Spengler

[Anonymous No.18090055]

>Wenn I reflect on my life, there is One emotion, which has controlled all and everything: Fear. Fear of the future, fear of relatives, fear of men, fear of sleep, of bureaucrats, of storm, of war. Fear, Fear. - Ich beneide jeden, der lebt. Spengler
So in the end, he was just a timid, scared and frightened little man, just like every other chud.

[Anonymous No.18090422]

>>18090055
All people who hold fascistic views are cucked faggots scared of there own shadows

[Anonymous No.18090502]

>>18090055
>chud
Twitter is that way

[Anonymous No.18090634]

>died in 1936
>Dune was released in 1965
If he had lived for another 3 decades he would have realized fear is the mind killer

[Anonymous No.18090651]

>>18090055
>fear of sleep

I have this too

[Anonymous No.18091924]

b

[Anonymous No.18092633]

still waiting for the decline of the west audiobook to get put up on torrent sites

[Anonymous No.18092640]

>>18090055
Terribly sorry, OP. I do not speak faggot. What is a chud?

[Anonymous No.18092646]

There's only 1 correct fear. Fear of the Lord.

[Anonymous No.18092714]

>>18092640
its a bait word to get 4channelers to give me easy bumps.
I have gotten two so far.

[Anonymous No.18092946]

>>18090055

He didn't write "men", but "people", not "bureaucrats", but "public agencies" (as in authorities).

He also writes about his extreme shyness towards women a lot and his childish dreams and sort of autistic fantasies of political grandeur. A lot of it does indeed sound very applicable to the -let's say- chud/incel type of psychology which quite neatly illustrates that that isn't just a contemporary phenomenon caused by ego shooters and social media or whatever.

I think he used these "diaries" as a cathartic exercise since he was so alone while writing The Decline. He makes a way more balanced impression in his letters and that impression strikes me to be more than the mere social facade of a correspondent. His numerous undertakings after his rise to fame imply he later came to grips with his anxiety.
These "diaries" aren't a joy to read, but it's nonetheless fascinating and touching to learn about these human and sensitive traits of his.
I started to translate these fragments here and there but I don't know if a lot of people would be interested in reading them. They don't make for these sort of vitalizing infusions of a lot of readers of his seem to be out for.

[Anonymous No.18093703]

>>18090422

slight doubt

[Anonymous No.18093845]

sex gifs

[Anonymous No.18095058]

>>18090651

guess how he died :^)

[Anonymous No.18095880]

>>18092714

make it 3 faggot

[Anonymous No.18096188]

>>18095058
heart attack... whats your point?

>>18092946
>He didn't write "men", but "people", not "bureaucrats", but "public agencies" (as in authorities).
it was a quick translation, and how is "men" not appropriate for "Menschen"?

I enjoyed reading the rest of your post. I won't require any translations though.

[Anonymous No.18096506]

>>18090055
My name is Isaac Schrader, go fuck yourself

[Anonymous No.18096529]

The right attracts paranoiacs, the left narcissists, what else is new?

[Anonymous No.18096640]

>>18096188
>heart attack... whats your point?

In his sleep bubba

[Anonymous No.18096686]

>>18092946
I, for one, would be interested.

Thank you.

[Anonymous No.18097098]

>>18096529
and the center attracts imbeciles, it seems

[Anonymous No.18097241]

>>18097098
Quite so.

[Anonymous No.18097399]

>>18096188
>how is "men" not appropriate for "Menschen"?

It's right in principle, but in this context the genderless term "people" would prevent misinterpretating "men" as "males".

>>18096686

Noted!

[Anonymous No.18097499]

>>18090055
>>Wenn I reflect on my life, there is One emotion, which has controlled all and everything: Fear. Fear of the future, fear of relatives, fear of men, fear of sleep, of bureaucrats, of storm, of war. Fear, Fear. - Ich beneide jeden, der lebt. Spengler

Literally me :)

[Anonymous No.18097557]

>>18090634
Yeah bro no one had that idea before Dune came out

[Anonymous No.18097964]

>>18090055
>chud
What did he mean by this?

