OHNONONONON WE GOT TOO COCKY POSTMODERN BROS

[Anonymous No.17890172]

>A fellow intellectual, Guy Sorman, has unleashed a storm among Parisian “intellos” with his claim that Foucault, who died in 1984 aged 57, was a paedophile rapist who had sex with Arab children while living in Tunisia in the late 1960s.
>Sorman, 77, said he had visited Foucault with a group of friends on an Easter holiday trip to the village of Sidi Bou Said, near Tunis, where the philosopher was living in 1969. “Young children were running after Foucault saying ‘what about me? take me, take me’,” he recalled last week in an interview with The Sunday Times.

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/french-philosopher-michel-foucault-abused-boys-in-tunisia-6t5sj7jvw

[Anonymous No.17890176]

everyone already knew he was a pedo newfag

[Anonymous No.17890185]

>>17890176
cope, the petition didnt intimate that he was raping kids. he literally COLONIZED those nubile arab bodies.

[Anonymous No.17890194]

>>17890172
>Young children were running after Foucault saying ‘what about me? take me, take me'
wtf

[Anonymous No.17890201]

>>17890172
>Frenchman is a degenerate coomer
color me surprised

[Anonymous No.17890203]

What's the problem here? I thought you guys were against cancel culture?

[Anonymous No.17890211]

>>17890172
>>17890185
As bad as the petition was, I always assumed it to be the result of naive acceptance which would dissipate upon confrontation with the actual fact. I should have known better than to give this faggot the benefit of the doubt. At least I still have Derrida wouldn't have actually gone through with supporting pedo shit had he seen it.

[Anonymous No.17890214]

>>17890172
>Young children were running after Foucault saying ‘what about me? take me, take me
Hot af

[Anonymous No.17890215]

>>17890203
Leftists can't get cancelled, bro. No matter how bad they are.

[Anonymous No.17890216]

>>17890211
You'll never learn retard

[Anonymous No.17890217]

>>17890201
Hi

[Anonymous No.17890221]

>>17890203
What the fuck are you talking about? Stop forcing the terms of our whimful ages down every throat.

[Anonymous No.17890224]

>>17890203
Wrong retard. Everyone here wants as many people as possible to get cancelled as fast as possible.

[Anonymous No.17890230]

>>17890216
Derrida was a very good man, his support of pedophillia can only be considered a mistake, there is no doubt. Had he seen Foucault's harem he would have punched the bald bastard in the face.

[Anonymous No.17890233]

Baudrillard remains undefeated

[Anonymous No.17890234]

>de man turned out to be a nazi collaborator
>foucault turned to be a pedophile
Which pomo hack is going to be next?

[Anonymous No.17890237]

>>17890230
Ok retard

[Anonymous No.17890244]

>>17890203
the average twitter cancel crowd doesnt even know who this guy is, just another dead white male

[Anonymous No.17890249]

>>17890172
>>17890185
>BAGUETTED
Wtf I love pomo now

[Anonymous No.17890250]

>>17890244
Yes they do lol universities always teach about this pedophile

[Anonymous No.17890252]

>>17890172
you do know that atheism is the glorification fo sex and atheists are okay with merging sex with entertainment, politics and education. The americans had porn whore as first lady, the germans has a nudist as president, various political females have sex tapes. All jewlywood is pedophilic.

you know this is encouraged right.

[Anonymous No.17890269]

The "colonization" undercurrent of Foucault's pedophile activities is amusing to me insofar as many American or Americanized "PoC intellectuals" allowed themselves to be mentally colonized by a pedo Frenchman... into saying the exact sorts of things the US wanted them to.

[Anonymous No.17890272]

Bros....

I'm so fucking jealous.

[Anonymous No.17890292]

APOLOGIZE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NBFSDd_5tiE

[Anonymous No.17890299]

>>17890292
petersonchads.... i kneel...

[Anonymous No.17890301]

>>17890172
The couple of works of his that I own will fit nicely between my old copies of Mein Kampf and Das Kapital on my hidden shelf.

[Anonymous No.17890304]

>>17890172
>implying anyone thought he wasn't a kiddy diddler

[Anonymous No.17890318]

>>17890172
I thought everyone already knew this. Didn’t he sign a petition against the age of consent with a bunch of other French pseuds? Watch that Derrick Jensen talk.

[Anonymous No.17890324]

>you must respect other countries' culture and traditions
>but not when is about prostitution and sex
Explain this

[Anonymous No.17890325]

>>17890172
>>17890176
>>17890201
>>17890216
>>17890234
>>17890237
>>17890244
>>17890252
>>17890269
>>17890304
He’s only an alleged pedophile. Stop jumping to conclusions.

[Anonymous No.17890333]

>>17890176
the millenial journo class only just found out, so it's hitting twitter as we speak, and leaking back into our hidey hole here.

[Anonymous No.17890334]

>>17890325
He signed a petition to legalize pedophilia

[Anonymous No.17890345]

>>17890334
That doesn’t make him a pedo.

[Anonymous No.17890349]

>>17890333
Link to twitter reactions? I don't know how to use it and I want to see r*dditors damage control

[Anonymous No.17890360]

>tfw many important figures of our "post-war left-wing moral consensus" are/were pedos, rapists, murderers, etc.
Hmm..

[Anonymous No.17890385]

>>17890360

[Anonymous No.17890387]

>>17890172
>‘what about me? take me, take me’
thats consent bro

[Anonymous No.17890400]

If you thought this was good, imagine the shitstorm when the US declassifies all the documents on Martin Luther King.

[Anonymous No.17890403]

Guys the petition was bad, his writing alludes to him thinking a man paying little girls to jerk him off isn't a big deal.. but if this is true?
Bros was Foucault a pedo hack? Was Sartre also a pedo hack and sexual abuser?
WHY ARE FROGS LIKE THIS

[Anonymous No.17890410]

>French
>Not a dgenerate subhuman scum
Pick one.

