/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.18127573]

Was he a physicalist?
I know he thought metaphysics was life denying but does he ever go into any amount of detail about his own beliefs?

[Anonymous No.18127582]

>>18127573
Will to Power is metaphysics.

[Anonymous No.18127626]

>>18127573
>go into any amount of detail about his own beliefs?
Lol. Nietzsche is an atheist, so he has no fixed ''believes''. Nietzsche hates christian because christian think about the long term. Nietzsche wants to live in the present moment.

Do you know who else live in the present moment? Women.
Yeah that's right, atheism is feminism.

I will tell you everything there is to know about women, and then you can replace ''women'' with ''atheist'' in general and ''Nietzsche'' in particular.

one of the biggest red pills is the first time you realize that women experience literally no disconnect between saying X when it feels good to say X, and completely betraying and contradicting X five seconds later when it feels good to do that. women like to "try on" male-centric morals and virtues like children playing dress-up, but they don't actually know what it means to set up a virtue as an objective principle for oneself and then resist the temptation to break it in future moments when it stops being convenient and pleasant.

so if you ask a woman what kind of guy she values, she will blab on and on for hours about how noble she is and how she sees through superficiality and only wants sweet genuine men and etc., etc., etc. then five seconds later she'll completely contradict everything she said. the key thing to understand about women is that they don't perceive any difference here. from a man's perspective, you are thinking "but she said 'i only do X' and two seconds later she did 'non-X'?" this is because the fundamental modality of male consciousness is erecting principles and trying to follow them - even if you're a shitty man, it just means you're shitty and weak at erecting principles, not that the FUNDAMENTAL modality of principle-erection is absent. a woman's fundamental modality is "doing what i feel like." to a woman, that behavior is completely consistent: in the first instance, she did what she felt like. then she did what she felt like again. only a man perceives that the CONTENT of the actions was contradictory, i.e., would be contradictory if performed by a man. but for a woman whose primary stream of consciousness is "what do i want to do right now? :) perhaps i'll wear a ribbon in my hair tomorrow, tra lala!," no such contradiction occurred, or indeed is even possible.

[Anonymous No.18127684]

>>18127573
>Was he a physicalist?
No, quite the opposite of it. Physicalism sounds like something that an anglo analitycal philosopher could come up with, and Nietzsche was very upront with his dislike of anglo philosophers who tried to find a 'formula' for universe, be it with logicism, physicism or whatever.

If there's any metaphysical view that could be ascribed to Neetzsche it would be 'processism':
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Process_philosophy

[Anonymous No.18127711]

>>18127626
go off faggot

[Anonymous No.18127793]

>>18127626
Oh shut it christcuck

[Anonymous No.18127806]

>>18127626
>Lol. Nietzsche is an atheist, so he has no fixed ''believes"
Stopped reading there. Let me guess your a chirstcuck, why don't you go suck Jesus off if you love him so much faggot.

[Anonymous No.18127855]

>>18127626
This is the most random, stupid, totally disconnected from reality, generalist, cringe prejudice I've read this month

[Anonymous No.18127860]

>>18127684
It's not this simple.
Nietzsche considered dedicating ten years to the physical sciences. And don't forget his comment that nutritional questions are greater than any theology.
Your resentment of the anglos only causes you to become them, unconsciously and ironically.

[Anonymous No.18127869]

>>18127806
Hi butterfly

[Anonymous No.18127872]

>>18127573
He was partial to field theory over atomism.

[Anonymous No.18127875]

>>18127860
>Nietzsche considered dedicating ten years to the physical sciences.
Whatever he considered is not relevant - note that he wrote a book called "The Gay Science" but no book called "The Natural/Physical Science".

[Anonymous No.18127931]

>>18127875
>Whatever he considered is not relevant
Cringe

[Anonymous No.18127936]

>>18127931
Reply to my second argument.

[Anonymous No.18128089]

>>18127626
have sex lol

[Anonymous No.18128160]

>>18127860
Not that guy, but he is right. There are a number of passages in Nietzsche where he critiques positivism and physics for ignoring the greater mysteries in the world. Also will to power does have ontological status, and if we want to see N as having any kind of systematic thought it is certainly a sort of differential/process metaphysics akin to Deleuze or Bergson imo.

