/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.17986967]

Ok, I’ve included some books to the chart but now I think it’s time to either create a reading order or at least organize the books into rankings (entry-level to schizocomplexity tier). Any suggestions? I also want to include some Lefebvre and Kierkeegaard, what do you guys rec?

[Anonymous No.17987023]

>>17986967
First step is to separate the fiction from the non fiction, Huxley -> white noise -> infinite jest

As far as entry level texts I know for a fact amusing ourselves to death and capitalist realism are ezpz. I think manufacturing consent is easy too, it’s just longer and dryer.

All the postmodernist deconstructivist stuff should be in a separate category too: zizek baudillard deluze etc.

There are also a few books that should be added that I can’t remember all of right now, but the one that blew my mind the most recently was 5000 years of debt. Completely shifted the way I see society.

[Anonymous No.17988219]

>>17987023
I love Graeber but I don’t see how he’s relevant to the Blindpill chart. But separating fiction from non-fiction is probably a great idea.

I think Mumford Lewis could be a good addition to the chart, though.

[Anonymous No.17988840]

>>17988219
Maybe bullshit jobs is a better choice by graeber. If it’s about uncovering the veil of meaningless simulation.

[Anonymous No.17989008]

Just get rid of fiction altogether

[Anonymous No.17989761]

What happened to the text?

[Anonymous No.17990150]

what is the blind pill?

[Anonymous No.17990196]

>though

[Anonymous No.17990262]

>>17986967
While I do like the additional books, you cut off the cool text.

[Anonymous No.17991982]

bump what is the blind pill

[Anonymous No.17993712]

>>17991982
No screens 4 u