[Anonymous No.17890414]

>>17890325
One of his friends snitched a few weeks ago on French TV. He was a pedo and he’s rotting in hell.

[Anonymous No.17890420]

>>17890349
i havent really read to see if theres any funny material here, but these are some top results from the search "foucault tunisia"

https://twitter.com/MrAndyNgo/status/1376180594825162753
https://twitter.com/KyleWOrton/status/1376206122663739392
https://twitter.com/LozzaFox/status/1376151389156544514
https://twitter.com/johndurant/status/1376213027175956484
https://twitter.com/_amroali/status/1376188444859375618
https://twitter.com/DrPJWilliams/status/1376200753237389316

[Anonymous No.17890421]

>>17890172
>projecting abuse of power
yeah, we knew

[Anonymous No.17890450]

>>17890403
coomer nation

[Anonymous No.17890456]

>>17890400
w-what documents?

[Anonymous No.17890457]

>>17890325
he was a french fag who lived thru the 50's 60's he was fucking kids.

[Anonymous No.17890486]

>>17890456
iirc there's a bunch of stuff still classified from when the FBI had King under surveillance, most importantly that he was probably a rapist. I think they are to be declassified in 2027.

[Anonymous No.17890515]

>>17890252
BASED

[Anonymous No.17890530]

>>17890203
i want to cancel your life

[Anonymous No.17890532]

>>17890420
I wonder how the redditors will take it.

[Anonymous No.17890549]

>>17890420
>even twitter knew

[Anonymous No.17890588]

>>17890486
>most importantly that he was probably a rapist.
If that was true it'd already be released. Big Gov wasn't a fan of the Civil Rights Movement and assassinated the leaders when they started to build labour movements.

[Anonymous No.17890597]

>>17890532
>>17890549
>Of course it was obvious. He has always been associated with right wing ways of thinking after all!

[Anonymous No.17890609]

>>17890588
>when they started to build labour movements.
Would the same happen today?

[Anonymous No.17890613]

The normies don't know it yet, but this is a heavy strike to the balance of politics. I think we're heading towards complete ideological collapse on both sides, any use of post-modernist talking point intellectual debates is now indefensible unless they also defend pedos, which the common man won't stand by. It won't be a fast process but things won't be the same next decade

[Anonymous No.17890617]

>>17890549
Based @scott_putnam

[Anonymous No.17890622]

>>17890609
No, because the “civil rights” leaders of today actively hate and attack anybody who dares suggest a struggle allied with labour. It’s like regulatory capture, but for “activist” organizations.

[Anonymous No.17890623]

>>17890588
"Big Government" ran the Civil Rights movement lel, the government viewed racial issues as a critical foreign policy matter that affected America's image in third-world countries, where the US and USSR were competing for influence. MLK himself was basically a pawn of the usual suspects in the nonprofit sector

[Anonymous No.17890646]

>>17890292
damn here's your
>(you)
seething

[Anonymous No.17890649]

>>17890622
so the labour movements ended in 60's in favor for social rights movements?

[Anonymous No.17890651]

>>17890203
>retarded christcuck thinks it's all about christianity vs atheism, us vs them shit
what a surprise

[Anonymous No.17890675]

So? Even if it were true, I don't really care.

[Anonymous No.17890694]

>>17890549
>anti-psychiatric
based

[Anonymous No.17890697]

>faggot Frenchman whose “morality” rests entirely on the dynamics of power and who continually sought out the most depraved sexual experiences as a way of understanding the the human experience turned out to be a pedophile
Wow, absolutely shocking

[Anonymous No.17890703]

>>17890649
It really ended in the late 70s and the 80s during the “counter-attack of capital” that established neoliberalism as the new dominant ideology of the first-world bourgeois.

[Anonymous No.17890901]

>>17890703
>counter-attack of capital
if only this was reality

[Anonymous No.17890925]

>>17890703
>neoliberalism as the new dominant ideology of the first-world bourgeois.
what is neoliberalism in this context?

[Anonymous No.17890933]

>teacher asks what I was reading
>tell her foucault's pendulum, but not who it was by
>hear her later on telling someone I was reading foucault
wonder if she thought I was a pedophile by proxy

[Anonymous No.17890944]

>>17890933
are his books about sexuality and prisons any good?

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » No.17890952]

all french are pedophiles so this surprises no one, but the fact that an anglo mi6 glowie rag is trying to push this is laughable since their country has the most nonces per square meter on earth

[Anonymous No.17890971]

>>17890944
i wouldn't know as I barely read foucault's pendulum to pretend eco is foucualt
something to do with being in the right place at the right time, I forget?

[Anonymous No.17890981]

>>17890703

Foucault himself was a neoliberal. His last lectures on govermentality is him "coming out" as pro libertarian.

I hate that faggot Frenchman so much.

[Anonymous No.17890987]

>>17890172
Well, he certainly looks like a child molester.

[Anonymous No.17891011]

>>17890249
Kek

[Anonymous No.17891031]

>this board goes from defending pedophiles to hating them based on whoever is the person being discussed

[Anonymous No.17891050]

why does it seem like every important philosopher has some kind of dark or twisted side that gets revealed every now and then?

[Anonymous No.17891055]

>>17891031
If they had sex with boys before 1900, that's based. If they had sex with boys after 1900, that's an indictment of modern degeneracy

[Anonymous No.17891059]

>>17891050
the brighter you are, the darker shadow you cast.

[Anonymous No.17891063]

>>17891050
What was Plato's darkness? Honestly, I can't think of anything.

