/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.18094131]

>Baron Books is pleased to present the first posthumous book by artist Namio Harukawa (May 1947 – April 24, 2020), dedicated to Harukawa’s archive of rarely published work.
>Forniphilia and domination has fascinated and preoccupied Harukawa, in his artistic practice, and was central to his life work. His artwork typically featured voluptuous women dominating and humiliating smaller men. His work has been exhibited internationally and received critical praise, from Oniroku Dan to Madonna, and found new contemporary relevance on social networks, from feminists, to liberators.

https://www.baronbooks.co.uk/product-page/namio-harukawa

[Anonymous No.18094138]

[Anonymous No.18094148]

>>18094131
>>18094138
Whoa baby. Yes I think I will preorder this fine piece of
literature

[Anonymous No.18094149]

[Anonymous No.18094155]

[Anonymous No.18094157]

This is unironically the future. By the end of the century this is what humanity will look like in part (although probably not so overtly dominating).

[Anonymous No.18094159]

>>18094155
kek

[Anonymous No.18094160]

[Anonymous No.18094198]

[Anonymous No.18094205]

>>18094198
its not fair this is what ive always wanted in life

[Anonymous No.18094207]

[Anonymous No.18094216]

[Anonymous No.18094222]

Why do I find this to be so erotic?

[Anonymous No.18094230]

>>18094157
post yfw you look up projected male fertility rates

[Anonymous No.18094244]

[Anonymous No.18094248]

gosh, i wish that were me

[Anonymous No.18094259]

[Anonymous No.18094269]

[Anonymous No.18094279]

[Anonymous No.18094287]

[Anonymous No.18094289]

>>18094259
hnngh
also a frog version for those posters that like memes

[Anonymous No.18094297]

[Anonymous No.18094310]

>>18094289
Do you have more of those?

[Anonymous No.18094317]

>>18094131
My ex gf had this guy as her inspiration. Love her brehs. Miss her. She had this bookmarked on her browser. You ever bust a nut so good your baseline of joy for the rest of your life is just way better?

[Anonymous No.18094318]

Eric Stanton is the American version of that

[Anonymous No.18094338]

>>18094310
afraid not

[Anonymous No.18094378]

>>18094131
Any pdfs of Harukawa's work?

[Anonymous No.18094384]

>>18094148

I hope they reprint Garden of Domina. Everyone should have this bad boy.

[Anonymous No.18094385]

>>18094207
That would break their necks

[Anonymous No.18094393]

>>18094318
Stanton is the perfect example of never giving up. His first wife was a cold and horrible woman who was completely opposed and angered by his art. She made him get a job delivering heavy parts and he ended up with a bad back for the rest of his life.

They divorced, and then Stanton was sad and didn't see anyone else. Until he met a big buff Norwegian girl who was fascinated by his work and would go on to proudly model for him. They later married and lived happily ever after. Soul mates.

[Anonymous No.18094401]

>>18094131
>>18094393
what drives women to literotica so much? what makes women center their life on sex? Is it atheism?

[Anonymous No.18094413]

>>18094401
What are you talking about bro? Harukawa and Stanton weren't women.

[Anonymous No.18094414]

What is this called
I want to do this to my bf but im not attracted to submissive men

[Anonymous No.18094425]

>>18094384

[Anonymous No.18094449]

>it's another coomer episode
oh wow!

[Anonymous No.18094474]

>>18094414
that doesn't make any sense

[Anonymous No.18094485]

>>18094131
two nukes weren't enough.

[Anonymous No.18094488]

>>18094414
become the man

[Anonymous No.18094494]

>>18094474
My bf likes eating pussy but he’s v dominant and i want to dominate him :(((

[Anonymous No.18094496]

>>18094131
This is blatantly pornographic and not artistic in nature.

[Anonymous No.18094511]

>>18094496
This is literature of the highest quality.

[Anonymous No.18094520]

>>18094488
one might suspect that the anon actually is a man

[Anonymous No.18094533]

>>18094520
No im female

[Anonymous No.18094555]

>>18094494
By virtue of him eating your pussy, you're already dominating him.

inb4 eating pussy is the dominant act

Only as much as getting facefucked means you're domming the person doing the thrusting.