[Anonymous No.18099375]

>>18090055
I think it's a lack of faith and trust and there's an element of optimism inherent in both faith and trust.

[Anonymous No.18099400]

>>18090055
He's honest enough to admit it. Most people aren't. Fear is the underlying, controlling emotion of all life, whether you admit it or not. There is only an interplay of pure will and fear.

[Anonymous No.18099426]

>>18099400
Not for me but I’m not a little vagina boy

[Anonymous No.18099441]

>>18090055
>just happened to be born in the western winter

[Anonymous No.18099455]

>>18099426
I guarantee that every decision you make hinges on your perception of the fear underlying, or reduction of fear resulting from, that decision. The only question is the strength of the will capable of surpassing the animal fear, whether of the unknown, of pain, or of lack of happiness, present in every living being.

[Anonymous No.18099525]

>>18099455
You are wrong and you are lacking in ability to perception from the point of view of others and what motivates them. Maybe think about what someone with a different belief system would refer to when decision making.

[Anonymous No.18099550]

>>18099441
holy kek

[Anonymous No.18099556]

>>18099525
Investigate your decisions beyond a surface-level and you will see that I am right (this requires deep, and self-honest, introspection without being overly sentimental, or pretending to be void of depth). And you will see that Buddhism is correct too, only that Buddhism is formulated in different terms, but essentially reaches the same conclusion (it relies on the idea of "ignorance", avidya, instead of "fear", although they are actually both symbols of the same exact phenomenon with very slightly different connotations).
>Maybe think about what someone with a different belief system
This has nothing to do with belief. This is the fundamental core of all phenomenal, samsaric consciousness and decision making. All of your beliefs, and thus every belief system, is rooted purely in fear, or ignorance, avidya.

[Anonymous No.18100498]

>>18092633
It's on MAM. I could upload it tommorow (can't today because reasons.)

[Anonymous No.18100515]

>>18090422
Explain

[Anonymous No.18100589]

>>18100498
that would be nice and what is MAM. been out of the loop of trackers since what.cd got killed

[Anonymous No.18100884]

our guy

[Anonymous No.18101515]

>>18090422
Spengler wasn't a fascist, retard.

[Anonymous No.18101737]

>>18101515

Why would you think that? He sent both Hitler and Mussolini his book and congratulated them on their electoral victory. Fascism is of course tough to define but there certainly seems to be an ideological closeness to Spengler.

[Anonymous No.18101896]

Have you ever seen that episode of Spongebob where Squidward hits himself in the face with a door and becomes more handsome?

Spengler looks like that if Aliester Crowley were Squidward

[Anonymous No.18101982]

>>18097399
>It's right in principle, but in this context the genderless term "people" would prevent misinterpretating "men" as "males"
Do you spend a lot of time around intellectuals?

[Anonymous No.18101991]

>>18099556
Good post.

[Anonymous No.18102058]

>>18101737
There is such a thing as having sympathies for people with whose ideas you only agree in part.

[Anonymous No.18102098]

>>18101982

Depends on the definition. Around academics yes.

[Anonymous No.18102104]

>>18102058

Where does he fundamentally differ from Fascist thought in your opinion?

[Anonymous No.18102158]

>>18102098
>Around academics yes
I thought so.
>>18102104
It's not on me to point out the differences. It's on you to point out the similarities.
Other than that, my understanding is that Spengler was part of the Conservative Revolution, which was largely made up of men like Carl Schmitt and Ernst Junger who initially had high hopes for Adolf Hitler, just like Martin Heidegger did, but very quickly turned against him.
I haven't read much Spengler myself, but I recall reading somewhere that he writes extremely critically of both Hitler and National Socialism in his diaries by 1936.

[Anonymous No.18102505]

>>18102158
>It's not on me to point out the differences. It's on you to point out the similarities.