[Anonymous No.17891075]

>>17891050
Foucault wasn’t a philosopher. I think he considered himself to be a “social historian” or something like that.

[Anonymous No.17891097]

>>17891063
he wrestled with and destroyed other men

[Anonymous No.17891099]

It's no surprise considering what an utter retard he was.

[Anonymous No.17891103]

>>17891075
I believe he came around to the idea near the end of his life, did he not?

[Anonymous No.17891144]

>>17891050
do philosophers really have this dark/twisted side you mentioned?
feel lots of them just went a bit crazy, but I wouldn't call that a twisted or dark side
fill me in

[Anonymous No.17891145]

>>17891103
It could be, what I was referencing was from his early writings or an Interview.

[Anonymous No.17891171]

>>17890269
true, it's why "POC intellectual" is just a complete oxymoron.

[Anonymous No.17891175]

>>17890925
In this context that would be a political and economic doctrine that was originally conceived in post-war Europe and later co-opted by US foreign policy makers in order to further their lousy globalist agenda.

[Anonymous No.17891182]

>>17891050
Because we're not like you.

[Anonymous No.17891193]

can I get an unpaywalled version of the article?

[Anonymous No.17891200]

Post your face when the entire postmodern, poststructuralist, and deconstructionist movement gets fucking canceled due to sex abuse issues.

The modern cultural Left is about to go full ouroboros. The snake is about to eat its own tail.

[Anonymous No.17891274]

I mean, the other main signatory of the petition was Sartre who is a documented pedophile (well ephebophile technically) so it's hardly suprising Foucault was also one.

[Anonymous No.17891466]

>>17890172
>Invents school of thought that is centred around justifying degeneracy.
>Practices degeneracy.
How could this happen?

[Anonymous No.17891484]

>>17891200
>anime people do not have distinct teeth
>they only have one large crescent disc

i'm shuddering, why would the japs do this

[Anonymous No.17891505]

You know I once heard a quote where Zizek called himself a pedophile, "like most men." At the time I thought it was the normal youtube ready shock comedy quip arguing that every red blooded man is a ephebophile deep down. But now...

[Anonymous No.17891509]

>>17890325
He literally advocated it in his writings. If anything this shouldn't be a surprise to anyone.

[Anonymous No.17891530]

>Michel Fuckall

[Anonymous No.17891568]

>When Foucault was in Tunisia in the late 1960s, he regularly raped boys aged roughly 8- to 10-years-old on the gravestones at a local cemetery, according to Guy Sorman, who met Foucault and saw him paying the children to arrange this.
kek

this is just a conservative boomer begging for attention, might as well say he did satanic rituals with them later

[Anonymous No.17891571]

oscar wilde did this too which somehow gets overlooked and him being unjustly exiled is all that's mentioned

[Anonymous No.17891587]

Name one bad thing that would result from banning humanities altogether.

[Anonymous No.17891592]

>>17890345
You know it does

[Anonymous No.17891607]

>>17891587
Massive unemployment of people probably too mush brained to do anything else

[Anonymous No.17891608]

>>17890400
nooooo not my favorite niggerino

[Anonymous No.17891612]

>>17891505
Can you find it?

Although Zizek only goes for women 30 years younger than him, so it's not impossible.

[Anonymous No.17891622]

>>17891568
>Guy Sorman

[Anonymous No.17891629]

The most surprising part about this thread is 4chan being anti pedo.

[Anonymous No.17891646]

>>17890269
>>17890252
>>17890360
>>17890400
>>17890403
>>17890613
>>17890623
>>17890697
>>17891200
>>17891505
god, can you imagine being this dumb

[Anonymous No.17891672]

>>17891607
They are already employed elsewhere, all it would do is clean the diploma mills from parasites. Can you imagine, these people have to write a dozen papers PER YEAR (original papers!) to remain employed - no wonder they invent nonsense, very few people have even one original thought developed within their lifetimes. It's all completely nonsensical and the reason why Foucault is the most cited scholar.

[Anonymous No.17891682]

so because someone does something bad we just ignore the cultural relevance and quality of the literature someone produced? by the same logic let's stop listening to bowie because he fucked a 14 year old. foucault is fucking smart and his writing isn't particularly if at all charged with left wing sentiment the vast majority of the time. in fact idea he birthed are parroted by you polfags all the time which you would know if you actually read him. i'm not saying what he wrote should be taken as true but books like madness and civilisation, archeology of knowledge etc are undeniably based and major works in social science, which you retards would know if you actually cared to open discipline and punish for example which is a relative page turner and can be finished in 2/3 days. i guess most of you brainlets would get filtered even by that book.

[Anonymous No.17891713]

>>17891682
is this your first time encountering american culture? but in any case, depravity tells a lot about the author, especially if he postures as a moral paragon (like bowie did from 80s forward). at least foucault put his signature where his stance lied.

[Anonymous No.17891729]

god, the tradlarping moralfag phase of the /lit/ is the worst

[Anonymous No.17891732]

>>17890194
>>17890172
they asked for it

[Anonymous No.17891741]

>>17890325
>>17890203
>>17890675
my fucking god...

Vid related to thread
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qNgDuvQkRwc

[Anonymous No.17891781]

>>17891713

Are you seriously comparing Bowie to Foucault . Bowie was a pop singer and a good soul as all who knew him attest, Foucault is the most cited author in humanites.Foucault was also accused to be a scummy careerist by many intellectuals even when he was alive. He did a whole speech on French unions to placate their demands. Deleuze also broke off from him when he started making excuses for Israels colonialist policies against Palestinians. Baudrillard called him out how he had become the darling of the management class.

He was just an asshole human being from the start, and everyone in France knew of it.

