[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 441 KB, 711x648, zrW7KRhhZ0.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18092399 No.18092399 [Reply] [Original]

What did he say that Heidegger didn't already?

>> No.18092408

"Viola"

>> No.18092418

>>18092408
Kek

>> No.18092443

>>18092408
Based

>> No.18092627

He said it backwards

>> No.18092638

>>18092399
N-

>> No.18092650

>>18092399
There is nothing outside of context

>> No.18092663

>>18092650
Elaborate

>> No.18092667

>>18092650
What does that mean? There's no such thing as false interpretations?

>> No.18092674

>>18092667
Sorry, you're outside of context, I can't see you.

>> No.18092676

>>18092663
no
>>18092667
i reject the foundation on which the question is built

>> No.18092682

>>18092676
>no
Based

>> No.18092790
File: 1.16 MB, 1361x1815, jung.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18092790

Bump

>> No.18093055
File: 95 KB, 850x400, quote-all-sentences-of-the-type-deconstruction-is-x-or-deconstruction-is-not-x-a-priori-miss-jacques-derrida-124-0-043.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18093055

>>18092399
what didn't he mean by this

>> No.18093244

>>18092667
My understanding is this. He first said something like there is nothing outside of the text. Last part can be also translated as outside text. So once you say there is or is not, you enter the context of language which is a human construct. Without these words there is nothing. Not even nothing. Once there is something then it is always with the context.

>> No.18093296

>>18092667
no, its the opposite. Interpretation should be as much as possible according to the text itself. In Grammatology he was reacting to those approaches that interpret text as made up of outside forces (feminism with patriarchy, psychoanalysis with unconscious, marxism with class struggle etc)

>> No.18093306

>>18093296
>feminism with patriarchy
so did he like feminists?