sup /lit/

[Anonymous No.1812535]

im back guys,miss me ?!

[Anonymous No.1812538]

Time stamp or gtfo.

[Rangaha !KJKZ7n2h3I No.1812536]

no

[Anonymous No.1812540]

No, go away.

Postmodernism is dead.

[Anonymous No.1812544]

rad thread about books

[Anonymous No.1812545]

>>1812538
Uh, wow. This isn't /b/.

[Anonymous No.1812580]

for whom wanted vagoo yesterday

[Anonymous No.1812584]

show me some boobies please.

[Anonymous No.1812586]

Hell No.

[Anonymous No.1812592]

>>1812580

>misuse of whom

Ultimate turnoff.

[­ No.1812594]

first time on /lit/
this shit happens here too?

[Anonymous No.1812600]

>>1812594

It's a recent, and hopefully short lived, development.

[Anonymous No.1812604]

Bitch, why don't you read some fucking books.

[Anonymous No.1812610]

>>1812592

It's actually correct.

It sounds better if it was 'whomever,' nonetheless it's still correct as it stands.

[Anonymous No.1812611]

>>1812584
im looking for some books,thats why it takes 5minutes between the snapshots

>>1812604
no bra today

[Anonymous No.1812617]

>>1812611

I'm twelve, and what is this?

[Anonymous No.1812618]

>>1812610

Ah fuck, you're right.

Well I still hate you, OP.

[Anonymous No.1812619]

Ugh. Please go away.

[Anonymous No.1812628]

[Anonymous No.1812632]

i like this thread.

[Anonymous No.1812637]

OP I want a girlfriend like you. A hot chick that reads books and shows her vagoo whenever I ask. Yes please.

[Anonymous No.1812641]

>>1812580
Gonna have to do better than that.

[Anonymous No.1812642]

>>1812535
This describes you perfectly.

[Anonymous No.1812646]

Hm?
Who are you anyway?
Are you here to talk about literature?
So many questions, so many tits and so few answers, I'm gone, gonna study BIOLOGY MOFOS!

[Anonymous No.1812650]

Where's your other thread? I missed it. Please continue posting pictures.

[Anonymous No.1812651]

Timestamp and better vag pic please, or GTF back to /soc/ or wherever you fake camwhoring trolls hang out these days. Nice tits by the way, if you are real.

[Anonymous No.1812653]

>>1812646
riveting tale chap
>>1812637
studying for my exams

[Anonymous No.1812656]

You're so beautiful, I want to hold you and make you feel safe.

[Anonymous No.1812663]

>>1812653

How about just a nice picture of you smiling at the camera?

[Anonymous No.1812666]

get this shit off the front page

[Anonymous No.1812668]

>>1812656

incompatible goals

[Anonymous No.1812676]

>>1812666
only the devil would want this off the front page

[Anonymous No.1812688]

>>1812656
LAST pic got deleted

>>1812663
i dont date nerds

[danky_danks !trdDG5AD.s No.1812694]

yr cute. but your eyes are sorta caved in

[Anonymous No.1812697]

Who is responsible for deleting pictures of this young lady? Whay can't /lit/ have camwhores too? It isn't fair I tell you. Sweetheart, was that a better vag pic they deleted on you? Send it to me and we can have a nice chat if you like. I have a nice big cock I might show you if you're good.

[PrinceCharming !!uPAynS9nRTz No.1812698]

why are girls such whores

[PrinceCharming !!uPAynS9nRTz No.1812703]

>>1812702
you might be ugly

[danky_danks !trdDG5AD.s No.1812702]

>>1812698

why is this true AND I still haven't fucked anything all weekend?

[Anonymous No.1812706]

>>1812698

stop reifying the patriarchy asshole

[danky_danks !trdDG5AD.s No.1812712]

>>1812703

not really. I think maybe I just lack that swag these kids have these days. That and most of the bitches I hang around with aren't good enough for a poke.

[danky_danks !trdDG5AD.s No.1812716]

>>1812611

haha I didn't even notice this bitch milking herself until now.

[Anonymous No.1812733]

>the patriarchy

[Anonymous No.1812739]

>>1812733

probably shouldn't've used the definite article but i'm really not sure that's worth making a post over man

[Anonymous No.1812750]

>>1812610
>for whom wanted

No, it's still wrong. "Wanted" needs a subject. Construct it as a question and which sounds better: "Who wanted vagoo?" or "Whom wanted vagoo?"

Come on you guys, I thought we were literate here.

[Anonymous No.1812759]

GO BACK TO /SCI? WHORE
WE APPRECIATE YOU THERE
JUST KIDDING WE ALL KNOW YOU HAVE LOW SELF ESTEEM AND VALIDATE YOURSELF THROUGH NERDS OGLING AT YOU
AND YOU ARE NOT HOT ENOUGH FOR /B/ APPARENTLY

[Anonymous No.1812761]

no, it's like "for whom the bell tolls," you wouldn't say "whom is the bell tolling?" either but it's still correct

[Anonymous No.1812770]

>>1812761
it would be: "Who is the bell tolling for?"
and that would be improper because of the preposition. so for whom does the bell toll? would be proper as a question.

her original post, wouldn't it be 'for whoever wanted vagoo?'

[Anonymous No.1812768]

>>1812750

>for whom wanted vagoo yesterday

>This is for whom(ever) wanted vagoo yesterday

She omitted the subject. It being the picture of the vagoo.