[Anonymous No.18094575]

>>18094310

[Anonymous No.18094592]

>>18094555
greeks thought giving was masculine and recieving feminine, and they knew a thing or two about homosex

[Anonymous No.18094620]

>>18094555

Quite the opposite, I love eating pussy for the control over her pleasure, just to see her moaning and writhing to the end. Also, I'm a freak for legs and thighs so everything adds up.

[Anonymous No.18094622]

>>18094385
I think that's the desired effect

[Anonymous No.18094646]

>>18094222
Because it's erotica

[Anonymous No.18094673]

Is this just japanese crumb?

[Anonymous No.18094688]

>>18094673
in a way it could be

[Anonymous No.18094693]

>>18094131
This is pornography.

[Anonymous No.18094700]

>>18094259
Holy fucking based

[Anonymous No.18094701]

>>18094693

How so?

[Anonymous No.18094737]

>>18094131
Damn I feel sorry for the guy, how many Japanese women are that plump?
Should have been born in those South American or African tribes where fat women are the beauty standard.

[Anonymous No.18094829]

>>18094737
america would be heaven for him

[Anonymous No.18094837]

>>18094393

Makes me think about people like R. Crumb. Man, I wish I had a big amazonian wife.

[Anonymous No.18094841]

Me and butterfly don't like this type of shit. Even though I'm way younger than her, you can tell she really likes to be dominated by me. In fact, that central fact turns her on to no end :3

[Anonymous No.18094861]

>>18094131
Wtf is that a child!

[Anonymous No.18094887]

>>18094646
Curious.

[Anonymous No.18094923]

>>18094861
it has hair body, therefore not a child

[Anonymous No.18094953]

>>18094289
kekd hard
i hope he can rest in the heavenly pit of sweaty matronic tits

[Anonymous No.18094963]

>>18094393
we're gonna make it, brothers.

[Anonymous No.18094966]

>>18094414
>im not attracted to submissive men
disgusting rösti

[Anonymous No.18095089]

>>18094837

[Anonymous No.18095142]

>>18094414
>I want to do this to my bf but im not attracted to submissive men

Is there any subject on which women don't hold two disparate views?

[Anonymous No.18095185]

>>18094673
>>18094837
>>18095089
holy shit i was just thinking of him

[Anonymous No.18095211]

>>18095185

Crumbpilled.

[Anonymous No.18095219]

>>18095185
yeah what a vast coincidence that you both thought of him, can't imagine the odds of more than one person being reminded of him by this shit

[Anonymous No.18095285]

>>18094966
This is pretty universal bro.

[Anonymous No.18095300]

>>18094131
i dont understand how guys come from this

[Anonymous No.18095309]

>>18095300
It activates some sort of primal part of the brain.

[Anonymous No.18095345]

>>18095309
shouldn't the primal part be dominant, at least in males? makes no sense for a primal part to be submissive for them

[Anonymous No.18095352]

>>18095345
nature is all over the place when it comes to sexuality

[Anonymous No.18095367]

>>18095089
Based based based!!!! Yes mistress, let me, a small man, bury my face into your big tits!! Suffer my tiny peen!!

[Anonymous No.18095376]

>>18095367
Small males have large penises.

[Anonymous No.18095383]

>>18094414
Seething betas responding to this LOL

[Anonymous No.18095391]

>>18095285
Indeed, women being terrible is pretty universal.

[Anonymous No.18095398]

>>18094230
Irrelevant.

[Anonymous No.18095434]

>>18095345
You haven't lived until you've experienced a hot woman knee you in the groin. Feels so good to be put in your place like that.

[Anonymous No.18095438]

>>18095376
I'm pretty sure peen size has no relation to height.

[Anonymous No.18095441]

>>18095352
the submissive males wouldn't spread their genes
are you talking about the defects that males can have which make them submissive?

>>18095434
already experienced that and it's not good at all
you sound like a fag

[Anonymous No.18095449]

>>18095434
sounds horrific

[Anonymous No.18095459]

>>18095449

You jest

[Anonymous No.18095461]

>>18095441
You're the one who sounds faggy here.
For the record I find being dominant just as desirable.