[Anonymous No.17891795]

>>17891781
>He was just an asshole human being
you're not on twitter, sweaty

[Anonymous No.17891798]

>>17891781
yes i am, he dated and fucked a 14 year old. cope. and who fucking cares if foucault was a shit person, none of these papers citing him are talking about how good he was as a human being, just his theories.

[Anonymous No.17891822]

>>17891795

The point though is that him being an asshole neo-liberal careerist faggot corroborates with his theory. Like with Heideggers nazi phase and all that talk about the "volk".

>>17891798

Its not cope, I am not simply putting a pop singer and the most cited person in humanities in the same pedastal.

[Anonymous No.17891839]

>>17891795
kek

[Anonymous No.17891865]

>>17891031
Poor attempt at deflection. This board isn't a monolith nor does it have dogma you need to pay lip service to.

[Anonymous No.17891867]

>>17890203
The left finally has it's Shane Gillis -- a pedophile frenchman that died of aids

[Anonymous No.17891901]

>>17891063
The allegory of the cave was actually a Richard Gere-esque gerbil scenario

[Anonymous No.17891919]

>>17890172
Why do the most outspoken people against racism, rape, and sexism turn out to be the most racist, creepy, and sexist behind closed doors? Has anyone else emotive this pattern?

[Anonymous No.17891947]

>>17891822
how could you not though. two guys who produced an extremely influential now canonical body of work?

[Anonymous No.17891957]

>>17890414
i mean, even without the pedophilia, he'd still be rotting in hell

[Anonymous No.17891960]

>>17891729
Seethe harder fag, every single important philosopher on your side of things is about to be purged from the universities by their own descendants.

[Anonymous No.17892016]

>>17891729
>tradlarping moralfags
the entire New Left are moralfags to the core.

[Anonymous No.17892083]

>>17891646
take your meds.

[Anonymous No.17892088]

>>17891646
being a pedophile/rapist undermines people who sought to undermine the justice system that condemned their crimes, yes. we already know MLK was a rapist.

[Anonymous No.17892173]

>>17890172
>is a faggot
>rapes children
wow who could have predicted this

[Anonymous No.17892314]

>>17890172
>abused
angloes are pathetic

[Anonymous No.17892352]

>>17890324
I hope your greentexting is supposed to reflect the current liberal world order's morality, and not Foucault.

[Anonymous No.17892357]

>pedos bad
social construction

[Anonymous No.17892366]

>Young children were running after Foucault saying ‘what about me? take me, take me
doesnt sound like rape to me
doesnt sound like rape to me

[Anonymous No.17892387]

>>17892357
when we create the gallows to hang all pedophiles, that will be the social construction

[Anonymous No.17892403]

>>17892314

The kids running after him asking for it is one anecdote. Another is his friend saying "consent... wasn't a question there" whatever that means.

[Anonymous No.17892406]

>>17891919
>the most outspoken people against racism, rape, and sexism
Foucault was none of those things

[Anonymous No.17892415]

>>17891960
It will only get worse, idiot

[Anonymous No.17892507]

>>17891729
when will it end?

[Anonymous No.17892537]

>>17891781
>the management class.
what is this?

[Anonymous No.17892548]

>>17892387
t. tradlarper moralfag

[Anonymous No.17892599]

>>17890172
it's all so tiresome. the machine dragging this out before anybody pretending like we haven't known all this time that they've known all this time. just yet another round of the cathedral purging its own.

[Anonymous No.17892614]

>>17891781
>Deleuze also broke off from him when he started making excuses for Israels colonialist policies against Palestinians. Baudrillard called him out how he had become the darling of the management class.
all frauds, all servants of power. who the fuck even gives a shit about these leftist power struggles within the party.

[Anonymous No.17892620]

>>17891798
>a man and his theories are totally separable!
Maybe if the man is producing mathematics or physics research.

A homosexual pedophile who died young due to the diseases/parasites he played host to as an insatiable anonymous-bathhouse-sodomy addict ought not be looked to for guidance in the humanities.
>who is to determine what mental illness is?
He turns the product of ages of civilization into a ridiculous black/white distinction and uses rhetoric to convince the reader that he is writing something profound rather than simply muddying the waters. In a vacuum he's correct! Which types of thought are to be declared "saner" if there is no reference to anything resembling the world? Brilliant!

No, it isn't. It is low-level sophistry that only managed to worm its way through universities because they had already been compromised by the Long March.

The products of this garbage substitute for rigorous thinking are making themselves clear. By every measure, western civilization has ceased to flourish and is, instead, dying. Dying in a malaise of emotional and spiritual emptiness. Just as that faggot Foucault died.

[Anonymous No.17892959]

>>17890944
Ye

[Anonymous No.17892974]

>>17891919
Foucault was a pervert mate, and if anything his work was always very sympathetic to people classified as degenerates.

[Anonymous No.17893057]

>>17890215
They’re the ones who get cancelled the most. The left eat their own all day.

[Anonymous No.17893067]

>>17890172

Did he make them read his work?

[Anonymous No.17893086]

>>17890345
It does actually. His continuous raping of children makes him a pedo too.

[Anonymous No.17893087]

>>17893067
> please mr Foucault, I’m sorry I said your work lacks class consciousness!
>I understand now, leaving “power” as a faceless archetype allows for a broader application, now please put the belt away!

[Anonymous No.17893193]

>>17893057
They only get cancelled if they stray from the orthodxy. Focault is the ideal modern leftist, a degenerate, cosmopolitan, cynical libertine who stopped pretending to bother with the plight of the working class. A faggot as well. His exalted position will be unchanged.

[Anonymous No.17893220]

>>17893193
The fetishization of the working class is so stupid. Workers are among the stupidest, brainless people alive. How could you feel sorry for them?
>cosmopolitan, cynical libertine
All of these things are associated with Diogenes so its based.