>"Who wanted vagoo?" or "Whom wanted vagoo?"

You're changing the subject to the person being referred to. In this case 'who' would be correct, but that's not how the original statement is structured.

[Anonymous No.1812772]

>>1812750

The easiest way is to ask it as a question - if the answer would be "him" then whom is correct. If not, then who...

Who requested vagoo? He did. So in this case, the slut with the little tits is incorrect.

To whom did the vagoo go? It went to him,

So. This trolling cunt, to whom we should direct our gratitude, has provided us with valuable learnings, if not photographs of her infected snatch.

[Anonymous No.1812774]

>>1812761
>>1812750
>>1812739

Grammar arguments. The only way to truly kill faggotry. You guys are my heroes. Stay classy.

[Anonymous No.1812777]

>>1812774

There are no arguments in grammar - it's one of the few areas of literature in which there is in fact a correct, non-subjective answer.

[Anonymous No.1812780]

>>1812777

Hahahaha, oh wow.

That's just not true. Compare any two usage dictionaries to see just how untrue that is.

[Anonymous No.1812781]

>>1812772

how do we know it wasn't a question with "for" in its conjunctive sense - "for whom wanted vagoo yesterday?"

[Anonymous No.1812786]

Push your boobies together Baby!! I love boobie cleavage on hot chicks!!

[Anonymous No.1812787]

I think the problem with this argument is that we're arguing over a poorly formed, possibly incomplete sentence.

Just sayin'.

[Anonymous No.1812789]

>>1812777

Prescriptionist detected.

[Anonymous No.1812790]

>>1812786
are you a closet homo? that just sounds so forced and insincere

[Anonymous No.1812794]

There are no arguments in grammar - it's one of the few areas of literature in which there is in fact a correct, non-subjective answer.

Ostensibly yes, but not always, language and grammar changes and evolves according to its users needs.

Ironically heres a faggot to show the follies of grammar correction:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J7E-aoXLZGY

"I'll leave you to tidy up the woulds and shoulds. wills and shalls, thats and whichs"

- Oscar Wilde

Argument extirpated.

- Chevalier de livres

[Anonymous No.1812801]

>>1812781
>>1812781

Still doesn't work. Re-read the sentence, and you'll see how the For fucks the question up. The question is still "Who wanted vagoo yesterday? He did". "By whom was vagoo requested yesterday? By Him" is the correct form, but that's not how it was written.

Anyway, the tip I gave works, although as in all English Language issues, there are almost certainly massive exceptions that you just have to learn. Anyway, it's my day off, so I'm not doing any more grammar today. Not for free anyway - 25 euros an hour for English classes.

[Anonymous No.1812802]

>>1812777

Correct as agreed upon by the largest group of people. This is why the English language is always changing; it is never static. To say that there is an absolute truth in grammar is false. While it may be true in that particular academic environment, it will differ greatly in varying institutions and time periods.

TL;DR

Grammar is not science faggot.

[Anonymous No.1812807]

Tense Present
Democracy, English, and the Wars over Usage
an essay by David Foster Wallace

http://instruct.westvalley.edu/lafave/DFW_present_tense.html

An essay that is now relevant to this thread. Some of you may find it interesting.

[Anonymous No.1812808]

>>1812777

oh yeah?

"Give us this day our daily bread." Matthew 6
"I must be cruel only to be kind. Hamlet
"Put on your shoes and socks!" My Mom
"Those gallant men will remain often in my thoughts and in my prayers always." MacArthur
"The helmsman steered; the ship moved on; yet never a breeze up blew" Rime of the Ancient Mariner

etcetera etcetera

[Hades !!gxdzsSnwykj No.1812823]

>>1812777

> There are no arguments in grammar - it's one of the few areas of literature in which there is in fact a correct, non-subjective answer.

> Mfw

[Anonymous No.1812826]

>>1812808
>"Give us our daily bread today."
>"I must be cruel and kind."
>"Put on your socks and then your shoes!"
>"Those gallant men will remain iin my thoughts often and in my prayers always."
>"The helmsman steered and the ship moved; yet the breeze wasn't even blowing"
fixd

[Hades !!gxdzsSnwykj No.1812833]

>>1812826

> fix'd

You can understand a sentence, but it doesn't fit your grammar rules, don't go blaming the sentence. That's like fitting a square peg through a triangular hole. Kindly gtfo, and come back when you've grown out of your prescriptivism

[Anonymous No.1812835]

This thread is now amazing! I never could have imagined we'd come this far /lit/. We have the chemo, now we must use it without prejudice.

[Anonymous No.1812837]

you bitch ass hoe ass hoe hoe, gtfo

[Anonymous No.1812869]

Hey, that's how we give people the bird in Morocco! Is that girl, by any chance, Moroccan?

[Sunhawk !nZQ2xl.g.6 No.1812899]

I thought TC was a litfag, not some random person.

[Anonymous No.1812926]

>>1812899
>TC

gb2gamefaqs

[Sunhawk !nZQ2xl.g.6 No.1812939]

>>1812926

I actually have windows open on both 4chan and gamefaqs right now. Thread Creator, what's wrong with that?

[Anonymous No.1812973]

>>1812706
gonna go ahead and cosign on this one even though i have a dick

[Anonymous No.1813146]

im in the bathroom getting ready for a party

[Anonymous No.1813152]

>>1813146
Well, since you restarted the thread, throw some goods.
Or start talking about books, both are good.