/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.18007108]

Are there any books that argue against philosophy?

[Anonymous No.18007110]

>>18007108
Deleuze & Guattari.

[Anonymous No.18007118]

>>18007110
Which one of their books? All of them?

[Anonymous No.18007132]

>>18007108
Colossians, bible

[Anonymous No.18007312]

>>18007108
F Engels & K Marx (1845) Theses on Feuerbach.

[Anonymous No.18007322]

>>18007108
Neo-reactionaries are against thinking in general - so yes

[Anonymous No.18007333]

>>18007108
Van til was a retard so him.

[Anonymous No.18007371]

>>18007322
there's a world of difference between mathematical-scientific thinking and speculative-philosophical thinking that reigns supreme in philosophy departments of major universities. neo-reactionaries champion the former (the most popular ones are scientists and STEMfags themselves) and reject the latter

[Anonymous No.18007446]

What's wrong with reading the penguin classic version of philosophy books, they make it easier to understand.

[Anonymous No.18007541]

>>18007108
A short history of decay >>18006936

[Anonymous No.18007555]

>>18007322
>me want to sit all day and think about unanswerable questions because it makes me feel smaht
This is why no one takes philosophers seriously. Philosophy has led to the destruction of the world as we know it.

[Anonymous No.18008421]

>>18007108
Ludwig Klages - Of Cosmogonic Eros

[Anonymous No.18008474]

>>18007108
Nietzsche basically does

[Anonymous No.18008476]

>>18007108
Those who think philosophy is a waste of times are the slaves and goat herders of today.

[Anonymous No.18008513]

How would you argue against something that isn't even a position or a claim? It's like arguing against walking. Or against thinking. Or against a rock.

[Anonymous No.18008541]

I really hate Kant. Is there anyone who shat on that faggot? Everyone seems to think he's the bees knees

[Anonymous No.18008570]

>>18008541
nietzsche calls him cant

[Anonymous No.18008573]

I've been reading Gilson lately and he's mentioned Comte in a couple of books. I'm not really familiar with Comte himself other than that he was a major proponent of Positivism which he said would end metaphysics for good. Considering that the only people I see who really seethe about philosophy are more science oriented people who cite Positivism, it would appear to me that Comte's legacy is one of anti philosophy.

Gilson also mentions "Discourse to the Greeks" and "Derision of the Philosophers" as early Christian polemics against Philosophy

[Anonymous No.18008582]

Every philosopher argues against philosophy(of other philosophers).

Every work starts off like: "Philosopher x said a lot of great things...truly a lot of great things. But let me tell you why it's all bullshit..."

[Anonymous No.18008584]

>>18008474
http://www.hunter.cuny.edu/jns/research/philosophizing-against-philosophy-nietzsche2019s-provocation-of-the-philosophical-tradition

[Anonymous No.18008615]

>>18008541

[Anonymous No.18008630]

>>18007108
To argue against philosophy is already philosophy, so basically every philosoph.

[Anonymous No.18008654]

>>18007555
stfu commie

[Anonymous No.18008662]

>>18008541
Frege, Spengler, Einstein, me,

[Anonymous No.18008672]

>>18007555
You literally cannot conceive of a world that hasn't been under some sort of philosophical sway, because philosophical pursuits are intrinsic to what makes human beings what we are. This is aside from any trends within the academy. Any world you think is ruined by philosophy was itself philosophical.

>>18008513
This. Raging against philosophy is the sign of someone who hates thinking so much that they don't even want other people to do it.

[Anonymous No.18008681]

>>18007108
sextus empiricus Adversus Mathematicos

[Anonymous No.18008771]

>>18008662

[Anonymous No.18008774]

>>18008672
Most people just dont know what philosophy is. They think it's like some artsy fartsy shit where you just write about your feelings. A slightly more nuanced person thinks it's just primitive science. I think the real problem in our society is a lack of philosophy

[Anonymous No.18008786]

>>18008774
>I think the real problem in our society is a lack of philosophy
Imagine unironically thinking this

[Anonymous No.18008824]

>>18008786
In what part of society is philosophy oversaturated?

[Anonymous No.18008970]

>>18008662
>Einstein
I don't get this meme. Doesn't relativity actually help prove that Kant was right?

[Anonymous No.18008999]

>>18008970
A lot of people argue that it proves Kant wrong since it posits that the phenomenal universe operates according to non euclidean geometry

[Anonymous No.18009103]

>>18008786
>The most thought-provoking thing in our thought-provoking time is that we are still not thinking.

[Anonymous No.18009116]

>>18008999
Neo-kantianism tried to solve that problem.

[Anonymous No.18009163]

>>18008970
>Doesn't relativity actually help prove that Kant was right?
lol what? are you retarded or just pretending to be? Relativity literally proves that everything Kant said about time was complete and utter bullshit.

>>18009116
Whom?

[Anonymous No.18009221]

>>18009103

[Anonymous No.18009882]

>>18007108
Several.

[Anonymous No.18009914]

>>18007108
>argue against philosophy
Nice philosophy, nerd.

[Anonymous No.18010563]

>>18009882
Zum beispiel?

[Anonymous No.18010598]

>>18007555
You’re gay and you like penis

[Anonymous No.18010609]

>>18008774
Well, it’s simply that philosophy is dead because it’s spread too thin into various sciences. Bound to collapse imo. You can’t have society specialize into infinity.

[Anonymous No.18010639]

>>18007108
Jacobi - Doctrine of Spinoza, Letters to Herr Moses Mendelssohn, Jacobi to Fichte in 'Main Philosophical Writings and the Novel Allwill

[Anonymous No.18010657]

Philosophy is learning to think properly.
You're right, in so far as it isn't needed in society today, just consume product, yell at spectacle and become part of the specialized and alienated work force.

[Anonymous No.18010959]

>>18007108
Ecclesiastes kind of

[Anonymous No.18011145]

Read Feynman
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X8aWBcPVPMo

[Anonymous No.18011157]

Its literally this meme. Philosophers why say why x philosophy is wrong and in doing so they are just making another philosophical system. There is no way to refute philosophy without doing philosophy