[Anonymous No.17893355]

im sorry but the 90% of the intellectual community is just degenerate faggots pushing the boundries of society to see how shitty they can make things. these people are like rockstars who are worshiped by the public for being cool or talented while they're actually just greasy pieces of shit who do drugs and pump and dumb underage kids

[Anonymous No.17893358]

>>17892415
It will get worse for YOU fuckers. I am a right-wing Catholic, every single thinker and writer I like has never been touched by the Woke crowd because they never cared about them in the first place. All my favorite thinkers and writers came pre-canceled, so I have been able to enjoy them, read them, and discuss them with my like-minded comrades totally in peace, because that crowd wrote them off as bigoted, sexist, homophobic, and transphobic from the very beginning.

[Anonymous No.17893381]

>>17890172
Foucault has always been lowkey sketch. His ties to neoliberalism are alarming iykyk.

[Anonymous No.17893522]

>Workers are among the stupidest, brainless people alive. How could you feel sorry for them?
I disagree. I find the working class more down to earth and common sensical on average than the elite and their stewards.
I don't feel sorry for workers. You're making a mistake by viewing society through the lens of whom is the most deserving of 'empathy'. That's how you end up with these strange idea of castrating children to free them of their oppressive gender identity. I think the morals of the working class are more sound than those of the decadent elite.

If you think Foucault and Diogenes are comparable you should read at least one of them more, probably both.

[Anonymous No.17893529]

>>17893220
>>17893522
A reply for this.

[Anonymous No.17893558]

>>17893358
>more down to earth and common sensical
ie stupid, unthinking and brainless.

[Anonymous No.17893569]

>>17893558
reply for >>17893522

[Anonymous No.17893596]

>muh pedos
Based. Now that all the pseuds will distance themselves it will be easier to rewrite Foucault's ideas and sell them as my own

[Anonymous No.17893609]

>>17891063
he was gr**k, what more needs to be said?

[Anonymous No.17893612]

>>17893558
If one way of thinking leads to the conclusion that children should be raped, put on life-altering hormone treatments and that their genitals should be mutilated and the other way of thinking leads to protecting children form rape, life-altering hormone treatments and genital mutilation, I'd argue the latter is the less stupid way.

Someone who is highly educated within a propaganda institution isn't necessarily more intelligent than one without such credentials who is questioning the institution form the outside. It takes more brains and thinking to go against the grain and renounce the ruling ideology than it does to support it.

[Anonymous No.17893619]

>>17893612
Your way of thinking led you to assume that there are no child abusers and trannies among the lower classes, which is retarded.

[Anonymous No.17893660]

>>17890360
foucault was an antimoral Nietzschean. Anything more than a superficial engagement with pomo kills the cuck journalist.

[Anonymous No.17893720]

>>17893619
I never said that there aren't bad people among the working class. Those people are rightfully ostracized, unlike their equivalents among the elites. However, tranny ideology and pedophilia isn't being pushed by the working class on a societal level. It's being pushed from above by people like Foucault. The working class is wary of degenerate anti-social behaviour and immoral hedonism while our elites instead revel in it.
You stick to the self-help books of Clinton, Obama and Markle if that's your choice. I prefer to look elsewhere from wisdom, thank you very much.

[Anonymous No.17893736]

>>17890203
>I thought you guys were against cancel culture?
This isn't twitter, bitch. FUCK Foucault.

[Anonymous No.17893747]

>>17893596
>Foucault's ideas
Pedophile egghead NEVER had an original thought in his life lol.

[Anonymous No.17893757]

>>17891729
>like ugh... who the fuck cares about having sex with little kids...
ywnbaw

[Anonymous No.17893773]

>>17893612
>>17893720
This is not a matter of ways of thinking. The masses do not think. They simply are.

[Anonymous No.17893781]

>>17890252
based

[Anonymous No.17893789]

>>17893355
pretty much. "intellectuals" are an extremely whorish bunch deep down in spite of their professional demeanor. it is the degenerated aristocracy of modern day society.

[Anonymous No.17893794]

>>17893358
based and enlightened

[Anonymous No.17893796]

>>17890252

[Anonymous No.17893993]

>>17891050
Because all humans have a dark twisted side, to pretend like we don't is naive.

[Anonymous No.17894024]

>>17891741
Die

[Anonymous No.17894030]

All the anons here that fellate the Greeks condemning Foucault baka..

[Anonymous No.17894039]

>>17893993
Integrate the shadow, fellas.

[Anonymous No.17894040]

>>17893720
>The working class is wary of degenerate anti-social behaviour and immoral hedonism while our elites instead revel in it.
??? The working class drinks itself to death get abortion eat junk food have sex every day

[Anonymous No.17894041]

>>17890185
>colon-ized
KEK

[Anonymous No.17894057]

>>17891063
young Greek bussy

[Anonymous No.17894136]

>>17894040
That’s the agenda the elites have set in motion as a means to subdue them, correct.

[Anonymous No.17894252]

>>17891798
You know that dating a 14-year-old is a pretty common thing, right?

[Anonymous No.17894372]

>>17894252
If you had a 14 year old daughter would you feel comfortable for her to date someone twice her age? The disparity between the mental differences alone is creepy.

[Anonymous No.17894387]

>>17892537
Probably bureaucrats, journalists, jannies, just general blue checkmark types.

[Anonymous No.17894391]

>>17894372
this anon >>17894252
is probably german or something

[Anonymous No.17894409]

>>17894372
>If you had a 14 year old daughter would you feel comfortable for her to date s̶o̶m̶e̶o̶n̶e̶ ̶t̶w̶i̶c̶e̶ ̶h̶e̶r̶ ̶a̶g̶e̶ David Bowie?
Yes.