He was an anti-democratic and anti-parliamentarian, decisionistic nationalist hoping for a dictator to lead Germany. He wasn't a Hitlerist or Nationalsocialist, he even grew opposed to them, but surely we can agree on Nationalsocialism being just one variant of Fascism. Spengler always revered Mussolini and he stood in close contact with several Fascists like Gregor Strasser and shared a lot of their political beliefs.
I'm not the one who initially wrote Spengler held Fascist views, but it nonetheless seems correct to me, that's why I was surprised to see your brusque objection.

>Other than that, my understanding is that Spengler was part of the Conservative Revolution, which was largely made up of men like Carl Schmitt and Ernst Junger who initially had high hopes for Adolf Hitler, just like Martin Heidegger did, but very quickly turned against him.

I somewhat agree on Jünger turning against Hitler, but I don't see how Schmitt turned against him at all. Also saying Heidegger did seems like a stretch to me.

[Anonymous No.18102555]

>>18102505
>He was an anti-democratic and anti-parliamentarian, decisionistic nationalist hoping for a dictator to lead Germany.
This alone does not fascism make.
>Spengler always revered Mussolini and he stood in close contact with several Fascists like Gregor Strasser and shared a lot of their political beliefs.
So what? This applies equally to Evola, who was a reactionary, not a fascist. If you have any doubts about that, look into his Fascism Viewed From the Right.
>but I don't see how Schmitt turned against him at all.
I mentioned Schmitt because he was part of the Conservative Revolution, but my understanding is that he never really supported him. I am strongly considering learning German just so I can read more of his work, by the way, but I am not sure if I should.
>Also saying Heidegger did seems like a stretch to me.
We had a thread about this the other day with quotes from the man himself and at least one biography on him, if I remember correctly. I will see if I can dig it up soon, but it is incontrovertible that he initially supported Hitler but was later disappointed.

[Anonymous No.18102635]

>>18102555
>>18102505
Concerning Heidegger: I mixed up a number of things.
First, I found the thread, but it was nothing. Someone claimed that he wrote in a postwar letter that he has no reason to apologize, because Hitler disappointed him. Here's the link: >>/lit/thread/S18043994#p18044177
Second, my view of Heidegger comes from Michael Gillespie's essay on him in the third edition of Leo Strauss's famous History of Political Philosophy. Here is the relevant quotation, from pages 895 to 896.
"Heidegger became involved with the Nazis during the early 1930s at Freiburg University. In the midst of the revolution that followed Hitler's rise to power, Heidegger was asked by his colleagues to become rector of the university in order to help preserve its independence. He hoped for more than this, however, and believed that the Nazi revolution could be directed toward a more fundamental experience of human existence that could serve as the basis for a more authentic ethics and politics. In this scheme for reform and redirection, the German university in Heidegger's view would have to play a leading role and give the political movement an intellectual substance that it hitherto had lacked. Such a fundamental refounding of German life thus presupposed a refounding of the German university. It was this that Heidegger thought he might effect. The decidedly un-Nazi title of his inaugural address as rector, 'The Self-Assertion of the German University,' reflects such an aspiration.
"Heidegger's hopes soon revealed themselves as illusions. He found himself at odds with the Nazis as a result of his resistance to the Nazification of the university and his unwillingness to dismiss Jewish faculty members, and his attempts at compromise failed to satisfy the authorities. Nor were these Heidegger's only difficulties, for the positive forces in the German university that he had hoped to unite behind him resisted his attempts at reform. His hopes for a political transformation on the basis of an antecedent academic transformation thus were shattered. Confronted with Nazi demands he was unwilling to fulfill and faculty intransigence he could not overcome, he resigned. As a result, he was viewed with growing suspicion by the regime and subjected during the rest of the Nazi period to a variety of punitive measures including surveillance of his seminars and forced labor on military fortifications.
"Whatever his aversion to Nazism, Heidegger apparently also saw something positive in it, for in 1935 he spoke of 'the inner truth and greatness of this movement' in his lectures on the 'Introduction to Metaphysics' and included this passage when they were published in 1953. Does this mean that Heidegger was a Nazi? Heidegger tried to defend himself against this charge in two ways. First, he argued that to alter the text would be a historical falsification. Indeed, this would have left him open to the charge that he was trying to conceal his Nazi past.

