[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 3.68 MB, 1587x2245, 00.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18114388 No.18114388 [Reply] [Original]

This is my current reading list. Thoughts?

>> No.18114393

>>18114388
My thoughts are that the tone you've spent compiling this list and making this thread could have instead been used to actually read the books which are ostensibly on your list.

>> No.18114420

>>18114388
Probably haven't read Aristotle. Probably haven't read anything by Plato except for that 5 dialogue collection. Probably havent read Locke. Probably haven't read Hume. Probably haven't read Leibniz. Probably haven't read kant. Why are you reading Heidegger and Hegel, anon?

>> No.18114421

>>18114388
Not enough EVOLA

>> No.18114436

>>18114421
not OP, but Evola is top tier fantasy bullshit

>> No.18114449

>>18114388
some good titles. have you started anywhere yet?

>> No.18114452

>>18114420
Fuck off pseud

>> No.18114459

>>18114420
>t. snob
of course it's better to have knowledge of the history of philosophy, but these two titles stand largely on their own.

>> No.18114460

>>18114388
What is Grayling's take on Philosophy?

>> No.18114834

>>18114388
What's the last book you actually read?

>> No.18114860

>>18114388
you are extremely easily influenced and completely devoid of your own taste. and given its haphazard construction you won't understand what you read anyway. a paradigmatic pseud.