[Anonymous No.17894411]

>>17894391
The German soul has fallen quite low, hasn't it. While many zoomers are radicalized nowadays, current and future conceivable political activism doesn't extend more than online larping.

[Anonymous No.17894414]

>>17894409

[Anonymous No.17894429]

>>17890172
>Foucault, who died in 1984 aged 57
It pisses me off that I thought Foucault was still alive.

[Anonymous No.17894546]

What was most harmful idea for society from these 3?

-Prisons are bad
-Mental assylums are bad
-Schools are bad

[Anonymous No.17894555]

>>17894546
The mental asylums one because at least we still have prisons and schools. Almost all of the mentally ill people they let out of the asylums when they closed ended up homeless, which of course exacerbates the problems with prisons and makes urban life generally unlivable. Maintaining asylums used to be a point of pride for states and a large portion of budget was devoted to it; now we probably spend far much more on police and prisons to offset the harm caused by insane people being on the street.

[Anonymous No.17894592]

>>17890172
This is why I don’t take modern French philosophers seriously. Degenerates and pseuds that appeal to the middle and high class “rebellious” youth. Misery as an accessory.

[Anonymous No.17894600]

>>17894409
lel

[Anonymous No.17894615]

I do no wrong by still agreeing with his writings.

[Anonymous No.17894618]

>>17894615
/thread

[Anonymous No.17894630]

>>17894615
Nobody claimed otherwise you dumb cunt.

[Anonymous No.17894657]

>>17894630
It's what every panicker is thinking - it's implied

[Anonymous No.17894816]

>>17894657
Its not and theyre obviously living in your head rent free.

[Anonymous No.17894837]

>>17894816
I don't need to be paid to think about things

[Anonymous No.17894863]

>>17890172
The translation they did is fucking disgusting. They softened Sorman's language to the point of ambivalence. He was very disgusted by Fucko. Sorman didn't want his writings to be banned because people should learn from the fact that this loser used philosophy to justify disgusting acts. This Anglo paper over here making it sound like Sorman thought the Tunisian kids were chill with it. That isn't what he said at ALL.

[Anonymous No.17894916]

>>17890334
>>17890414
>>17890457
>>17891509
>>17891741
You guys are all massive hypocrites. I bet you all treated the Roy Moore accusations or the accusations against Trump (which had way more evidence behind them) as mere “allegations”. Also Guy Sorman was not his friend lmao. He’s been critical of that part of the left for years.

[Anonymous No.17894928]

>>17893522
>I find the working class more down to earth and common sensical on average than the elite and their stewards.
Nah, the average worker is just a beast, a brute, and a piece of shit like everyone else. Only through Christian morality, and its Marxist derivatives, does the worker, the bee, is elevated to underserving, higher role. Its the perfect grift to dupe people into serving their worthless interests when they are just as replacable as anyone else. Labor is nothing more than a vanity for people who are uncreative, lack an artistic, and inquisitive mind to be anything else. No one ought to be proud of workers, and the ones who are proud ought to be humble, not pious, of their pathetic position in life.
>That's how you end up with these strange idea of castrating children to free them of their oppressive gender identity.
So what? The world is a dangerous place filled all kinds of stuff that will make your skin crawl. You moralizing over it doesn't change the reality of it - man is a beast, and do as it pleases. It has no reason to value anything other than itself. Morality is just the smokescreen pious, demented people use to conceal the fact that man is an animal no different than a jackal. People who claim to be "morally rightous" are simply being deceitful - authentic men are not made by their words,a nd these same fools believe they are the business of saving people - when certainly don't have the skills to do so. I honestly don't give a fuck if children are killed, are harmed, and nobody has to.
>You're making a mistake by viewing society through the lens of whom is the most deserving of 'empathy'
You're making the mistake I have view society through lens but own. I have no reason to value the views of anyone but my own.
>I think the morals of the working class are more sound than those of the decadent elite
They're both decadant forms of slave morality of different classes. It is individuals who standout, not the parasites that are bundled in with them.

[Anonymous No.17894939]

>>17894136
Imagine being so fucking retarded you think that natural, pscyhology urges are a plan by "the elites" to subdue them. Are you stupid? Capitalism has created the atomization, consumerism possible so that none that communist non-sense matters. You just a pious atheist retard trying way too hard to "save people" who have no need to be saved. They don't need to care about you, your beliefs, or the non-sensical "end history" gospel from you from communists.

[Anonymous No.17894978]

>>17893993
>yes everyone is terrible let's poison the water and fall in line
you and the neuroticism others have irresponsibly infected you with is responsible for creating and facilitating these people and overall social and moral decay

[Anonymous No.17894985]

>>17894939
retard. upper middleclass ideologues have absolutely destroyed the social fabric of the workingclass in their pet projects along with labour movements and political awareness. when you propagandise dysfunction through heavily centralised mass media to the masses this is what happens.

[Anonymous No.17894991]

>>17894978
seethe. the ancient greeks depicted their heroes and gods committing outrageously immoral deeds. the christians recorded with relish the fallenness of their saints. our modern age is strangely allergic to human imperfection. it has no notion of the fall.

[Anonymous No.17894993]

>>17894916
This. None of these people would apply the same standard to Brett Kavanaugh.

[Anonymous No.17895132]

>>17893358
you must be at least 18 to post here

[Anonymous No.17895186]

>>17890172
B-based?!?

[Anonymous No.17895222]

>>17890387
Based shota appreciator

[Anonymous No.17895268]

>>17894555
Why did they stop caring about mentally ill? Purely out of economics?

[Anonymous No.17895281]

>>17890185
All f@gs are rapists, that's nothing new.

[Anonymous No.17895332]

>>17894615
the fact you agree with his inane ramblings at all is worse than being a anti-pedo moralist.

