[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 6 KB, 193x262, Niet.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17840678 No.17840678 [Reply] [Original]

>> No.17840683

It's hard to refute schizo ramblings

>> No.17840688

>>17840678
Nietzsche has been refuted before. For example, theres an aphorism in Beyond Good and Evil where he says that he isnt always right about everything. This has since been refuted

>> No.17840692

>>17840683
Especially when they're irrefutable.

>> No.17840717

>>17840683
Schizos are irrefutably the greatest writers.
If I wanted to know the thoughts of your average jack-off I'd make a twitter account.
I'd throw Heidegger in the ring because you can always make the argument that the interpretation is inaccurate.

>> No.17840753
File: 593 KB, 3200x1800, longform-lead-credit-jake-stangel-1525106191.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17840753

>> No.17840769
File: 63 KB, 705x700, Gustavo-bueno.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17840769

>>17840678

>> No.17840772

>>17840769
basado

>> No.17840783

literally every philosopher, there's no such thing as a philosophy being refuted since it is beyond truth and falsity by nature, it has no referent outside of it's own self-positing. hence the vast co-existence of systems.

>> No.17840818
File: 57 KB, 622x960, cutiepie heidegger 4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17840818

>>17840678

>> No.17841164

>>17840683
Especially when they're relatable

>> No.17841192

>>17840678
He’s been refuted you dumbass.

>> No.17841209

>>17840783
this. very keyed and kino answer

>> No.17841225

>>17841192
Awesome argument. This is the kind of highbrow contribution I like to see.

>> No.17841409

>>17840753
He refuted himself by giving lecture on cleaning your room while being fucked up on benzos

>> No.17841465
File: 190 KB, 791x1024, b31c975ac9cf986e02913b39022c940e.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17841465

Nobody can refute her because nobody has read her. They see an objectivist, and when they're done laughing they toss her books in the trash.

>> No.17841477
File: 284 KB, 1200x1471, hume.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17841477

I've actually refuted Hume but since I have not been recognized I suppose it is till true

>> No.17841491

>>17840678
Refuted multiple times.

>> No.17841496

>>17841465
I’m not so sure that she was right about everything, but this is unironically true. It blows my mind.

>> No.17841511

>>17841491
False.

>> No.17841541

>>17841511
Truth.

>> No.17841542
File: 16 KB, 300x433, Download (1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17841542

Irrefutable because he's the absolute truth.

>> No.17841545

>>17841541
Prove it.

>> No.17841562

>>17841496
It's sad, because she's brilliant, but that impression is completely justified. She really ought to be the starting point for some better philosophers of the future. But mostly objectivists I've seen seem to think she solved the problem of philosophy, and it's embarrassing.

>> No.17842124

>>17840769
>implying proties would ever read spanish authors
Gustavo Bueno dabs on them multiple times.