[Anonymous No.18128442]

>>18128160
What the fuck even is will to power

[Anonymous No.18128486]

>>18127860
That jab was just a rephrasing of the age-old wisdom "you are what you eat"

[Anonymous No.18128496]

Will to power isn't metaphysics but at the same time it is

[Anonymous No.18128500]

>>18127582
That's why it shouldn't have been published

[Anonymous No.18128502]

>>18127626
It's a Nietzsche thread and he still makes a rant about women being subhuman
The most based post I've read this year
>>18127806
>>18127855
You will never be women

[Anonymous No.18128695]

>>18128160
>>18127684
You can't deny the forms and truth without being a physicalist to some degree

[Anonymous No.18128739]

>>18128695
retard

[Anonymous No.18128755]

>>18127573
He was a german idealist you idiots

[Anonymous No.18128834]

>>18128695
>retard who just started reading philosophy and thinks Plato is the be all end all of thought

[Anonymous No.18128841]

>>18128834
>Plato is the be all end all of thought
He is

[Anonymous No.18128848]

>>18128739
Cringe
>>18128841
Based

[Anonymous No.18128852]

>>18128848
retard

[Anonymous No.18128877]

>>18127626
>Christians think longterm and are very deep
>tfw their metaphysics posit a definite beginning and ending of the world and they are just Aristotelian realists but with immaterial souls that get sent to the refrigerator after dying so they can have a party later when Christ comes again
>yeah dude, god just jerks off and one time he wanted to make the world and did it, but he is totally outside of time. His ways are so mysterious, am I right?

[Anonymous No.18128878]

Looks like a physicalist to me.

[Anonymous No.18128909]

>>18128841
Excellent post

[Anonymous No.18128930]

He was a naturalist. Everything is made out of natural processes, those that are active and dominate and those that are reactive and are subordinated. He would often distance himself from physics and materialism of his time.

[Anonymous No.18129060]

>>18128878
>The candle that burns twice as bright, burns half as long

[Anonymous No.18129078]

Who has the neetch soijaks?

[Jesus No.18129263]

>>18127626
based women. like children. honest and pragmatic.

[Jesus No.18129273]

>>18128878
died at 55. you know what average life expectancy was at the time?

[Anonymous No.18129281]

>>18127573
Yes. If you deny platonism you are a materialist and fir this reason: a nihilist. So, yes, OP.

[Anonymous No.18129288]

>>18129281
What a fucking brainlet you are

[Anonymous No.18129963]

>>18129288
Clueless fag

[Anonymous No.18130060]

>>18129963
Pseud faggot

[Anonymous No.18130099]

>>18129288
Yeah that other anon is right: you are clueless. I’d add also a submissive whore to your nihilistic guru, it’s funny how slave-master morality is just the expression of nietzsche’s own dogmas.

[Anonymous No.18130120]

>>18128755
Not even close, but thanks for the coom pic.

[Anonymous No.18130366]

>>18130099
>that other anon
Sure thing samefag. Keep seething.

[Anonymous No.18130786]

>>18128755
I wish I had a underage girl like that in my bedroom right now

[Anonymous No.18130910]

>>18127573
He's closer to a panpsychist, but any binding term that renders him on a universal scale is going to miss his point.

>>18127582
Will to Power as in Kaufmann's book was never published by Nietzsche. The notes inside of it can't be considered part of his philosophy, only passing thoughts that he jotted down, some or most of which he may have disagreed with. Will to power as in the idea has no metaphysical substance backing it, was not intended to be something that can be understood by everyone and does not establish a world that everyone can be a part of.

[Anonymous No.18130933]

>>18129273
70

[Anonymous No.18130957]

>>18127626
Based

[Anonymous No.18131041]

>>18130786
I wish I had a underage girl like that on my lap right now

[Anonymous No.18131105]

>>18129281
Have you ever thought about why he denied "Platonism"?

[Anonymous No.18131119]

>>18127573
>Existence monism posits that, strictly speaking, there exists only a single thing, the universe, which can only be artificially and arbitrarily divided into many things.
Imma go with this.

[Anonymous No.18131149]

>>18131105
Yes, because he was kinda of braindead.

[Anonymous No.18131178]

>>18131149
>kinda of braindead.
lmao

[Anonymous No.18131302]

>>18127626
Utterly based as evidence by the trannies seething if anything

[Anonymous No.18131518]

>>18127626
>Nietzsche thinks like a woman
Explain this then >>18130023