[Anonymous No.18095466]

>>18095441
A male can be submissive to a woman and not submissive to other men. There is no defect there.
This thread is unironically the future of the human race. Tall large amazon women that give birth in litters and small males that can easily shoot and kill larger inferior inefficient "men"

[Anonymous No.18095484]

>>18095466
what a shame that dubs are wasted on such a retarded post

[Anonymous No.18095485]

>>18095441
>the submissive males wouldn't spread their genes
Depends on the circumstances.
For example, in Medieval Japan there was an era when faggy whiny soft men were considered attractive and the ultimate chads, because it meant they had enough money and resources to afford being weak. This is probably the psychology behind K-pop idols too.
I've also read somewhere that in the West, fat men were once considered to be attractive because to be fat meant you had resources and wealth.

[Anonymous No.18095491]

>>18095484
Cope and seethe
You can't stop evolution.

[Anonymous No.18095494]

>>18095485
those things aren't related to attractiveness itself, the women were with them because of the money, not because they were sexually aroused by them

[Anonymous No.18095496]

>>18094414
Sadism?

[Anonymous No.18095500]

>>18095441
>the submissive males wouldn't spread their genes
they would if they came in contact with dominant women

[Anonymous No.18095501]

>>18095491
>You can't stop evolution
exactly, which is why you are wrong
there will literally never be an age in which males are the submissive ones, they only exist in your fantasies, and those same fantasies exist because you hate yourself
re-evaluate your life, my friend

[Anonymous No.18095503]

>>18095494
How do you know?

[Anonymous No.18095505]

>>18094494
Wait, eating cunt is seen as non-dominant? I thought it was a courtesy.

[Anonymous No.18095506]

where do very tall girls hang out?

[Anonymous No.18095510]

>>18095500
the odds of that are very small, especially since even if the woman was dominant she would already be taken by a male, as the male is more often than not dominant

[Anonymous No.18095514]

>>18095449
It really isn't

[Anonymous No.18095518]

>>18095501
I guess submissive is the wrong way to put it.
The master race of small males and amazon women won't be submissive towards other subsets of the species. They will overrun and dominate them.

[Anonymous No.18095519]

>>18095510
>the odds of that are very small
nature evidently does not care

[Anonymous No.18095521]

>>18095503
because sexual attraction is one thing and material wealth is another, the latter doesn't have an effect on the former, or at least not directly (it does indirectly in a sense that with money you can make yourself look more physically attractive in multiple ways)
you're sounding like those idiotic women who are "sapiosexual", as if a male's intelligence can arouse them and make them feel sexually excited

[Anonymous No.18095526]

>>18095494
Then why are they attracted to K-pop idols?

[Anonymous No.18095535]

>>18095526
girly boys are attractive nowadays, what's confusing you here?

[Anonymous No.18095549]

>>18095521
Why were Japanese men attracted to ohaguro and hikimayu?
Why are tribal men not very attracted to boobs?
Why do you think sexual preferences don't change in line with societal trends and circumstances?

[Anonymous No.18095554]

>>18095285
Yes and it's fucked up and so-called feminism does nothing about it. Incelism is the most radical feminism, the real kind, since women can't wake themselves from their dogmatic slumbers.

[Anonymous No.18095557]

>>18095535
If they're attractive now why weren't they before?

[Anonymous No.18095559]

>>18095549
Dude anyone who thinks that fetishes or sexuality or dominance/submission has to do with "genes" is a literal retard who has no actual understanding of evolution or genetics or sexuality.

[Anonymous No.18095565]

>>18095559
Pretty bold statement to make, that genes have nothing to do with sexuality. I can't imagine you have any evidence that would strongly support such a contention.

