way.

[Anonymous No.18137552]

>>18137522
Anyone who suffers for nothing is worse than an idiot. Do you have any ideals? I doubt it. This woman did, and for it people turned their backs. So
I think you’re cruel and ignorant and a bit stupid, but it doesn’t really matter much to me these days. It’s so common. And it’s odd I even have the incentive to reply

[Anonymous No.18137608]

>>18137552
Ideals are suffering for an absence also; they "are not", otherwise they would not be *ideals*

[Anonymous No.18137670]

>>18137608
Confused with words

[Anonymous No.18137672]

>>18137670
Being and non-being produce each other

[Anonymous No.18137697]

>>18137552
I'm not rejoicing over a suicide. My view of suicide is that it is the worst action to take, under most circumstances. I think you're reacting more to the general vulnerability of women, (and of some men), who lack guidance in life. Lack of compassionate, pointed guidance can easily solve feelings of disarray in people's lives. Tragedies occur daily, but the least constructive thing is to succumb to the suicidal impulse.

[Anonymous No.18137714]

>>18137697
>Lack of ..
Typo, omit that.

[Anonymous No.18137799]

>>18137456
>the very consciousness of their own nature
If only they were capable of such self-awareness.

[Anonymous No.18137943]

>>18137277
The whore was no doubt looking for a replacement for her fiance in Kant. Why would he entertain the come-ons of a whore?

[Anonymous No.18137956]

>>18134030
>whore comits suicide
many such cases!

[Anonymous No.18137962]

>>18137277
She was a whore and got what she deserved.

[Anonymous No.18137975]

>>18137943
>>18137956
>>18137962
No dubs says not very based, anon.

[Anonymous No.18137982]

>>18137552
She was a whore and asked Kant for an opinion. Kant was honest. Not his fault the whore killed herself.

[Anonymous No.18139018]

>>18135538
Hammett's the fucking man. Chandler knew this.

[Anonymous No.18139082]

>>18136615
Yeah. The average modern whore isn't exactly an inspiring sight

[Anonymous No.18139163]

>>18134030
/our/ autist

[Anonymous No.18141019]

>>18135314
>>18135677
Maria von Herbert suicide
http://www.phil.bilkent.edu.tr/index.php/2018/12/15/story-behind-the-picture-maria-von-herbert/

[Anonymous No.18141060]

>>18141019
WHORE!