[Anonymous No.17895339]

>>17894024
fuck you faggot kys
>>17894916
I'm not american you fucking mongoloid

[Anonymous No.17895348]

>>17895332
>inane ramblings
got filtered hard?

[Anonymous No.17895352]

>>17895348
foucault is such a banal nonentity that if you whittle him down to his essence, he's just another psychopath in academia.

[Anonymous No.17895358]

>>17895352
yep, you got filtered

[Anonymous No.17895385]

>>17895358
no my friend, foucault is the one who is "filtered" with his gross misinterpretation of nietzsche and history as a whole.

[Anonymous No.17895400]

>>17895385
nah, nietzsche would have loved his interpretation. Truth, and historical analysis, should be subordinated to life, untruth and art. You really think calling people "psychopaths" does harm to nietzscheans?

[Anonymous No.17895531]

>>17890549
>several of his books on psychiatry
He wrote one (and one on medicine in general). This guy never read Foucault.

[Anonymous No.17895533]

>>17895400
>nah, nietzsche would have loved his interpretation.
the french put this "every interpretation of nietzsche is valid because nietzsche is a perspectivist" concept in your head and you fell for it hook, line, and sinker. foucault merely misappropriates nietzsche for his own means, reducing him to a mere genealogy and nothing more. foucault, like many other postmodern philosophers, cares more for the idea of nietzsche rather than nietzsche himself. he is exactly the so-called "objective" man nietzsche loathes; an inauthentic charlatan.

[Anonymous No.17895591]

>>17895533
>merely misappropriates nietzsche for his own means
just like nietzsche misappropriated every philosopher. And philosophers tdo this all the time. I mean the great ones. The only ones who are concerned with the real, truthful and authentic are those who remain in the shadow of the great ones, mostly academicucks. Why would you need a copy pasted version of a philosopher? Misinterpretation is vital to originality.

[Anonymous No.17895686]

WE REDDIT NOW

https://www.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/mfbdnv/french_philosopher_michel_foucault_sexually/?sort=top

[Anonymous No.17895692]

>>17895348
Foucault isn't difficult, no one gets filted by it.

[Anonymous No.17895694]

>>17890172
AHAHAHAHAHHAAAHAHHA

>B-BUT JP TAKES BENZOOSSSS WAHHHHHH

[Anonymous No.17895699]

>>17895694
lol. Why compare the two?
Foucault was an intellectual. Peterson is a self-help shill.

[Anonymous No.17895704]

>>17895699
cope

[Anonymous No.17895709]

>>17895704
The irony of that statement will be lost on you

[Anonymous No.17895727]

>>17895699
Peterson is more of an intellectual than Foucault was

[Anonymous No.17895729]

>>17895727
Lol no.

[Anonymous No.17895735]

>>17895729
Nice argument retard

[Anonymous No.17895746]

>an aids-ridden homosexual also happens to be a pederast
I am truly shocked.

[Anonymous No.17895748]

>>17895735
Cope and seethe

[Anonymous No.17895749]

>>17895748
I accept your concession.

[Anonymous No.17895756]

>>17895727
Hilarious to me that they'll brush off pedophilia in a heartbeat but then rail on peterson nonstop for dealing with some personal issues and taking benzos. They truly are deluded psueds.

[Anonymous No.17895759]

(((Guy Sorman)))

[Anonymous No.17895763]

>>17895756
>they'll

Sounding paranoid

[Anonymous No.17895769]

>>17891530
Lol

[Anonymous No.17895780]

>>17891622
It was real in his mind.

[Anonymous No.17895787]

>>17891530
>michael fuckalt(ernative mode)

[Anonymous No.17895796]

>>17891622
>>17895759
Except jews are pro postmodernist pedos

[Anonymous No.17895804]

>>17890172
>A fellow intellectual, Guy Sorman
>Guy Sorman is Jewish
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guy_Sorman#:~:text=Guy%20Sorman%20is%20Jewish..,now%20holding%20French%20dual%20citizenship.
case closed

[Anonymous No.17895843]

>>17890250
>inplying the twitter cancel crowd is educated in any way shape or form

[Anonymous No.17895894]

>>17890172
I don't give a fuck. Refute his works otherwise suck my cock
>NOOOOO HE WAS BAD MAN THEREFORE HIS PHILOSOPHY WAS WRONG
Argument of the weak and the stupid

[Anonymous No.17895902]

>>17895894
>t. never read Foucault
He's self-refuted

[Anonymous No.17895909]

>>17895902
go dip your penis into the river, it will be a better bait

[Anonymous No.17895910]

>>17891050
What would be Kierkegaard's darkness? Can't think of anything too bad.

[Anonymous No.17895913]

>>17895902
I never said he was correct or not, I am only saying that using the argument of "he was bad man" to refute his work is extreme brainlet teir nonsense
t. Have read foucault

[Anonymous No.17895931]

>>17895533
Even Bataille is more deserving the notoriety.

[Anonymous No.17895932]

>>17895913
Like I said, this is not to refute his works. His works are self-refuted. This is just an addendum that on top of all his works being garbage he's also a pedophile.

[Anonymous No.17895933]

>>17895910
He was a philanderer.

[Anonymous No.17895961]

>>17895933
Lmao what, are you joking?

[Anonymous No.17895995]

>>17895961
He was a manwhore, a seducer, preying on young women's virginity.

[Anonymous No.17896002]

>>17890172
Did we not know this already?

[Anonymous No.17896041]

>>17895995
you sound like an ugly woman

[Anonymous No.17896050]

>>17895995
???? Kierkegaard abstained from sex after he interrupted his marriage to Regine Olsen.

[Anonymous No.17896055]

>>17895995
What you're talking about sounds like Johannes the seducer from Either/Or part 1.

