/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.18029624]

>There is no distinction between Science and pseudoscience
Is he right?

[Anonymous No.18029721]

>>18029624
Let´s do a poll with 10 people and find out.

[Anonymous No.18029729]

>>18029624
Let's do a poll with 10 chickens and find out.

[Anonymous No.18029733]

Then try to get a rocket to the moon with prayer

[Anonymous No.18029772]

>there is no difference between knowledge and belief
Is he right?

[Anonymous No.18029934]

>>18029772
where did plato say this? his idea of forms should insert the idea that source of knowledge is, in fact, forms themselves, no?

[Anonymous No.18029940]

>>18029624
Yes.

[Anonymous No.18029945]

>>18029934
Theaetetus, 201 c-d
"Knowledge is true belief based on argument. "

[Anonymous No.18029962]

The only thing I got from this book was that Galileo was indeed a retard.

[Anonymous No.18029982]

>>18029624
Glad to see that my periodic shilling ofbmy boi Feyerabend is finally bearing fruit. To answer you, let me start by saying the terminology and distinction is shit, clearly you haven't read the book, but the point is, as a methodology, there's nothing about so-called science or the scientific method that makes it inherently better as a method of obtaining truth. Read the book

[Anonymous No.18030273]

>>18029982
This

[Anonymous No.18030888]

>>18029624
yes

[Anonymous No.18030896]

>>18029772
Yes.

[Anonymous No.18031805]

power decides whats "pseud-"

[Anonymous No.18031840]

It depends on the authority of something. If it's entertained by academics and put in textbooks, it's legitimate. So yes it's mostly meaningless.

[Anonymous No.18033260]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hM83cBa9wDM