[Anonymous No.18102657]

>>18102635
(cont.) Second, he drew attention in the 1960s to a parenthetical gloss on the offending passage, which ran '(namely the encounter between world technology and modern man).' It was Heidegger's contention that his serious audience understood him correctly in 1935 while the stupid and suspicious interpreted the passage to their own satisfaction as a sign of his affection for the regime. All intricacies of fact and speculation aside, it remains incontrovertible that Heidegger never publicly repudiated his Nazi utterances.
"That said, what does this gloss tell us about Heidegger's understanding of Nazism? Modern man, as Heidegger understands him, is fundamentally bound up with technology. As Ernst Junger, in Heidegger's view, had insightfully shown in his book The Worker, the model for man's Being in the contemporary technological world is the worker. It was apparently the attempt of the Nazis to give a new meaning to man as worker that Heidegger admired and that he believed offered a possibility for a new and more authentic ethics and politics, although how this might be achieved he never made clear. He recognized that those in power were too unskilled in thinking to come to grips with technology in an adequate way but believed they might listen to those capable of thinking more profoundly. Here he was clearly wrong and failed to appreciate the dedication of the leaders of the Nazi movement to an ideology of genocide and apocalypse."

[Anonymous No.18102658]

>>18102505
>He was an anti-democratic and anti-parliamentarian, decisionistic nationalist hoping for a dictator to lead Germany.
Pretty based. Why are you such a fag to oppose it?

[Anonymous No.18103196]

>>18102555
>This alone does not fascism make.

Doesn't it at least overlap even with very narrow definitions of Fascism? Keep in mind the post you originally replied to was talking broadly about "holding fascistic views". How would you define Fascism?

>This applies equally to Evola, who was a reactionary, not a fascist. If you have any doubts about that, look into his Fascism Viewed From the Right.

I am not sure about the significance of such self-assessments in terms of reaching meaningful, objective classifications, especially when those assessments were written or proclaimed after Fascist rule had ended.
I am not too familiar with Evola, but some of his views make me wonder if the political realities he wishes to return to as a reactionary actually ever existed outside of his own mind. In this sense the mere term "reactionary" strikes me as unsatisfactory to label him.
Speaking of Evola, do you maybe have a book rec concerning his after war trial?

>I mentioned Schmitt because he was part of the Conservative Revolution, but my understanding is that he never really supported him.

(Once Hitler gained power) Schmitt was relentless and absolutely unambiguous in supporting him and NS-rule most notably by legitimizing it legally.

By the way aren't pretty much all of his works translated yet?

>>18102635

Interesting, thanks. Concerning Heidegger's stance during Nazi rule one can also consult his diaries of that time, which were released only about 6 years ago and seem to have been overlooked by some.

>>18102658

I never said anything about my political beliefs. Although I would oppose it out of pity for the bereaved having to sweep up the shards again.

[Anonymous No.18103258]

>>18103196
>I never said anything about my political beliefs.
Pretty sure you said it here >>18090422, if it isn't you, I apologize.
>Although I would oppose it out of pity for the bereaved having to sweep up the shards again.
Sorry, what did you mean by this?