[Anonymous No.18095571]

>>18095506
In Amazonia, duh

[Anonymous No.18095573]

>>18095549
>>18095557
>Why do you think sexual preferences don't change in line with societal trends and circumstances?
even if we accept this, it ultimately doesn't matter since what's important is related to current sexual preferences
maybe in 500 years a 150kg landwhale body will be attractive, but that's not the case now
if you want to be attractive to women nowadays you have to know what is attractive for them nowadays, and i'm talking about physical looks, not secondary stuff which will tie them to you but not make them sexually excited (which is what money, status etc. do - they can and do form connections, but not ones which are genuine, or at least not genuine when it comes to sexual attraction; it's convenient for women, since they don't need to be erect to accept a man, i'm betting it's not easy for a man to get it up for a woman who he finds ugly... then again. males have a higher sex drive so you have to be really ugly for a male to not be able to get erect eventually)

[Anonymous No.18095575]

>>18095565
>nothing to do with sexuality
Where was that stated? Genes play a role, as does culture, upbringing, etc.
Genes are not the most important factor. We know this because of the vast array of sexuality differences between cultures.

[Anonymous No.18095584]

>>18095575
>anyone who thinks that... or sexuality...has to do with "genes" is a literal retard
Are you really saying it's implausible that there are genes that make people more or less dominant, generally and sexually?

[Anonymous No.18095585]

>>18095571
I want her to be a witch who will shrink me and let me play in her boobs and then hypnotize me and interrogate me about everything she wants to know while my cock is fully erect

[Anonymous No.18095586]

>>18095575
>Dude anyone who thinks that fetishes or sexuality or dominance/submission has to do with "genes" is a literal retard
>Where was it stated that genes have nothing to do with sexuality?
Not who you replied to but you argue in bad faith and aren't worth replying to further

[Anonymous No.18095597]

>>18095584
Genes probably play a role but if you think some guy who has a fetish for fat chicks or diapers or something has it because of his genes you are retarded. Such a fetish can only occur due to environmental factors.
>>18095586
That statement does not say genes play no role you idiot, it's saying that the primary factor is not genes. There is no contradiction there, retard.

[Anonymous No.18095602]

>>18095089
I want to make her angry

[Anonymous No.18095622]

I'll never understand this face sitting bullshit.

[Anonymous No.18095623]

>>18095602
haha yeah imagine if she was choking you haha

[Anonymous No.18095634]

>>18095345
>shouldn't the primal part be dominant, at least in males?

Sure, but our brains are also sensitive to inversions: starvation v. gluttony, etc.

[Anonymous No.18095646]

>>18095597
The specific fetish I'd have to agree, though i'd never discount genetic effects entirely even if it's just a tendency towards extreme fetish in general or something like that.

Although with fat chicks I do think there could be a genetic component there, there are potential reasons why some sexual strategies(themselves partly genetically determined) would prefer fatter women(expected level of paternal investment for example).

[Anonymous No.18095668]

This thread needs more Crumb

[Anonymous No.18095671]

>>18095634
yeah, but how does this tie into this? you think submissiveness can be a primal part too? it makes sense for it to be a non-primal part and agression to be a primal part
e.g. extreme hunger makes you aggressive so that you can obtain food and survive

[Anonymous No.18095687]

>>18095646
My point is that looking towards what you think should be a logical argument from evolutionary psychology doesn't actually mean anything in terms of what turns people on and why.
This applies to any sexuality or fetish. We've been able to train people to become sexually aroused looking at penny jars. Sexuality is far more complex than just a pseudo-intellectual understanding of evolutionary psychology.
Guys who like the idea of fucking giant women or girls who are turned on by soft skinny korean dudes are not genetically distinct. There isn't a set of genes that codes for these preferences they are informed by culture and upbringing.
The misunderstanding of why men would like what's in this thread is caused by not understanding how sexuality actually works.

[Anonymous No.18095690]

>>18094131
Oral sex will give you throat cancer. You've been warned.

[Anonymous No.18095698]

>>18095690
w-what

[Anonymous No.18095703]

>>18095690
both types of oral sex carry this risk?

[Anonymous No.18095705]

>>18095671
>yeah, but how does this tie into this? you think submissiveness can be a primal part too?

That's kinda what I'm getting at. A lot of these things are two sides of the same coin, so your brain will process them in extremely similar ways. You can look at this stuff logically and say "Men are dominant, this is not sexual at all" whereas your limbic system is saying "Hmm, hold on a minute ..."

