[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 49 KB, 514x146, 1619526902730.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18122005 No.18122005 [Reply] [Original]

How true is this?

>> No.18122008
File: 462 KB, 1220x1578, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18122008

>>18122005
This is now a jezebel thread

>> No.18122012

>>18122008
not even attractive

>> No.18122038

>>18122012
you are so wired off of non stop hardcore anal prolapse hentai porno that your standards are fucked beyond any semblance of reality

>> No.18122043

>>18122038
no, she's just a whore. oughta cover up

>> No.18122044 [SPOILER] 
File: 51 KB, 860x460, 1619527408309.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18122044

>>18122008
This is now a frog thread

>> No.18122047
File: 414 KB, 500x2486, 4y4d61.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18122047

>>18122005
He(pbuh)'s right

>> No.18122051
File: 722 KB, 1644x2384, 20210426_154213.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18122051

Read the better art critic

>> No.18122291

>>18122012
>>18122043
>another woman assessed and refused
>the anonymous incel wins again

>> No.18122389

>>18122291
He can't keep getting away with it.

>> No.18122441

Critics are parasites who only matter to other critics. They don't create anything, and their criticisms are rarely more than watch-me-justify-my-overpriced-degree masturbation that entertains no one but themselves.

t. degree in art criticism

>> No.18122442

>>18122005
Why are pseuds so obsessed with finding meaning? How much of a brainlet do you have to be to write something like this and think you’ve achieved truth?

>> No.18122523

>>18122005
A Bit of Fry and Laurie has several great sketches on critics and they hit the nail in the head.
Think about it this way - how many people you know, would recognise any famous painters 5th most famous painting? and how many of them could retell you the whole how-ever-many seasons of Kardashians or some shit.
"Art" is changing. Art is dead.
Critics are now inclined to follow cheap, mass production, and easy-to-consume products because the masses are into those.

Critics are fake, because the object of the art - book, painting, sculpture.. is infinite, their opinion is just one in a million, can never cover the whole of art, and is forever enveloped in errors of a human nature.

Ask artists and you'll get some insight into art, otherwise bring salt for those critics - cause you'll need quite a few grains.

>> No.18122661

>>18122523
It doesnt matter what the man of the street thinks about art, art only matters to a small groups of people who belong to the upper class, nobody else matters.

>> No.18122756

>>18122661
okay, still
critics =/= upper class

>> No.18122927

>>18122047
extremely based

>>18122051
the only thing Baudrillard is 'better' than anyone at is obscurantism and displaying his scientific illiteracy by misusing terms from every technical field he could think off

>> No.18122934

>>18122008
>slurrrrrp

>> No.18122994

>>18122008
me, sitting behind her

>> No.18123072

>>18122005
True art has nothing to do with ideology.

>> No.18123091
File: 23 KB, 200x310, bmph.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18123091

>>18122005

>> No.18123096

>>18122005
I’ll assess it bulletpoint by bulletpoint
>1
Wrong
>2
True, we are all copying God in the end
>3
This is proven untrue by scaruffis own analysis of the Beatles
>4
This is hilariously false and the attitude to art of someone with no soul and no ability to sincerely engage with it
>5
This is a cope for critics, all of whom are failures unable to create works of beauty

>> No.18123118

>>18122005
based and scaruffipilled
>>18122008
piss off coomer
>>18122047
wow
>>18122051
he's great
>>18122441
critics are definitely massive snobs

>> No.18123314

>>18123096
>This is proven untrue by scaruffis own analysis of the Beatles
How?