[Anonymous No.18103306]

>>18103196
>Doesn't it at least overlap even with very narrow definitions of Fascism?
I don't think so, since the labels you used could just as easily describe a follower of Thomas Hobbes.
>I am not sure about the significance of such self-assessments in terms of reaching meaningful, objective classifications, especially when those assessments were written or proclaimed after Fascist rule had ended.
I am not talking about his "suprafascista" comment. I am talking about his assessment of Italian Fascism in Fascism Viewed From the Right, which is a relatively brief document and can be found for free online. I haven't finished reading it, but the following quotation from the second chapter should make my point clear:
"Even in looking for positive elements in Fascism, there is an essential difference between two different positions. On the one hand, there are those who take Fascism for their one and only reference point, and make their own political, historical and doctrinal horizon begin and end with Fascism (as well as analogous movements in other countries - German National Socialism, Belgian Rexism, the early Spanish Falange, Salazar's regime in Portugal, and the Rumanian Iron Guard; it was only the other day that one could speak of a 'worldwide revolution' as of a general movement in opposition to the proletarian revolution). On the other hand, there are those who consider what was present in these movements in terms of particular forms that were more or less imperfect and adapted to circumstances, but in which ideas and principles of that earlier tradition of which we have spoken were manifested and active. (In these ideas and principles we should recognize a character of 'normality' and consistency). These people lead these movements' original aspects, which are 'revolutionary' in the strict sense, back into the domain of the secondary and contingent. In brief, it is a questioning of reconnecting Fascism wherever possible with the great European political tradition, and to separate out that which existed in it only because of compromise, of divergent and absolutely deviant possibilities, and of phenomena that in part suffered from the same evils it was reacting against and attempting to combat."
He was essentially an outsider who thought that he could push Fascism in a reactionary direction.
>I am not too familiar with Evola, but some of his views make me wonder if the political realities he wishes to return to as a reactionary actually ever existed outside of his own mind.
This is a good point, but I think it applies to everyone with political ideas.
>In this sense the mere term "reactionary" strikes me as unsatisfactory to label him.
I would agree, if only because his notion of "Tradition" could not have existed in pre-Enlightenment Europe, and would likely have resulted in his being branded a heretic.
>Speaking of Evola, do you maybe have a book rec concerning his after war trial?
No.

[Anonymous No.18103349]

>>18103196
>>18103306
>(Once Hitler gained power) Schmitt was relentless and absolutely unambiguous in supporting him and NS-rule most notably by legitimizing it legally.
That doesn't sound right to me, particularly considering how he was denounced by partisans of the regime for being too Hegelian, if I remember correctly. The biggest stumbling block to the idea of Schmitt as a fascist is the fact that he tried to get the Nazi Party banned before they came to power and made no attempts to justify them or their order after the war ended.
>By the way aren't pretty much all of his works translated yet?
I don't think so. His diaries, in particular, have not yet been translated. Speaking of his diaries, here's the first thing that comes up when I search for them in English:
The Oxford Handbook of Carl Schmitt (The site won't let me post the link)
Schmitt's Diaries
>Among other significant insights, the chapter argues, Schmitt did not seek to undermine Weimar or realize his theories in the “Third Reich.”

[Anonymous No.18104305]

Up

[Anonymous No.18104806]

>>18101896
Kek

[Anonymous No.18104822]

>>18092946
If you publish the translations I will read them

[Anonymous No.18104841]

>>18101737
He also didn't vote for Hitler. Every world leader congratulated Biden when he won. Doesn't mean every world leader is a Democrat

[Anonymous No.18104863]

>>18090055
Jack Parsons identified four obstacles that prevented humans from achieving and performing their
True Will, all of which he connected with fear: the fear of incompetence, the fear of the opinion of others,
the fear of hurting others, and the fear of insecurity. He insisted that these must be overcome, writing that
"The Will must be freed of its fetters. The ruthless examination and destruction of taboos, complexes, frustrations,
dislikes, fears and disgusts hostile to the Will is essential to progress

[Anonymous No.18104874]

>>18092946
>These "diaries" aren't a joy to read, but it's nonetheless fascinating and touching to learn about these human and sensitive traits of his.
>I started to translate these fragments here and there but I don't know if a lot of people would be interested in reading them. They don't make for these sort of vitalizing infusions of a lot of readers of his seem to be out for.

just publish a book, call it The Spengler Diaries or something like that

[Anonymous No.18105161]

>>18090055
you dont. knwo what you are taokihg BOUT

[Anonymous No.18105703]

>>18090055
correct. if he was a real German, he would've fought in the war

[Anonymous No.18106114]

>>18105703
They didn't want him since he had a heavy heart defect that also lead to his premature death.