The primality of it doesn't dictate one way or the other about 'correctness' or 'survival' per se. Consider that after a famine, people who immediately stuffed themselves often died. Was gorging a primal response? Yeah. Was it conducive to survival? No.

[Anonymous No.18095710]

>>18095705
limbic system does play a role, but it's not really primal

[Anonymous No.18095712]

>>18095622
>I'll never understand this face sitting bullshit.

Read Milton

[Anonymous No.18095713]

>>18095698
>>18095703
https://www.cancerhealth.com/article/oral-sex-18-increases-oral-cancer-risk-80

[Anonymous No.18095715]

>>18095687
You don't actually know that, you'd have to do immensely complicated studies of sexuality and genes and see if there were relations between all sorts of things. I'm just saying there are plausible reasons for genes to impact sexuality, which is not an unreasonable statement. I mean any sort of human behavior should be affected by genes...

[Anonymous No.18095729]

>>18095713
pfft at this point what doesnt give you cancer

[Anonymous No.18095732]

>>18095687
>Guys who like the idea of fucking giant women
I'm sorry but what's weird about this? If a woman is bigger there's more of her to fuck

[Anonymous No.18095733]

>>18095713
The solution is to simply get a facesitting virign wife.

[Anonymous No.18095739]

>>18095732
There's nothing weird about it it's the future of the human race.

[Anonymous No.18095755]

See, I like these types of women; in fact, I am a pretty hardcore fatfag, so I can often get off to substantially bigger. But the domination aspect doesn't do it for me. On the contrary, I enjoy the soft, submissive aspects of plump/fat girls. The idea that their size and their rolls of fat have made them weaker than normal women, and more delicate. That they've become fat trophies, essentially idols, to whom other men have to offer their strength. I love the idea of assertively fucking a weak, out of shape fat girl, her big body jiggling and rippling as she huffs for breath, since this the most exercise she's done in weeks.

[Anonymous No.18095762]

now we just need a translation of Shozo Numa's 1,000+ page masterpiece The Human Livestock

[Anonymous No.18095765]

>>18095623
Haha yeah she should put me in my place

[Anonymous No.18095770]

>>18095755
I like both

[Anonymous No.18095779]

>>18095690
>>18095698

[Anonymous No.18095790]

>>18095755
The women in the pictures are amazons, not fat chicks.

[Anonymous No.18095796]

>>18095779
How does flaunting your degeneracy help end the shame?

[Anonymous No.18095808]

>>18095755
Plump Amazons are the hottest

[Anonymous No.18095811]

>>18095796
>husband and wife enjoying their bodies in their marital bed
>degeneracy

[Anonymous No.18095827]

>>18095811
She obviously got fucked in the arse by other people, otherwise she wouldnt have gotten the virus.

[Anonymous No.18095837]

>>18095710
Call it whatever you want, dude. Really activates the amygdala.

[Anonymous No.18095846]

>>18095622
There are pictures of this theme from the 1800s, so it's not like it's a new phenomenon.

[Anonymous No.18095857]

>>18095827
Good point. I didn't think it through. She must have been fun gal to date...

[Anonymous No.18095877]

>>18095846
There are a ton of fetishes that aren't new at all. We've been talking about the fat fetish in this thread and we know for a fact that that one is centuries old, if not millennia old.

You can often tell how "new" a fetish is by how "unnatural" it feels. That is, how unlike what happens in the real, physical world it is. Biggest and most obvious example is inflation. Inflation is very clearly a new fetish because nobody living in the Middle Ages or the Ancient World would ever even conceive of a girl being inflated and blown up like a balloon. They didn't even have balloons. Balloons had to be invented for this fetish to be conceived of, because it was not a thing that was "naturally" occurring.

On the other hand, in certain parts of the world, the tentacle fetish is very old. Like Japan. There are fucking woodcuts from the Edo period of women being groped by octopi. And for them, that was "natural."

[Anonymous No.18095885]

>>18095877
>Balloons had to be invented for this fetish to be conceived of, because it was not a thing that was "naturally" occurring
Not true, there are pufferfish