[Anonymous No.17896198]

>>17896055
Yeah. Don't you think it was autobiographical?

[Anonymous No.17896289]

>>17890203
kys

[Anonymous No.17896312]

>>17891200
Neruda was canceled by the Chilean neo-leftists for being a rapist. It's delightful to see the left eating their own

[Anonymous No.17896320]

>>17891200
>modern cultural Left
foucault was explicitly agaisnt left

[Anonymous No.17896338]

Let's not pretend he didn't EARN those boys. And they were probably well paid: what's more autonomous and conscious than WILLINGLY earning a buck?

[Anonymous No.17896364]

>>17890172
In other news, water is wet.

[Anonymous No.17896368]

>>17890703
>>17891175
this poster is 16 years old.

[Anonymous No.17896454]

>>17890172
Take the pill, bros

[Anonymous No.17896465]

>>17893358
And now Foucault joins your company. Be glad.

[Anonymous No.17896472]

>>17893522
>If you think Foucault and Diogenes are comparable you should read at least one of them more, probably both.
Something tells me (you) haven't read Foucault's last lecture series.

[Anonymous No.17896481]

>>17894372
And at 18 it's suddenly okay?

[Anonymous No.17896520]

>>17893522
BASED

[Anonymous No.17896748]

>>17890252
pomobitches can't handle this truth, bro

[Anonymous No.17896805]

>>17891646
Kill yourself

[Anonymous No.17896833]

What makes Foucault so popular? Why is he the most cited philosopher in modern history? Why is he such a darling of the Left? Was he a plant to subvert the Left, or a pedophile charlatan who just got famous because France is delusional and pretentious, or is he an actual genius?

[Anonymous No.17896839]

>>17896198
Nah man I think it's much more complicated than that.

[Anonymous No.17896844]

>>17891960
All the good ones will last.

[Anonymous No.17896852]

>>17893358
based

[Anonymous No.17896876]

[Anonymous No.17896990]

>>17896839
Johannes was even one of his pseudonyms.

[Anonymous No.17897772]

>>17890230
>his support of pedophillia can only be considered a mistake

[Anonymous No.17897825]

>>17893522
Workers are literally just domesticated peasants

[Anonymous No.17898572]

>both the far left and far right are nonces
So the horseshoe theory is correct.

[Anonymous No.17899376]

faggot jannies deleted the other thread.

[Anonymous No.17900613]

>>17890172
bump

[Anonymous No.17902094]

gonna be honest. idgaf. ofc his early stuff is degenerate, its still okay, useful for right wing analysis even, biopolitics, panopticons and shit i fuck with.

His later stuff is still incredible, hermeneutics of the subject, real stoic shit and ought to be read.

idg the hate against him desu, hes unlike most other 'pomos' since he is easily read and doesnt do grand sweeping philosophy really, theres just some odd fixation from people who havent read him. *if* hes a pedo, well, okay, we already knew he was a degen, his later work is still pretty great, are we gonna start looking at each philosophers personal lives? cancel them now? nietzsche was accused of masturbation obsession, what that say of his work?

[Anonymous No.17902143]

>>17894916
the jump from Foucault to Trump just broke my brain. the fuck you do that for?

[Anonymous No.17902167]

>>17902143
>the fuck you do that for?
sheeeeeit mah nigga mup da doo

[Anonymous No.17902473]

>>17890613
> unless they also defend pedos, which the common man won't stand by
Give it a few years. That or some BIPOC LGBTQ BLM ACAB uni professor will regurgitate his ideas and they'll use her as a template while cancelling him.

[Anonymous No.17902502]

>>17891729
>the a in amoral stands for anti

[Anonymous No.17902930]

>>17890172
>Foucault, who died in 1984 aged 57, was a paedophile RAPIST
>Young children were running after Foucault saying ‘what about me? take me, take me
lmao

[Anonymous No.17903014]

>>17890172
all homos are pedos
all women love being raped
we all wanted to fuck our mummy (if she was hot)
14-16 age is prime pussy

nothing new under the sun

[Anonymous No.17903048]

>>17890172
>we got too cocky
>too cocky
>faggots
>cocky
YA DAMN TOOTIN WE DID

[Anonymous No.17903091]

>>17893720
>The working class is wary of degenerate anti-social behaviour and immoral hedonism while our elites instead revel in it.
>You stick to the self-help books of Clinton, Obama and Markle if that's your choice. I prefer to look elsewhere from wisdom, thank you very much.
In atheism the bourgeois mores are gladly adopted by the peasants. That's the force of atheism.

[Anonymous No.17903442]

So where is the evidence of rape? Sounds like they were having fun.

[Anonymous No.17903485]

>>17890172
how many times are you going to make this thread? 12? 50? 200?

[Anonymous No.17903600]

>>17890172
Jewish thread

[Anonymous No.17903669]

>>17890172
>Nietzschean
>Amoralist
I see no problem here

[Anonymous No.17903715]

>>17890292

[Anonymous No.17903741]

>>17903014
Preach

[Anonymous No.17903748]

>>17894916
>can't defend point
>w-wu-wuht about _insert unrelated shit_
kill yourself

[Anonymous No.17903843]

>>17890203
Pedophilia is way worse than what pass as "racism" these days. Get fucked.

[Anonymous No.17903873]

>>17891729
It seems like you fail to realise you're exactly the problem here.

[Anonymous No.17903980]

>>17891729
Trads would at most give a moderate fuck about this. There was no age of consent in various "trad" mores and people would be more accepting if the relationship didn't have other issues (which to be fair it did in the case of Foucault).

>>17896833
Foucault is bigger in Anglo countries than in France. Americanos consistently having terrible taste in Frenchmen doesn't make us the problem.