[Anonymous No.18106139]

>>18092633
Here.
magnet:?xt=urn:btih:94284828292f65f3dfd0f7d7b7e0a76012ec1f79&dn=The%20Decline%20of%20the%20West%20-%20Vol%201%3A%20Form%20and%20Actuality.%20Vol%202%3A%20Perspectives%20of%20World%20History%20%20-%20%20Oswald%20Spengler&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.coppersurfer.tk%3A6969&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.leechers-paradise.org%3A6969&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.torrent.eu.org%3A451%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.open-internet.nl%3A6969%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.opentrackr.org%3A69691337%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.vanitycore.co%3A6969%2Fannounce&tr=http%3A%2F%2Ftracker.baravik.org%3A6970%2Fannounce&tr=http%3A%2F%2Fretracker.telecom.by%3A80%2Fannounce&tr=http%3A%2F%2Ftracker.vanitycore.co%3A6969%2Fannounce
>>18100589
MAM is a book and audiobook tracker. Fairly EZ-Modo (I'm not very high on my private-tracker-fu). They don't have absolutely everything and quality control in the audiobook section can get a bit messy but it's worth a signup.

[Anonymous No.18106185]

>>18104863
Fear of incompetence seems like a special case of the fear of others' opinions, or of hurting others. I can't think of an independent example.

[Anonymous No.18106248]

>>18102505
I dislike chuds as much as anyone in this board, but going by your definition then Lenin, Stalin, Mao and so on would be fascists too. You may like them or not, but it would be ridiculous to call any of them a fascist. If anything they were the original antifa (anti fascists).

[Anonymous No.18106886]

>>18090055
If the average leftist had no fear, they would all crush us in an instant.

[Anonymous No.18106915]

> kike is scared
paint me shocked

[Anonymous No.18107151]

>>18106886
A part of being a lefty is to be scared of boogyman

[Anonymous No.18107161]

>>18090055
Anyone who of this day and age ISN'T scared of the future is just living entirely in the present like a zombie or coping.

[Anonymous No.18107181]

I used to be afraid of sleep itself. Beat that. Now I'm afraid of sleep paralysis. In the process of conquering that fear as well.

I can literally feel myself growing stronger mentally with each passing new year of suffering. That's what I get for more than a decade of living life like a sloth.

It's funny because in the last 2 years my view has radically shifted - I used to think eternal suffering was preferable to nonexistence when I was afraid of sleep itself, now I can say I would prefer oblivion to eternal suffering while dealing with sleep paralysis fear.

The funny part is I haven't experienced sleep paralysis even once. In my 30 years I have never experienced it, and even in the last few months with my anxiety shot through the roof it didn't come. It likely will never come, and is some kind of rarely understood neurological disorder affecting a small percentage of the population. Even so, it's entirely harmless and the reality is that you simply close your eyes and nudge your muscles awake for 15-30 seconds until they also wake up. Everything else to it is nonsense conjecture.

[Anonymous No.18107221]

>>18107181
um...

[Anonymous No.18107258]

>>18107221
Did I unnerve you, boy?

[Anonymous No.18107267]

Spengler wasn't a fascist or Nazi. He was a conservative Right Hegelian with a boner for the Prussian aristocracy (similar to Hegel himself?). Prussianboos were famously contemptuous of Nazis and tried to assassinate Hitler a couple times. One of Uncle Spenk's books got banned by the Nazis and I think that's why he gave up writing his last book. His predictions for the future of the West gradually turned him off politics. He predicted Caesarism (populist rule by generals and millionaires through personality cults) and wasn't happy about seeing Trump in his crystal ball. You can separate his politics from his theory, too, and even consider his theory in a more Young Hegelian light, which is basically what Cultural Relativism has done for the past century, in much the same way Postmodernists overlook Heidegger's NSDAP pin.

[Anonymous No.18107293]

>>18107258
somewhat...
why sleep paralysis of all things to be scared of?

[Anonymous No.18107329]

>>18107293
I think the fear of sleep was predated by an intense fear of death in 2018, which was predated by a base fear of losing control in general. It's all connected.

My fear of sleep was based on me thinking like I'd be falling into a deep pit of void and losing my sense of "self" as I slept, fade to black, etc. My fear of sleep paralysis is the fear that I'd lose bodily function for a bit.

The thing about anxiety is that once you experience an intense anxiety-based fear, it literally changes you physically. You trigger the fight-or-flight mechanism and it the anxiety causes it to remain in you for a prolonged period of time, so you start living life for weeks in survival mode and your thoughts center around that. One of the crazy things about psychological issues is that they can easily cause chemical changes in you as well, and those remain inside you for months possibly even years.

So even after some time where you feel like you'd "solved" your fear rationally, you still return again and again to having negative thoughts despite thinking you are over it. However your brain isn't, and the chemical imbalance caused by that spike in anxiety is continuing to fuck you up months later. It's a gradual process of basically detoxifying yourself through psychotherapy and physical supplementation like a good diet, sleep hygiene, and even drugs. I take something called adaptogens like Ashwagadnha which have the purpose of lowering your cortisol levels in your body and regulating them - the literal stress hormone.

It's a pretty exhausting and frustrating thing to have to deal with. The desire to "just be normal again" can be intense sometimes and you feel like you're incredibly impatient and want to go back to how things were. But hey, I'm clearly fucked up in many ways and if it took a decade+ of degradation to reach this point, it also logically stands that it will take many years to unfuck myself and climb out of my hole.

[Anonymous No.18107846]

>>18106139
thank you

[Anonymous No.18107919]

>>18107329
I wish you the best anon
I'm at a loss of words

[Anonymous No.18107937]

>>18090422
Pic related >>18093703 was italo Balbo, one of the manliest chad to ever live, and Mussolini's planned successor at the lead of the party, before his death on a plane crash in 1940

[Anonymous No.18108108]

>>18107919
no worries, it's not that bad
there are far worse things in the world you can suffer through like terminal cancer

[Anonymous No.18108300]

>>18107181
I had sleep paralysis once 10 years ago.
Its not pretty

[Anonymous No.18108529]

>>18108300
it is also generally what you make of it
its worse for others especially those spiritually inclined

[Anonymous No.18109705]

bump

[Anonymous No.18109842]

>>18102104
Where does he fundamentally agree with Fascist thought in your opinion?

[Anonymous No.18109858]

>>18102505
There is no proto-fascism that everything is a variant of. Meaningless piggy-backing off your emotional investment in the term. There is Fascism, which is Italian, there is Nazism which is German. If you want more you've got to work for it or start defining almost everyone as a Fascist.

[Anonymous No.18110891]

The Hour of Decision > Decline of the West
not even close desu

[Anonymous No.18112385]

bump

[Anonymous No.18112575]

>>18107181
I get sleep paralysis like 10 times a year. You get used to it and start realizing you're paralyzed and the cat and shadows aren't real and don't give a fuck desu
First few times though, scariest shit ever.

[Anonymous No.18112829]

I had sleep paralysis for the first time a few days ago (didn't realise what it was at the time).

I didn't feel fear or hallucinate, I was just like wtf I can't move. Ended up trying to wiggle my toes for a period of time to see if that would help return movement to my body and it did. Only later did I find out that I suffered from and apparently you're supposed to try and move small muscles to get out of it so I suppose wiggling my toes actually worked.

[Anonymous No.18112851]

>>18112829
Wait till the Exploding Head Syndrome kicks in. That's when the real fun starts.

[Anonymous No.18112945]

>>18092646
This. Taqwa is the most important Attribute one can have. Fear of god or awareness of God for politcial correct people.

[Anonymous No.18112952]

>>18090055
we're all afraid, only are willing to understand this